| To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (3932) | 4/20/2005 10:04:06 AM | | From: monkey's uncle | | | | "But the composition and very idea of the EAC, the first broad Asian regional grouping encompassing China that would exclude the United States, is controversial. "It's a mistake," said Richard Holbrooke, a former United States ambassador to the United Nations. "Exclude America and you damage relations across the Pacific."
I wonder if Mr. Holbrooke is at all concerned about America's role in the U.N., such as not paying its dues, threatening other members with trade sanctions or favored-nation status depending upon how they cast their votes and outright veto powers.
There are still some in this country that have an inflated view of themselves and their country.
It is their believe that the world cannot function without the United States.
While these folks bask in their illusions, believe what they read in their corporate, scripted, heavily edited "newspapers" (we tell you what you need to know and believe), the rest of the world are seeking alliances for resources, industry, and cooperation.
Good (non-U.S.) article to read Gus.
Thanks,
len |
| | World Affairs Discussion | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: monkey's uncle who wrote (3933) | 4/29/2005 4:09:27 AM | | From: GUSTAVE JAEGER | | | | What Agro-Luddites don't want you to know:
Farmers say GM rice cuts pesticide illness
Tim Radford, science editor
Friday April 29, 2005
The Guardian
Small farmers in China growing GM rice reported higher yields than for conventional varieties, a lower use of pesticides, and less illness related to the use of the pesticides, Chinese and US scientists report today in Science journal.
In eight field trials in two consecutive years, the 69 farmers grew a rice genetically engineered to be resistant to stem borer and leaf roller, and also a rice fitted with an insect-resistance gene from a cowpea plant. They were not paid and made their own decisions about pesticide use; the research was funded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
For comparison, the researchers also surveyed farmers who used conventional varieties, or who grew both types. All applied the same kinds of pesticides, but on a per hectare basis the quantity and cost of those applied to conventional rice was eight to 10 times higher.
Yields of one GM variety were 9% higher than normal; the harvest from the other was about the same.
The researchers also asked the farmers' families if they had headaches, nausea, skin irritation, or digestive upsets after spraying. None of the farmers who completely converted to GM crops had pesticide health problems in either 2002 or 2003. Of those that grew both GM and conventional varieties, 7.7% reported some illness in 2002, and 10.9% in 2003.
"This study provides China and other nations with objective, research-based information about whether GM food crops can actually improve farmer welfare," said Carl Pray of Rutgers University in New Jersey.
guardian.co.uk |
| | World Affairs Discussion | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: monkey's uncle who wrote (3935) | 4/30/2005 4:38:41 AM | | From: GUSTAVE JAEGER | | | | Re: The Chinese refuse to pay royalties to Monsanto et al.
The question goes the other way, I'm afraid:
28.01.2002
China leads GM revolution
Government funding puts Chinese plant biotechnology second only to US
While westerners vacillate about the risks and benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops, China is embracing the technology. A new survey shows that the Chinese are working on more plant biotechnology products than anyone outside North America.
Chinese research institutes claim to have developed 141 GM plants, 65 of which have been approved for release into the environment. Scott Rozelle, an agricultural economist at the University of California, Davis carried out the survey.
China's GM success challenges the concern that developing countries, which stand to benefit most from such crops, cannot afford technologies produced in the West.
[...]
If China's GM crops do fill the food gap, their other GM innovations could end up being exported, suspects Rozelle. China may well become the world leader in exporting GM-crop technology to other developing countries. "There have already been sales between China and south and southeast Asian countries," he says.
[snip]
innovations-report.com |
| | World Affairs Discussion | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| To: monkey's uncle who wrote (3935) | 4/30/2005 5:05:18 PM | | From: Yaacov | | | | | look here you jack-ass, you know as much about Chines as I know about sending shuttle to the moon! you keep putting your nose in the affairs you don't know nothing about. What do you know about China? Have you ever seen a map of China? ggg all you know about china is chinese food. |
| | World Affairs Discussion | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| |
