| To: Ilaine who wrote (72322) | 9/22/2004 5:01:40 PM | | From: haqihana | | | | | CB, GHW Bush was not the one that picked any stopping point. It was the ineffective, namby pamby, weak kneed, UN that put as much pressure possible to make Bush stop. It is a pity that he didn't tell the UN to go to hell, and finish the job. |
| | Politics for Pros- moderated | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: Ilaine who wrote (72638) | 9/22/2004 5:07:48 PM | | From: Sig | | | | <<News of the Weird: 60 Minutes bumped a story about the fraudulent Niger documents in order to run the Bush TANG story, supported by fraudulent documents.>>>
Fraudulent documents??
I thought they would just be "un-verified."
Can Bush plead 'misled' as Rather and CBS did.?
I say give Bush back his F-102 and give Kerry his Swift boat and have at it.
May the best man win...
Free advice for Rather and Mapes..
"When you set out for revenge, first dig two graves"
Courtesy, James Bond - for your eye only
Sig |
| | Politics for Pros- moderated | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: Lane3 who wrote (66707) | 9/22/2004 5:12:14 PM | | From: TimF | | | | Because there is a consensus that axe murderers are absolutely barbaric while there isn't a consensus that suicide bombings of busses and restaurants is absolutely barbaric. I understand that you are asserting the latter but I doubt that even you really believe that. If it were absolutely barbaric, then there would be no circumstance, no scenario, in which you could tolerate the practice.
If there is any situation that justifies suicide bombings, that same situation would justify ax murder. The method used doesn't change the moral implications of the act. Either its ok to be biased against suicide bombers, or its not ok to be biased against ax murderers.
Tim |
| | Politics for Pros- moderated | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| |
