SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PastimesThe United States Marine Corps


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: TimF11/19/2020 4:32:37 PM
   of 6221
 
U.S. Marine F-35Bs Embark on U.K. Carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth


youtube.com

Marine F-35 Squadron Details Training Deployment Aboard HMS Queen Elizabeth
news.usni.org

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: TimF12/12/2020 8:13:34 PM
   of 6221
 
Marines board a landing craft air cushion inside the well deck of the amphibious assault ship USS Bataan

reddit.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: TimF2/9/2021 2:21:40 PM
1 Recommendation   of 6221
 
What We Did Was Real - WW2 Marine Recalls Island Combat | Memoirs Of WWII #13

youtube.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: TimF2/19/2021 5:11:51 PM
   of 6221
 
Marine Corps Reveals It Has Tested A New Anti-Ship Missile Launcher Truck
thedrive.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: TimF who wrote (6210)2/19/2021 5:14:36 PM
From: LindyBill
   of 6221
 
Anti-Ship Missile Launcher Truck

It's going to sit on what shore and launch at what ships? Sounds redundant to me.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: LindyBill who wrote (6211)2/19/2021 5:40:11 PM
From: TimF
   of 6221
 
I'm not sure I understand what your getting at with the question. Like any weapon's system it sits were you put it and it launches at your target.

Its not a new concept, other countries have mobile ground based anti-ship missile launchers, but I think it is new to the USMC.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: TimF who wrote (6212)2/19/2021 7:33:25 PM
From: LindyBill
   of 6221
 
I just can't imagine a situation where the Marines would be firing from shore to hit enemy ships.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: LindyBill who wrote (6213)2/19/2021 8:10:36 PM
From: TimF
   of 6221
 
Such a situation would be unlikely. It would presumably require a peer or near-peer conflict (which would be unlikely mostly but not only because they would probably have nuclear weapons). Any conflict against a lesser power (or in particular against some militia, insurrection, or terrorist group) would either be against someone without ships or with ships that would probably never threaten the USMC mission because they would be destroyed before coming close.

Potentially if you had some small USMC deployment near the coast or on an island off the coast of South Korea it could be used against North Korea's navy, but North Korea's navy (at least if they try to use it actively rather than hide it) would not likely be long for this world in any 2nd Korean War. You could also get scenarios against the Iranian navy but the same point holds for them as well.

Even among neer-peer powers Russia is not likely to present the type of threat that this would deal with, their conventional threat would mostly be deployed across land. There are some possible scenarios for small scale use against Russia in maybe the Baltics or potentially Norway, but the Russian surface fleet would probably stay on defense in any potential war.

So at the moment its pretty targeted to China. If the US tried to stop some Chinese attack against Taiwan, or the Japanese islands that the PRC claims, or you had some other island based conflict in the East China Sea, or South China Sea, or potentially further from China than that (but still in the Pacific) if the naval balance between the US and China shifts significantly, and China becomes more aggressive further away from their shores.

I don't think the capability would be worth developing if it was extremely expensive but this isn't an extremely expensive capability for military equipment. The launchers are just variants of vehicles that the USMC is going to have anyway, and the missiles are already developed.

I think having the capability makes sense for the US. It makes even more sense for other countries that are close to potential threats like Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Finland, Sweden, Vietnam, Israel, Iran (who would want to use it against the US or against countries that we are allied to). And a number of them already have mobile ground based anti-ship missiles launchers.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: TimF who wrote (6214)2/19/2021 8:57:13 PM
From: LindyBill
   of 6221
 
The Marines have not impressed me with their weapon's choices. Their vertical lift planes sat on the decke of the carriers in the Indian Ocean during Afghan one because they didn't have the range to loiter. They still went ahead with them on the F-35.

They would do better spending their research on how to better protect and help their troops to fight.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: TimF6/23/2021 8:19:18 PM
1 Recommendation   of 6221
 
Marines Pick Loitering Munition To Arm Light Vehicles And Drone Boats
So-called "suicide drones" will give Marine units a new option for finding threats and engaging them precisely on land and at sea.
thedrive.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10