SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PoliticsSupport the French! Viva Democracy!


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Joachim K who wrote (7348)7/13/2022 8:58:32 AM
From: Tom Clarke
2 Recommendations   of 7400
 
Indian farmers streamed fake pro cricket matches to Russian bettors for two weeks

Complete with fake sound effects and a professional-sounding commentator

A group of Indian farmers set up a fake Indian Premier League (IPL) cricket tournament so convincing that they managed to trick a Russian audience into making real bets. According to a report from the Times of India, the fake games took place on a farm in the village of Gujarat, with 21 farm laborers and unemployed teens who were each paid 400 rupees (~$5 USD) and tasked with impersonating “pro” cricket players from well-known Indian teams.

The farmers reportedly livestreamed the tournament to YouTube over the course of two weeks and even set up a Telegram channel dedicated to the games. That’s where they took bets from Russian gamblers located in Tver, Voronezh, and Moscow, despite the fact that the actual IPL’s 2022 season closed out in late May.

theverge.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7349)7/13/2022 11:11:01 AM
From: DMaA
   of 7400
 
Russians like Cricket? There is no end to what I don't know.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: DMaA who wrote (7350)7/14/2022 8:40:32 AM
From: Tom Clarke
   of 7400
 
Some people will bet on anything.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Tom Clarke7/14/2022 8:46:47 AM
   of 7400
 
The culture war over the Middle Ages
The left thinks it was too white while the Catholic New Right sees much to admire
by David Marcus
July 9, 2022



There is a war afoot, here in late civilization, over the meaning and legacy of the Middle Ages. Two distinct fronts have emerged from either side of our political spectrum. On the left, in the academy, medievalism is being diversified out of existence, its defining Western characteristics relegating it to a smaller place in a global mosaic. On the right, a certain breed of new conservative is reclaiming the Middle Ages as a keystone period in which order and reason ruled, instead of the swivel-headed “scientism” of pure observation brought on by the Enlightenment.

The ground upon which this battle is joined is the traditional Anglosphere understanding of the medieval period, roughly the fifth to fifteenth centuries ad, a period most commonly thought of as the “Dark Ages.” That moniker has always been a bit of an anti-Catholic fib, meant to start the clock of meaningful modernity at the hour of the Reformation. But recent works, such as Matthew Gabriele and David M. Perry’s The Bright Ages, show that the thousand-year bridge from the Roman Empire to the Renaissance is packed full of advances in almost every single human discipline, from building, to governing, to war, as well to learning, literature and philosophy.

So, why does the left wish to obfuscate the Middle Ages’s unique contributions, and what is it that the (mostly) Catholic wing of the New Right seeks to celebrate and regain? The thumbnail answer to the first question is that the history of the medieval period is very white and very male. This year’s Manhattan Institute Hayek Prize winner, Joseph Henrich, author of The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous, argued in his acceptance lecture that early medieval prohibitions on polygamy and incest created a unique civilization of monogamy and nuclear families that gave the West a distinct bent toward individualism and natural rights. That primacy of the nuclear family is very much in modern progressive crosshairs.

As Wellesley College professor Cord Whitaker told the New York Times in 2019, “it’s about asserting the racial and political innocence of the Middle Ages. For medievalists to try to protect the field from engagement with race is ultimately to try to withdraw from the world.”

Revisionist academics talk a lot about “decolonizing medievalism.” Ironically, they’re committing an act of absolute intellectual and historical colonization: the term “Middle Ages” only makes sense if it means a middle point between fourth-century Rome and sixteenth-century Florence. Other events were happening beyond Europe’s borders, of course, but aside from conflict with the nearby Muslim world, the continent’s emerging global supremacy, so resented by today’s leftists, was more or less self-contained. It is a story that many in the academy do not like, and so they change the cast of characters and pretend that the West was a global creation.

For their part, the New Right revanchists championing the age of knights and heraldry see in the ivory-tower wokesters the consequences of the wrong turn made as the Middle Ages veered into the Renaissance and ultimately the Enlightenment. Today’s post-liberal conservative sees the primacy of individual rights which emerged at that point as a key overreach. It is the moment, they argue, when the Christian world chose the individual spirit, rather than the common good, as the source of meaning.

Gladden Pappin, a post-liberal leading light, recently interviewed Italian conservative Francesco Giubilei, and the Middle Ages came up. Giubilei had this to say: “Our conservatism has two pillars. One is the Roman Empire: our conservatism was born with the idea of the mos maiorum of the Roman Empire. And in the second respect, our conservatism was born with the idea of the Catholic Church. We have these two pillars, and that means that the Middle Ages, which everyone derides, for us represents an important period.”

Mos maiorum is the unwritten code of ancient Roman life; it is tradition and a willingness to adhere to tradition. It is also effectively an attack on the concept of unbridled individual liberty, since the code is meant to curb the agency of those who would break with it.

What the war for the Middle Ages reveals about contemporary society is, to borrow a term from the art of the period, a triptych, like one of the great altarpieces. On the left a barbarian progressivism is bent on tearing down all traditional structures; on the right, high priests of tradition argue real freedom is found only in limitation. In between, on the center panel, lies an America torn, as always, between these competing tribes, and trying to accommodate both.

Perhaps the best way to consider these approaches is to allow the disputed period to explain itself. The medieval era may have involved religious oppression, but there were also the manuscript drawings of rabbits doing naughty things that we see in social media posts, there were also the raunchy writings of Geoffrey Chaucer. Gender and sex roles were strict but Joan of Arc got the Dauphin to Reims, and a litany of liberated women conducted chivalric affairs. And while there were bloody crusades, the Muslims who occupied parts of Spain for centuries weren’t exactly helpless victims.

In the end, the complexity of the medieval period, by far the longest discrete era in Western history, defies simple summation and side-taking. It was a crucible, one with strict feudal hierarchies, but also with lessons for responsive and good government. As St. Thomas Aquinas put it, “A tyrannical government is not just, because it is directed not to the common good, but to the private good of the ruler, as the Philosopher [Aristotle] says.” This is not exactly saying that government derives its power from the governed. That would come later. But it is a philosophical check on power.

Is the responsibility of the state to ensure the rights of individuals, or to promote the common good? That question, a fault line between the medieval and Enlightenment periods, is at the core of the war for the Middle Ages. But more than that, it is a contemporary political battle that we should expect to have with us for some time to come.

This article was originally published in The Spectator’s July 2022 World edition.

spectatorworld.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7352)7/14/2022 10:32:34 AM
From: Joachim K
   of 7400
 
I think more people would go to church if it was like this.



This is Father Marcelo Rossi, he became very famous in Brazil in the 90's after a series of songs he made and used to sing to the public. He used to go to weekend TV shows, sing and say nice words, everybody loved him (still do).

He then struggled with depression for a while, became very skinny (around the time of this push). Now he's okay, and is doing bodybuilding... he's now a very big guy.

Edit: For clarification, this woman suffered from bipolar disorder, she said she wanted to talk to him, but the security was running towards her, so she kinda freaked out and ended up pushing him.

After this, he got up and continued the ceremony. She was sent to the police station, where she was very confused. Father Marcelo didn't press charges.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Joachim K who wrote (7353)7/14/2022 11:42:25 AM
From: Tom Clarke
   of 7400
 
Quite a crowd. Looks like they have megaChurch for Catholics in Brazil.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7354)7/18/2022 2:17:28 PM
From: Joachim K
   of 7400
 
The Flying Nun now retired and living in Naples.

reddit.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: Joachim K who wrote (7355)7/18/2022 2:30:02 PM
From: Tom Clarke
   of 7400
 
She shoulda throwed a brick at him.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7356)7/18/2022 2:31:38 PM
From: DMaA
   of 7400
 
I saw, what I would call, three women. Unless your are having fun with pronouns.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: DMaA who wrote (7357)7/18/2022 2:42:58 PM
From: Tom Clarke
   of 7400
 
She was more mad at the guy with the camera. I wish I knew what she was saying.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10