SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PoliticsPolitics for Pros- moderated


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: LindyBill6/4/2019 3:02:32 AM
2 Recommendations   of 763363
 
Fashion Notes: Melania Trump Is the Crown Jewel in Dior Haute Couture for U.K. State Dinner 1,862Getty ImagesJOHN BINDER3 Jun 20191,405
1:22

First Lady Melania Trump was the crown jewel at the State Banquet alongside President Trump, Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Charles, and Camilla Parker Bowles at Buckingham Palace in London on Monday. Mrs. Trump went full, old American glamour in a Christion Dior Haute Couture ivory gown that was custom fit and designed for her by the Parisian fashion house, based on a similar gown from the brand’s Spring 2019 Haute Couture collection.

With her hair swept back in a chic French twist, Mrs. Trump paired the silk crepe couture gown with long, white ruched satin gloves reminiscent of those often worn by beloved First Lady Jackie Kennedy in the early 1960s.

Of course, only sparkling earrings are necessary for such an ensemble.


(Jeff Gilbert – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

(AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)


(Jeff Gilbert – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

(AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)

(Alastair Grant – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

(AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)

(Victoria Jones- WPA Pool/Getty Images)


(Alastair Grant – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

(Jeff Gilbert – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

(AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)

(Alastair Grant – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

(Victoria Jones- WPA Pool/Getty Images)


(AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)

Earlier in the day, Melania Trump donned an iconic, double face wool crepe hat designed by her personal couturier, Hervé Pierre.

The style statement — the fourth white hat worn by Mrs. Trump since becoming First Lady — was paired with a white Dolce & Gabbana dress featuring a navy collar and belt to match the hat’s midnight blue silk hatband.


(Toby Melville/Pool via AP)

(Toby Melville/Pool Photo via AP)

(REUTERS/Toby Melville/Pool

(Henry Nicholls – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.


Entertainment London / Europe Politics Dior Donald Trump fashion notes First Lady Melania Trump haute couture Melania Trump Queen Elizabeth II

.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: LindyBill6/4/2019 3:09:37 AM
3 Recommendations   of 763363
 
thegatewaypundit.com Seven-Year-Old From Texas Raises $22,000 for Border Wall With Hot Chocolate and Lemonade Stands
by Cassandra Fairbanks


June 3, 2019



A seven-year-old child from Texas has raised $22,000 for a border wall with lemonade and hot chocolate stands. The child, Benton Stevens, attended a ribbon cutting ceremony for We Build The Wall‘s unveiling of the first portion of a crowdfunded barrier in Sunland Park, New Mexico.

“Benton Stevens raised $22k with his hot chocolate stand to help build the wall! We were honored to have him at our ribbon cutting ceremony yesterday for the wall he helped pay for along with all of you who donated. This is only the beginning and we’re excited to keep building more to protect our nation and the legal citizens who proudly call American their home!” We Build the Wall, an organization crowdfunding the private construction of a border wall wrote on Facebook.

The child decided he wanted to help fund the wall after watching President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address last year, and began raising money with his lemonade and hot chocolate stands in February.

Stevens has also now launched a website called Benton’s Stand where you can purchase packaged lemonade and hot chocolate.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: LindyBill6/4/2019 3:22:52 AM
2 Recommendations   of 763363
 
dailymail.co.uk Trump slams CNN's 'negative' coverage of his state visit to UK
By Emily Goodin, U.s. Political Reporter In London For Dailymail.com

President Donald Trump slammed CNN's coverage of his state visit to the United Kingdom, complaining the cable news network is the only one available for viewing and it's reporting is 'negative' and 'fake news.'

'Just arrived in the United Kingdom. The only problem is that @CNN is the primary source of news available from the U.S. After watching it for a short while, I turned it off. All negative & so much Fake News, very bad for U.S. Big ratings drop. Why doesn't owner @ATT do something?,' Trump tweeted Monday from London.

The president made his complaint shortly after arriving in the UK for a three-day state visit.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: frankw19006/4/2019 4:56:57 AM
1 Recommendation   of 763363
 
Climate Science 3; There is No "Greenhouse Effect" on Venus Either



Brief note and refs at the youtube site; hit "show more"

youtu.be

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: FJB6/4/2019 8:31:38 AM
3 Recommendations   of 763363
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: LindyBill who wrote (685293)6/4/2019 8:36:08 AM
From: skinowski
   of 763363
 
But I like this idea better: tell China that if they don’t reform their predatory trade practices, we’ll cut off all student visas for Chinese students at American universities.
Hmm... in the days past, we had more confidence in ourselves and in our culture. We expected that foreign students would become Americanized, that they would like what they saw - and would bring those ideas back home. For the most part this worked.

Not for everyone. Sayyid Qutb, for one, turned out to be a notable exception. The guy totally hated the US, and returned home to become possibly the top ideologue of modern islamism. But overall, some exceptions - and occasional spies - notwithstanding, cutting off young Chinese from getting to know the US is a very questionable idea.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: FJB who wrote (685298)6/4/2019 8:45:19 AM
From: FJB
9 Recommendations   of 763363
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: LindyBill who wrote (685293)6/4/2019 8:48:26 AM
From: DMaA
   of 763363
 
Academics think they are the center of the universe.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: skinowski who wrote (685299)6/4/2019 9:07:43 AM
From: LindyBill
1 Recommendation   of 763363
 
cutting off young Chinese from getting to know the US is a very questionable idea.

I am "one handed" on that one, but on the whole I am for it. I wonder why Trump doesn't cut off Anchor Babies. Hopefully, he will do it second term.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


From: LindyBill6/4/2019 9:17:42 AM
1 Recommendation   of 763363
 
spectator.org Who Ran Crossfire Hurricane? | The American Spectator | Politics is too important to be taken seriously.
by Jed Babbin
He is a former United States Deputy Undersecretary of Defense who served during the first Bush administration in the United States.

“Crossfire Hurricane” — the melodramatic code name for the FBI/CIA spy operation on candidate Trump and his early presidency — was run for the FBI by then-FBI Director James Comey, his deputy Andrew McCabe, Special Agent Peter Strzok, and a few others.

Then-CIA director John Brennan ran it for the CIA. Brennan had to have help, but who was it? A lot of evidence points to the CIA’s then-chief of station in London in 2016-2017, and now the Director of Central Intelligence, Gina Haspel.

President Trump claimed that the FBI and CIA’s spying on his campaign and early presidency was treason. Attorney General William Barr said that, legally, it wasn’t.

Barr is correct. But note well that he didn’t say that crimes other than treason weren’t committed. On Friday, Barr said that since he became attorney general he had been asking why the counter-intelligence investigation was begun and hasn’t yet gotten a satisfactory answer.

The criminal investigation being conducted for Barr by U.S. Attorney John Durham is aimed at the intelligence community. As I wrote last week Trump’s recent executive order, which requires the intelligence agencies to cooperate with Barr and gives Barr the power to declassify anything he chooses, was probably necessitated by the stonewalling by the CIA and the NSA that Durham had already encountered.

There is every reason for the CIA to stonewall. Its current director, Gina Haspel, must have played a major role in conducting the CIA/FBI spy op on Trump.

One result of last week’s column was that one of my intelligence sources — a longtime veteran of the U.S. intelligence community — reappeared after about a year of silence. This person reminded me that he/she tried — unsuccessfully — to warn the White House against Haspel’s nomination to be DCI because of her longstanding close ties to Obama’s CIA chief, John Brennan.

Many people who objected to Haspel’s confirmation, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), based their objections on the fact that Haspel had run a CIA site in Thailand in which terrorist suspects were reportedly waterboarded. The waterboarding charge was sufficient to get the Senate — and apparently the White House — to overlook the real problem with her: the fact that, as Paul once implied in a tweet, Haspel is Brennan’s acolyte and protégé.

Brennan was — and still is — a hyper-partisan anti-Trumper. He was a relentless promoter of the Steele dossier allegations against Trump. Either he or James Comey (the two are disputing which) insisted on including information from the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 2017, which said that the intelligence community had agreed that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump. We know that Brennan has lied to Congress on a host of topics, including events surrounding the spy op on Trump’s campaign and presidency.

Haspel’s longstanding loyalty to Brennan ranks her among the two or three worst personnel choices made by President Trump.

Her loyalty to Brennan is more than a little relevant to Durham’s investigation because, as noted above, Haspel was the CIA’s Chief of Station (COS) in London from 2014-2017. It was during the latter two years of her tenure there when all of the FBI/CIA spying operation on Trump and his campaign occurred.

I’m told that the most-coveted job in all of the CIA (second only to the directorship) is the COS-London job. Before her tenure there in 2014-2017, Haspel had already had that job from 2008 to 2011. It’s very unusual for anyone to have it twice. Brennan probably gave Haspel her second stint there as a reward for her loyalty.

COS-London sits in on weekly meetings of the UK’s Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) for the purpose of exchanging top-secret intelligence information. The JIC is made up of the heads of all the UK intelligence agencies ranging from MI6 to GCHQ, the UK’s equivalent of our National Security Agency.

During her 2008-2011 stint, Haspel would have made many close friends among the UK intelligence community. Those ties would have been renewed during her 2014-2017 time in the COS-London job.

During Haspel’s later time as COS-London, much of the action on CIA/FBI spy op on Trump took place in London.

The New York Times reported on May 16, 2018 that within hours of opening the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation into Trump’s supposed collusion with Russia, two FBI agents were dispatched to London to interview Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer about his meeting with Trump advisor George Papadopoulos. One of those agents was Peter Strzok, the anti-Trump FBI agent who led the “Crossfire Hurricane” team.

As the CIA’s chief of station (COS), Haspel would not only have known about Strzok’s mission to London, but would had to have been briefed on it and approved it.

And that’s not the half of it. Haspel, as Brennan’s COS in London, must have run the UK end of the spy op on Trump for Brennan.

In addition to the Downer meeting, much of the Crossfire Hurricane action took place in London. Among the UK meetings that were part of the spy op in London were meetings between Stefan Halper, the Cambridge professor, and Carter Page, another minor Trump advisor. (Page also met with one of Halper’s employees who was operating undercover for the FBI.) Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese academic, also met with Carter Page in London and cooperated with the FBI’s investigation.

All of these meetings were parts of the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation. They had to have been overseen by the CIA’s London Chief of Station: Gina Haspel.

We don’t know — yet — what went on between Brennan, Haspel, or any of their agents and Christopher Steele, author of the dossier that was later seized upon as the basis for their “investigation.” Durham will have to investigate all of the London events and every aspect of Haspel’s and Brennan’s involvement.

Remember Hillary’s “ Clintonmail.com” email system on which she communicated with Obama himself? Did Haspel, Brennan, and Comey — like many Obama officials — have non-government email accounts through which they communicated among themselves and with the Obama White House?

Durham will face the most determined stonewalling by the CIA on all of this. Both Haspel and Brennan have a lot to lose, so she will be fighting tooth and nail against any of Durham’s requests for documents and testimony. Durham, and Barr, will have to force the issue.

There are too many other inquiries Durham will have to make to recount here. But it’s worthwhile to mention two others.

The “original EC” is the much-discussed and never revealed electronic communication that Brennan sent to Comey that supposedly kicked off the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation. We don’t know the date, but the investigation — we are told by the FBI — began on or about July 31, 2016. The original EC must have been dated days or weeks before that date.

House investigators Reps. Devin Nunes and Trey Gowdy were allowed to view a heavily redacted version of the original EC only after threatening to begin impeachment proceedings against FBI Director Christopher Wray and then-deputy AG Rod Rosenstein. It is still classified and unavailable to Congress and the public. Durham will be able to get it in unredacted form and Barr, if he so chooses, can release it publicly. He should.

We don’t know what, if any, of Christopher Steele’s input is contained in the original EC. It’s important to find out because Steele’s dossier begins with a memorandum dated 20 September 2016, two months after the likely date of the original EC.

That’s important because — despite the date of his first memo in the dossier — we don’t know when Steele began to spread his rumors about Trump to the FBI or CIA. It is entirely possible — even likely — that Steele (a trusted FBI source at the time) successfully peddled his unverified, anonymously sourced products to the FBI and CIA long before September 2016.

Barr and Durham have an enormous — and enormously important — task before them. They should not hesitate to go to the president whenever they are stonewalled by the CIA or FBI. His executive order is just the beginning of his necessary involvement in their investigation.

The faster Barr and Durham can complete their investigation, the sooner the public will learn about the abuses of power that occurred in the FBI/CIA spy op on Trump, his campaign, and his early presidency.






Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10