SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology StocksIntel Corporation (INTC)


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: FJB who wrote (186799)3/15/2018 11:59:54 PM
From: milo_morai
   of 186865
 
Great post!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw4/26/2018 4:17:15 PM
1 Recommendation   of 186865
 
Intel earnings: 87 cents per share, vs 72 cents expected
cnbc.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw5/17/2018 7:50:03 AM
   of 186865
 
Intel’s latest foray: Powering the internet of things
marketwatch.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Glenn Petersen5/17/2018 11:31:56 AM
   of 186865
 
Exclusive: Intel's Mobileye gets self-driving tech deal for 8 million cars

Message 31618462

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw6/21/2018 10:57:39 AM
   of 186865
 
Intel's Brian Krzanich is forced out as CEO after 'consensual relationship' with employee
cnbc.com

Cramer: I have faith others can take charge at Intel after Brian Krzanich's ouster
cnbc.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Don Green6/26/2018 10:28:17 AM
   of 186865
 
Intel and the Danger of Integration
Posted on Monday, June 25, 2018

Last week Brian Krzanich resigned as the CEO of Intel after violating the company’s non-fraternization policy. The details of Krzanich’s departure, though, ultimately don’t matter: his tenure was an abject failure, the extent of which is only now coming into view.

Intel’s Obsolete OpportunityWhen Krzanich was appointed CEO in 2013 it was already clear that arguably the most important company in Silicon Valley’s history was in trouble: PCs, long Intel’s chief money-maker, were in decline, leaving the company ever more reliant on the sale of high-end chips to data centers; Intel had effectively zero presence in mobile, the industry’s other major growth area.

Still, I framed the situation that faced Krzanich as an opportunity, and drew a comparison to the challenges that faced the legendary Andy Grove three decades ago:

By the 1980s, though, it was the microprocessor business, fueled by the IBM PC, that was driving growth, while the DRAM business was fully commoditized and dominated by Japanese manufacturers. Yet Intel still fashioned itself a memory company. That was their identity, come hell or high water.

By 1986, said high water was rapidly threatening to drag Intel under. In fact, 1986 remains the only year in Intel’s history that they made a loss. Global overcapacity had caused DRAM prices to plummet, and Intel, rapidly becoming one of the smallest players in DRAM, felt the pain severely. It was in this climate of doom and gloom that Grove took over as CEO. And, in a highly emotional yet patently obvious decision, he once and for all got Intel out of the memory manufacturing business.

Intel was already the best microprocessor design company in the world. They just needed to accept and embrace their destiny.

Fast forward to the challenge that faced Krzanich:

It is into a climate of doom and gloom that Krzanich is taking over as CEO. And, in what will be a highly emotional yet increasingly obvious decision, he ought to commit Intel to the chip manufacturing business, i.e. manufacturing chips according to other companies’ designs.

Intel is already the best microprocessor manufacturing company in the world. They need to accept and embrace their destiny.

That article is now out of date: in a remarkable turn of events, Intel has lost its manufacturing lead. Ben Bajarin wrote last week in Intel’s Moment of Truth:

Not only has the competition caught Intel they have surpassed them. TSMC is now sampling on 7nm and AMD will ship their architecture on 7nm technology in both servers and client PCs ahead of Intel. For those who know their history, this is the first time AMD has ever beat Intel to a process node. Not only that, but AMD will likely have at least an 18 month lead on Intel with 7nm, and I view that as conservative.

As Bajarin notes, 7nm for TSMC (or Samsung or Global Foundries) isn’t necessarily better than Intel’s 10nm; chip-labeling isn’t what it used to be. The problem is that Intel’s 10nm process isn’t close to shipping at volume, and the competition’s 7nm processes are. Intel is behind, and its insistence on integration bears a large part of the blame.

Intel’s Integrated ModelIntel, like Microsoft, had its fortunes made by IBM: eager to get the PC an increasingly vocal section of its customer base demanded out the door, the mainframe maker outsourced much of the technology to third party vendors, the most important being an operating system from Microsoft and a processor from Intel. The impact of the former decision was the formation of an entire ecosystem centered around MS-DOS, and eventually Windows, cementing Microsoft’s dominance.

Intel was a slightly different story; while an operating system was simply bits on a disk, and thus easily duplicated for all of the PCs IBM would go on to sell, a processor was a physical device that needed to be manufactured. To that end IBM insisted on having a “second source”, that is, a second non-Intel manufacturer for Intel’s chips. Intel chose AMD, and licensed first the 8086 and 8088 designs that were in the original IBM PC, and later, again under pressure from IBM, the 80286 design; the latter was particularly important because it was designed to be upward compatible with everything that followed.

This laid the groundwork for Intel’s strategy — and immense profitability — for the next 35 years. First off, the dominance of Intel’s x86 design was assured thanks to its integration with DOS/Windows: specifically, DOS/Windows created a two-sided market of developers and PC users, and DOS/Windows ran on x86.

stratechery.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw7/27/2018 3:50:20 PM
   of 186865
 
Shares of Intel dropped more than 8 percent on Friday on fears of stiffening competition and product delays.
Although the chipmaker beat earnings expectations on Thursday, analysts expressed concern that rivals like AMD will eat away at its dominant market share.
Aside from external competition, Intel has been struggling to maintain production timeline goals on its next-generation chips.
cnbc.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw3/21/2019 10:52:02 AM
   of 186865
 
Intel's 9th Gen mobile Core processors will launch before July

The chips could lead to more powerful laptops for games and creators.
engadget.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw4/4/2019 11:21:30 AM
   of 186865
 
Intel is preparing for a data-centric tsunami
venturebeat.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw4/17/2019 8:24:01 AM
   of 186865
 
Intel said on Tuesday it's pulling out of the 5G smartphone market and will provide further details later this month.
cnbc.com
“The company will continue to meet current customer commitments for its existing 4G smartphone modem product line, but does not expect to launch 5G modem products in the smartphone space, including those originally planned for launches in 2020,” Intel said in a statement late Tuesday.

In the smartphone market, “it has become apparent that there is no clear path to profitability and positive returns,” Swan said in the statement. The company has warned in the past that margins are lower in the device market than in data centers. Intel said it will keep investing in its 5G network infrastructure business.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10