SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsFreddie Mac (FRE) pops the housing bubble


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: KeepItSimple who wrote (21)10/13/2003 1:04:15 PM
From: John Carragher
   of 50
 
out at 58. nice run... will take profit here.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: KeepItSimple who started this subject10/23/2003 2:17:12 AM
From: KeepItSimple
   of 50
 
Treasury mulls cutting Fannie and Freddie's loan guarantees:

Look out below!

biz.yahoo.com

Treasury Says Administration Open To Ending GSE Borrowing Line
Wednesday October 22, 6:12 pm ET
By Rebecca Christie, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- If Congress wants to end Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM - News) and Freddie Mac's (NYSE:FRE - News) ability to borrow from the Treasury, the administration is game, a top Treasury official suggested Wednesday.
ADVERTISEMENT


Wayne Abernathy, Treasury's assistant secretary for financial institutions, said the Bush administration isn't currently seeking to repeal Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's ability to borrow from the government. Under current law, the Treasury Secretary can purchase up to $2.25 billion of each company's debt in times of crisis.

But Abernathy said the administration would consider ditching that provision if lawmakers desired. "If in the process of legislation, if Congress wants to take on this issue we're open to having that discussion," Abernathy said in response to a question on that score.

Abernathy's comment echoed 2000 remarks by Gary Gensler, a senior Treasury official in the Clinton administration. Gensler actively sought to eliminate the so-called Treasury line of credit, since government-sponsored enterprise securities are already required to make clear that they aren't obligations of the U.S. government.

Gensler's remarks caused a stir in financial markets that lingered for some time. Abernathy's comments Wednesday had only a little market impact.

There has been no recent movement on Capitol Hill toward abolishing the Treasury line of credit, and the GSEs have lobbied to keep it for its symbolic value. The Treasury provision is one of the elements comprising the GSEs' implicit government guarantee, as perceived by financial markets.

The Bush administration has not directly tackled Treasury's lending authority. Instead, it has focused on the need for better disclosure, and more recently it has called for a stronger regulator that has broader powers over housing-related GSEs.

Treasury officials already have opposed one legislative proposal to move GSE regulation to Treasury, saying the bill didn't add enough power to justify a move. Earlier this month, Treasury Secretary John Snow told lawmakers that a weak Treasury-led regulator could actually make things worse by strengthening the GSEs' perceived government backing.

Abernathy seconded Snow's opinion in his comments Wednesday. He also reiterated the administration's view that any GSE regulator needs to have the power to approve new product lines as well as supervise existing business.

"Otherwise, it's kind of phony," Abernathy said. "You would give the sign of being part of the Treasury Department without any of the substance."

-By Rebecca Christie, Dow Jones Newswires; 202 862 9249; rebecca.christie@dowjones.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: KeepItSimple7/11/2008 1:53:07 PM
   of 50
 
i may be early in my calls of a company's collapse, but i'm never wrong.

i was just 4 years too early on this one.

DOWN SHE GOES.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: james-rockford8/19/2008 12:50:40 PM
   of 50
 
Bought some FRE here at $3.99, a lottery type play.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


From: james-rockford8/21/2008 2:03:49 PM
   of 50
 
FRE is one hellava trading stock!! My initial entry was too high, but I've bought and sold several times today alone. It moves so fast, if you're a trader, you gotta love the action!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: james-rockford who wrote (26)8/22/2008 3:58:50 PM
From: mlkr
   of 50
 
not a bad deal considering you bought/sold it $55 not so long ago. what is your take day trader!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: mlkr who wrote (28)8/25/2008 2:51:54 PM
From: james-rockford
   of 50
 
Where do you get that nonsense? I've never owned FRE in my life till last week, I don't appreciate what I consider an attack.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: james-rockford8/25/2008 2:53:54 PM
   of 50
 
FRE debt sale very well received:

Reuters
Freddie debt sale eases concerns of nationalization
Monday August 25, 1:17 pm ET
By Al Yoon

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Ailing mortgage finance company Freddie Mac easily sold $2 billion of short-term debt on Monday, reassuring investors that it and rival Fannie Mae can fund operations without a government takeover.

ADVERTISEMENT
Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM - News) shares rose 9 percent, and Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE - News) stock gained more than 22 percent in early afternoon trading in New York. Broader markets tumbled.

An analyst said the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), which own or guarantee nearly half of the mortgages in the United States, were unlikely to be nationalized, which also soothed market jitters.

Investors have been dumping their stock and have pushed the shares down more than 90 percent since March on fears the housing slump will leave the two insolvent without emergency support from the government.

Freddie Mac on Monday sold $1 billion each in three- and six-month bills, with a measure of bids stronger than its sale earlier this month. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae must routinely issue debt to refinance maturing issues that fund their combined $1.5 trillion in mortgage investments.

"The GSEs continue to have access to funding," said Rajiv Setia, a strategist at Barclays Capital in New York. If higher rates are paid for that funding, it will get passed on through higher consumer mortgage rates, however, he said.

The companies' ability to sell debt relatively cheaply is crucial not only for their existence but because they are the only large providers of money for the depressed housing market as the credit crunch sidelined banks and Wall Street investment firms.

Investors have feared that as mortgage defaults pile up and erode the two companies' capital, the U.S. Treasury would intervene, supporting their access to credit markets but leaving shareholders with nothing.

Citigroup analyst Bradley Ball, who has held a "buy" rating through turmoil surrounding the GSEs, challenged that premise.

"The recent GSE sell-off has been surprising, since the only catalyst was apparently a press report suggesting that federal officials are likely to recapitalize the GSEs soon," Ball wrote. Nationalization is unlikely, he said.

Citing an unnamed source, Barron's last week reported a government recapitalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was increasingly likely and that losses could go beyond common stock to preferred shares and subordinated debt.

Ball increased his "risk" rating on the two companies to "speculative" from "high," while keeping a "buy" on the shares. Ball slashed his target prices on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by more than half to $9 and $6, respectively.

In early afternoon New York trading, shares of Freddie Mac soared 23 percent to $3.45 and Fannie Mae shares climbed 9 percent to $5.46.

Ball wrote that options for Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and the companies include an equity investment by the Treasury, a loosening of capital surplus requirements by their regulator, a sale of mortgage bonds to free up capital, or nothing until market conditions improve.

"We continue to watch market developments," Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin, told reporters. "We continue to be in touch with the companies and their regulators and continue to stay on top of this."

The Treasury still believes that the mortgage finance giants should remain shareholder-owned, a source familiar with Treasury thinking told Reuters on Friday.

McLaughlin said that the Treasury's new GSE adviser, Morgan Stanley, was not expected to issue a formal, public report on its recommendations to the Treasury regarding its temporary backstop authority. Rather, there would be "exchanges of information" between Morgan Stanley and the Treasury through the end of Morgan's contract in January.

Yield spread premiums on the corporate "federal agency" senior debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac increased slightly after narrowing sharply last week. Investors believe a government bailout would make the debt more like U.S. Treasury securities, and remove the risk implied by the spread.

Fannie Mae on Monday announced it would tap the debt markets for $2 billion in three- and six-month bills.

(With reporting by Julie Haviv in New York and David Lawder and Patrick Rucker in Washington; Editing by Tom Hals)

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: james-rockford who wrote (29)8/26/2008 12:28:23 PM
From: mlkr
   of 50
 
"out at 58. nice run... will take profit here." this is ur post!
take it easy man!
no insult intended.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: mlkr who wrote (31)8/26/2008 1:13:27 PM
From: james-rockford
   of 50
 
You're mistaken, it wasn't me. I'm sure that quote was posted at some time by somebody, but it sure wasn't me. If I owned FRE in the past I would say so, no big deal to me.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10