SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Biotech / MedicalAgenus (AGEN)


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Area51 who wrote (30)7/20/2005 9:21:01 AM
From: The Dodgy Ticker
   of 146
 
I'm hoping that since the results of the phIII trial for RCC keep getting pushed back (because there haven't been the required number of "events"), the implication is that the treatment with Oncophage is working.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (31)7/20/2005 10:27:45 AM
From: Kirk ©
   of 146
 
"I'm hoping that since the results of the phIII trial for RCC keep getting pushed back (because there haven't been the required number of "events"), the implication is that the treatment with Oncophage is working."

That would be nice, but the price sure isn't reflecting this. It seems to have fallen off the radar screen of traders with only 21,622 shares traded so far today.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Kirk © who wrote (32)8/2/2005 12:51:37 AM
From: tuck
   of 146
 
CTIC II?

Anybody had a hard look at trial design and recruitment strategy? I no longer follow AGEN, even as a short candidate, but thought I'd mention the parallel if anyone else is interested in digging up that kind of stuff.

Cheers, Tuck

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (1)10/10/2005 7:02:39 AM
From: The Dodgy Ticker
   of 146
 
Melanoma trial results are out:

biz.yahoo.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (34)10/10/2005 9:10:35 AM
From: bio_kruncher
   of 146
 
Q. When is a Phase III trial not a registration trial?

A. When it fails.

Classic case of trying to tout a subgroup.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: bio_kruncher who wrote (35)10/10/2005 9:42:08 AM
From: Kirk ©
   of 146
 
Can you explain what you mean to us bio novices?

Along with the news, I posted some charts of AGEN here
suite101.com
Chartwise, it made a nice double bottom

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Kirk © who wrote (36)10/10/2005 11:32:02 AM
From: tuck
   of 146
 
This link contains the full PR -- remember that Yahoo links eventually die.

Message 21779166

What I believe biokruncher was saying, is that the vaccine has largely failed, except in this m1a subgroup of undetermined number. He can speak for himself, that would be my take, though. The smaller that number turns out to be, the less likely any benefit for them from Oncophage is real.

Cheers, Tuck

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: tuck who wrote (37)10/10/2005 8:44:54 PM
From: The Dodgy Ticker
   of 146
 
An explanation by a Yahoo poster on the significance on today's results.

finance.messages.yahoo.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: tuck who wrote (37)10/11/2005 10:54:46 AM
From: The Dodgy Ticker
   of 146
 
Tuck,
If Oncophage helped no one, why would any sub-group in the treatment arm show better results than those who were treated with the best current therapy for melanoma?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: John McCarthy10/12/2005 7:57:12 AM
   of 146
 
Antigenics says Oncophage looks promising
United Press International

WASHINGTON, Oct 10, 2005 (UPI via COMTEX) -- Antigenics said preliminary phase III results indicate its personalized cancer vaccine Oncophage may extend median survival by eight months in patients with advanced melanoma, compared with aggressive treatment with conventional options.

The company said the difference in survival time is not statistically significant, but noted this is the first cancer vaccine to show a potential survival benefit in this category of patients in a phase III trial.

Antigenics expects to have a final analysis completed in the first quarter of 2006, and plans to initiate another phase III trial next year, with the aim of filing for Food and Drug Administration approval sometime in 2007, spokesman Sonny Uberoi told United Press International.

"These findings further validate our technology platform and our ability to create personalized cancer vaccines in a real-life setting," Garo Armen, chairman and chief executive officer of Antigenics, which is located in New York City, said in a statement. "We look forward to discussing our results with the FDA and developing a strategy for registration."

The category of patients that showed a potential survival benefit consisted of those with stage IV melanoma, meaning the cancer had spread to subcutaneous tissue or distant lymph nodes, but not to their vital organs.

Dr. John Kirkwood, who was involved in the trial and is director of the Melanoma Center at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, told UPI that cancer specialists are "enthusiastic" about Oncophage, because the current treatment options for metastatic melanoma generally are ineffective and some can be quite toxic to the patient.

"Patients with this disease face a desperate situation for which we really lack any promising approaches," Kirkwood said, noting about 60,000 people develop melanoma each year in the United States, and approximately 8,000 die from it.

Oncophage is made from a patient's tumor. By customizing the vaccine to each patient, the hope is it will spur the body's immune system to recognize only cancer cells and spare healthy tissues, thereby avoiding some of the serious side effects of chemotherapy and radiation.

In the study, which Antigenics said is not intended for registration, 133 patients received Oncophage and 107 received physician's choice, which included interleukin 2, dacarbazine and temozolomide, and complete tumor resection.

Those receiving Oncophage had a median survival time of 20.9 months, compared with 12.8 months in the physician's choice arm, an improvement of 50 percent.

Antigenics also is developing Oncophage technology to treat renal-cell carcinoma and plans to file for FDA approval in 2006 for that indication, Uberoi said. The FDA has granted the vaccine both fast track and orphan drug status for both melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma.

E-mail: sciencemail@upi.com

URL: www.upi.com
Key(s): Antigenics Interleukin

omniomix.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10