|From: Glenn Petersen||9/29/2021 1:34:53 PM|
|Netflix acquires its first game studio in deal with Oxenfree creator Night School Studio|
Dean Takahashi @deantak
September 28, 2021 2:05 PM
Netflix has acquired its first game studio with the acquisition of Oxenfree creator Night School Studio. The purchase price wasn’t disclosed.
The Glendale, California-based game studio has 21 people and a history of pushing the boundaries for storytelling in games. It published Oxenfree in 2016 and has been working on Oxenfree II: Lost Signals for the Switch.
And yes, this means that Netflix is serious about moving into games, and it isn’t just focusing on mobile as the company hinted in an earlier earnings call. The original Oxenfree is available across eight platforms on mobile, console, and PC.
“We’re in the early stages of creating a great gaming experience for our members around the world. So we’re excited to announce today Night School Studio is joining Netflix,” said Mike Verdu, head of games at Netflix, in a blog post.
Founded by Sean Krankel and Adam Hines in 2014, Night School Studio is best known for the studio’s first game, Oxenfree.
“We’re inspired by their bold mission to set a new bar for storytelling in games,” Verdu said. “Their commitment to artistic excellence and proven track record make them invaluable partners as we build out the creative capabilities and library of Netflix games together.”
Above: Oxenfree was a narrative title that came out in 2016. / Image Credit: Night School Studio
Verdu noted no in-app purchases and no ads will appear in the Netflix games, which will be available via subscription to Netflix.
In a blog post, Krankel said, “Night School wants to stretch our narrative and design aspirations across distinctive, original games with heart. Netflix gives film, TV, and now game makers an unprecedented canvas to create and deliver excellent entertainment to millions of people. Our explorations in narrative gameplay and Netflix’s track record of supporting diverse storytellers were such a natural pairing. It felt like both teams came to this conclusion instinctively.”
He said the team will keep making Oxenfree II and keep cooking up new game worlds. It will also have room for more new hires “to help feed the office hermit crab.”
The deal doesn’t mean that Netflix is going to be in a mad rush to make more acquisitions. Verdu said the company will expand its game efforts through a combination of working with established developers as well as making new hires.
Back in July, Netflix said it hired former Oculus and EA game development leader Verdu to head its fledgling game efforts.
The company has been hiring game people for a while, and Verdu was the biggest name yet to come on board at the streaming service for movies and TV shows. The move shows the company is serious about expanding into games, which Netflix CEO Reed Hastings once described (pointing out Fortnite in particular) as Netflix’s biggest competition for the time of its customers.
Verdu reports to chief operating officer Greg Peters. Verdu was Facebook’s vice president in charge of augmented reality and virtual reality content. He also served as senior vice president of EA mobile, president of studios and chief creative officer at Kabam, CEO of TapZen, and chief creative officer and co-president of games at Zynga.
Netflix has dabbled in games before with titles like a Stranger Things game and The 3% Challenge. The latter is a voice-controlled game. And Black Mirror: Bandersnatch is a game-like experience, as it’s an interactive TV show in which the audience makes choices that influence the end of the story.
These were baby steps into games. But Verdu is a serious game leader whose career has focused on building entire portfolios of games for companies.
Netflix’s move into games has been anticipated, as all of the big tech companies have acknowledged the power of gaming, which has grown to a $175 billion industry, according to market researcher Newzoo. In the wake of the pandemic, gaming is also growing faster than many other forms of entertainment and media, according to a report this week by PwC.
More mobile games
Above: Scene from Stranger Things 3: The Game. / Image Credit: Netflix
Meanwhile, in other news, Netflix is moving into mobile games with the launch of three new mobile titles in select European markets. The casual games include Shooting Hoops, Teeter Up, (both from developer Frosty Pop) and Card Blast (from Rogue Games). They are available to Netflix members in Spain, Italy, and Poland. Netflix recently started marketing a members-only mobile game service via Android in Poland.
The new titles are displayed via a new Games tab inside the Netflix Android app. Netflix subscription credentials are required to play games. Netflix previously launched a couple of Stranger Things titles, Stranger Things: 1984 and Stranger Things 3: The Game.
Netflix acquires its first game studio in deal with Oxenfree creator Night School Studio | VentureBeat
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)|
|To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (2063)||9/30/2021 1:52:19 AM|
|From: Zen Dollar Round|
|That bodes well for Netflix developing into an entertainment juggernaut. |
The move signals Netflix's willingness to step outside their traditional streaming lane into other areas, and they're certainly not afraid of investing heavily in their content.
The news makes me even more positive about NFLX's chances in the market and should make it a good stock to own for years to come if they develop popular gaming titles.
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)|
|From: Glenn Petersen||10/2/2021 5:57:40 PM|
|State of the Streamer: Apple TV+ is Charting a Unique Path Through the Streaming Wars|
Why Apple TV+ isn't necessarily competing with Netflix.
By Brandon Katz
Is Apple TV+ a success or failure after two years? It’s complicated. Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Nearly two years after launching Apple TV+ in November of 2019, Apple has remained notoriously secretive about its fledgling streaming service. While Netflix boasts about its market leading 209 million global subscribers and Disney+ reminds the industry that it’s the fastest growing streamer with 116 million subscribers, Apple has never released an official accounting of how many viewers its streaming service has signed actually up.
According to Variety, Apple has said it has less than 20 million TV+ subscribers in the U.S. and Canada (which conveniently allows it to pay discounted rates to members of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees union). The Information reports that Apple TV+ has 40 million global accounts and 20 million paying customers. Estimates from industry analyst Entertainment Strategy Guy suggest Apple TV+ has accrued just 8.1 million paying customers in the U.S. (which is certainly less than 20 million). Regardless of which datapoint you choose, the immediate reaction is the same: Apple TV+ is severely lacking after nearly two years.
Yet different streaming services have different ambitions and raw subscriber counts are not the only metric of success and failure in the streaming wars. So before we go slapping labels on Apple TV+ all willy nilly (people still say that, right?), let’s first explore Apple’s greater goals, strategies and future outlook.
Apple TV+’s Foundation. Apple TV+
What Is Apple’s Strategy?
Apple’s current market cap stands at of $2.37 trillion, which sounds like a made-up number to anyone who brown paper bags it for lunch. From a raw economic standpoint, no one can outspend Apple, though studio heads Jamie Erlicht and Zack Van Amburg have not thrown money around carelessly. Thus far, Apple TV+’s annual content budget has hovered around $6.5 billion. Paltry compared to Netflix ($17 billion) and lagging behind Amazon Prime Video ($9 billion), both of which outspent Apple in 2021. At this point, TV+ appears to be a loss-leader, an unprofitable division that hopefully drives product sales and diversifies revenue streams.
As of August, Apple TV+ has earned the smallest share of subscriptions among the premium streaming video on demand (SVOD) platforms in the U.S., per transactional data firm Antenna.
U.S. Premium SVOD Share of Subscriptions. Antenna
“They don’t want or need to be Netflix,” David Offenberg, Associate Professor of Entertainment Finance in LMU’s College of Business Administration, told Observer. “But at the same time, I’m not sure what they’re trying to accomplish strategically. Really smart companies can still make really bad moves.”
Apple has unrivaled cash on hand, which gives TV+ a much longer horizon to build. They can be unprofitable for years and play the long game whereas a legacy competitor, such as Paramount+, cannot afford such a circuitous route to success. In this instance, patience is a virtue and it’s reflected in Apple’s methodical approach to marketing and its careful curation of quality in original content development. Its library is built entirely on originals without any pre-existing catalogue programming.
“I like that they’re building it slowly,” Offenberg said. “They have all this cash that could be put to immediate use, but instead they are developing a strong set of viewership data to make decisions about where to invest in the future before they burn through all that cash.”
The tortoise strategy appears to be working on at least one front. According to data firm Parrot Analytics, Apple TV+ has seen audience demand for its originals series grow, globally, on par with platforms such as HBO Max and Disney+. Ted Lasso is a bonafide flagship series, The Morning Show has more or less hit the right notes with audiences creatively and culturally, and the NASA-driven For All Mankind has managed to etch out its own territory in the crowded small screen sci-fi space (lame pun very much intended).
“From this perspective, Apple TV+’s performance is nothing short of impressive,” Julia Alexander, Senior Strategy Analyst at Parrot Analytics, told Observer. “The aggregate average quality is fantastic for a new service. . . . Apple has also focused on producing a smaller quantity of series and films, but curating the selection to focus on quality.”
U.S. audience demand for Apple TV+ originals over the last 90 days. Parrot Analytics
If we look at the most recent data from the last 90 days, Apple TV+ has its first real Exceptional show in Ted Lasso, followed by seven Outstanding shows, and two Good shows in the Top 10. (A significant jump from Q2 2020, when five Apple TV+ original shows were listed in the Outstanding category with the other five in the Good category.) For comparison, in the same 90-day frame, Netflix has one original garnering Exceptional demand and nine shows in the Outstanding lane; Disney+ has two Exceptional originals and eight Outstanding shows; and HBO + HBO Max has three Exceptional originals and seven Outstanding.
Apple wants to be the streaming industry’s version of HBO. Twenty years ago, HBO knew a sea of content wasn’t necessary to attract audiences, just a handful of high-quality shows. But that worked because cancelling HBO as part of a cable bundle was the aughts equivalent of scaling Mt. Everest. Apple can’t play that game; cancelling a streaming service is about as hard as going over a speed bump.
This is reflected in TV+’s churn rate, or the number of customers who cancel in a given period — hardly the area where you want to be a category leader. Yet Apple TV+ currently tops the premium SVOD field with a monthly churn rate of 16 percent, per Antenna. And the churn is unlikely to stop. Like most streamers, Apple offers a free trial period, but without any library programming (what Alexander calls “snackable TV”) the looky-loos drawn in by Ted Lasso‘s seven Emmy wins won’t have enough of reasons to stay when their free 30 days are up.
On top of that, TV+ remains minimally accessible to anyone outside the Apple ecosystem. There’s no Android phone app, and Android users make up about 70 percent of the global smartphone market. If Apple is really building TV+ as a way to grow service revenue (more on that soon) and attract new customers, it’s disregarding a massive swath of consumers.
Apple TV+’s Ted Lasso. Apple TV+Apple Services
Apple TV+ is part of a revenue segment that grossed $17.5 billion for the company in Q2 2021 and $50 billion over the past nine months alone. TV+ is one of six services available in the Apple One bundle (Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, iCloud+, Apple News+, Apple Fitness+). So we can say Apple TV+ is starting with an install base of 1.6 billion devices and 1 billion iPhones, and it’s expanding deeper into Roku, Amazon and other Smart TV devices which total in the hundreds of millions. The potential market penetration is there.
“In that light, 20 million seems disappointing,” Andrew Rosen, former Viacom digital media exec and founder of streaming newsletter PARQOR, told Observer. “But Apple is using Apple TV+ as one of multiple services to drive higher revenues. If 20 million TV+ subscribers help to push Apple past $20 billion in services revenues per fiscal quarter, are they doing anything ‘wrong’? That’s a very specific conclusion to reach without broader context.”
Alexander sees it much the same way, explaining that Apple is a trillion dollar product company that’s trying to become a trillion dollar service company. iPhone sales are trending in the wrong direction, and customers are opting for upgrades at a less frequent rate. So Apple’s growth is in its services division. The best way to ensure those services grow is through an ecosystem product like the multifaceted Apple One bundle.
TV+ vs. Amazon Fire TV is perhaps the most valuable comparison on the market in Rosen’s eyes. TV+ is software, Amazon TV sets are hardware. TV+ is for streaming Apple-approved content, Amazon TV sets are for better integrating Fire TV software with Alexa voice controls and also pricing power in the Smart TV marketplace. “The comparison tells us TV+ isn’t ‘TV,’” Rosen said. “Rather it’s a service with ‘TV’ branding that’s there to create marginal happiness for owners of 1.6 billion devices worldwide.”
Long story short: it’s all a revenue diversification play designed to create added value for Apple’s products and bundles. That’s a separate ambition from Netflix’s goal of selling only subscriptions for entertainment content or Peacock’s goal of helping to sell Comcast internet and TV deals.
Apple TV+’s The Morning Show Apple TV+Apple TV+ Outlook
Apple TV+ has won 12 Emmys since 2020 and signed first-look deals with prestige creators like Oprah Winfrey, former HBO guru Richard Plepler, boutique studio A24 and more. If Apple is weak on subscribers, it’s strong on image. And Hollywood is founded on the notion that image beats reality.
“They have data, cash, and prestige,” Offenberg said. “If they use those wisely and they’re patient, they can continue building the service to the point where subscribers are using it for more than one month at a time.”
Apple will need to broaden its offerings in order to capture a more significant share of the subscription customer pool. One way to do that, and reduce churn, is the acquisition or mass licensing of catalog entertainment. The issue, however, is that any company Apple might look to acquire has already contracted their shows out for years. Similarly, Amazon won’t be able to reroute every MGM series to Prime Video despite its acquisition due to pre-existing licensing contracts. So Apple will once again need to play the long game, which it can afford, without an immediate infusion of library content.
“For Apple TV+ to be a seriously viable product that consumers are willing to spend $5 a month on — or an app in a bundle that they actually want to open — the value proposition has to be much better than what it currently is,” Alexander said. “Apple TV+ has to create people’s favorite show, which the team has done with Ted Lasso, but also give them a reason to stick around every night day after day.”
Apple TV+ is More Than Just Its Disappointing Subscriptions Numbers | Observer
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)|
|From: Glenn Petersen||10/8/2021 6:32:39 AM|
|Netflix’s ‘Squid Game’ Is the Dystopian Hit No One Wanted—Until Everyone Did|
The South Korean survival drama that for a decade was dismissed as grotesque and unrealistic is on track to become Netflix’s most-watched show
By Dasl Yoon and Timothy W. Martin
Wall Street Journal
Updated Oct. 4, 2021 9:35 pm ET
‘Squid Game’ has hit No. 1 in more than 90 countries, including the U.S. PHOTO: NETFLIX
SEOUL—South Korea’s dystopian drama “Squid Game” might become Netflix Inc.’s NFLX -1.13% biggest hit ever. But for a decade, local studios rejected the fictionalized show’s pitch as too grotesque and too unrealistic.
The premise revolves around financially broke adults playing traditional Korean children’s games on a secluded island. The losers die. A single winner emerges with a cash prize of about $40 million.
Now “Squid Game,” which made its debut Sept. 17, is a global phenomenon. TikTok videos of people replicating the children’s games have gone viral, while online retailers are rushing to sell “Squid Game” Halloween costumes. The show has hit No. 1 in more than 90 countries, including the U.S.—a surprise even to Netflix executives.
By every metric, the Korean survival drama is on pace to surpass Netflix’s current record holders—“Bridgerton” and “Lupin”—in the total volume of hours watched and the number of subscribers who have tuned into the show for at least two minutes, said Minyoung Kim, who oversees the company’s creative activities in the Asia-Pacific region except for India.
“It’s still trending up,” Ms. Kim said. “We’ve never seen anything grow as fast and aggressive as ‘Squid Game.’”
Despite its sudden success, “Squid Game” represents a payoff from Netflix’s multiyear bet on South Korean content. The U.S. streaming giant invested about $700 million for Korean films and television shows from 2015 to 2020, the company says. This year alone, Netflix plans to spend half a billion dollars.
That compares with about $400 million earmarked for India content in 2019 and 2020, and the roughly $17 billion Netflix is spending on content world-wide this year.
The popularity of “Squid Game” comes as Netflix faces unprecedented competition, with rival streaming services seeking original hits that can grab eyeballs across continents to distinguish their offerings.
“Squid Game” creator Hwang Dong-hyuk came up with the idea for the show more than a decade ago, while living with his mother and grandmother. He had to stop writing the script at one point: He was forced to sell his $675 laptop for cash.
With a potential language barrier, Netflix emphasized visuals in the costumes and sets of ‘Squid Game.’ PHOTO: NETFLIX
Back then, potential investors and actors bristled at the brutal killings and implausibility of individuals competing to the death for money. But two years ago, Netflix thought the class struggles outlined in “Squid Game” spoke to reality.
When the Covid-19 pandemic hit the global economy, it exacerbated the disparity between the rich and the poor, said the 50-year-old Mr. Hwang. Even vaccine rollouts vary greatly based on whether a country is wealthy or not, he said.
“The world has changed,” Mr. Hwang said. “All of these points made the story very realistic for people compared to a decade ago.”
Buzz built quickly. The Netflix trailer for “Squid Game” on YouTube has already amassed more than 18 million views—more than triple that of “Bridgerton” or “Lupin.”
South Koreans have celebrated the milestone of “Squid Game” becoming the country’s first show to hit Netflix’s top spot in the U.S. and globally. Local media have labeled it the next “Parasite,” the Oscar-winning film. References to the show have even entered South Korea’s presidential election race, with some candidates making parody posters or challenging each other to “Squid Game”-like competitions.
“I was surprised to hear the show did so well outside of Korea and thought maybe the popularity of K-pop made more people interested in Korean content,” said 27-year-old Kwon Se-un, a cafe worker. “The merciless killings were attention grabbing and the range of different characters made it interesting.”
“Squid Game” went through some primping to become a global megahit. With a potential language barrier, Netflix emphasized visuals, outfitting competitors in green tracksuits and building colorful sets resembling children’s playgrounds. Some of the rules for the traditional Korean games were simplified or altered.
Many Americans also enjoy watching foreign shows with English-language dubbing, rather than subtitles—a choice that Netflix’s algorithms can automatically select for users based on their past viewing.
Korean dramas have long had a large fan base across Asia and have been seen in Europe, Latin America and the U.S. through other streaming services such as Viki Inc. and the now-defunct DramaFever Corp. But those rivals didn’t produce much big-budget, original content or boast the streaming reach of Netflix, which began its South Korean efforts in 2016.
Since then, Netflix has introduced about 80 Korean films and series, and U.S. viewing of K-dramas has doubled in the past two years, Netflix said.
‘Squid Game’ has universal appeal, says Netflix’s Minyoung Kim, because it poses a simple moral question: ‘Who are we?’ PHOTO: NETFLIX
Previous Korean hits, available on Netflix and elsewhere, typically center on boy-meets-girl love stories or Cinderella-esque tales of the wicked elites—and often weave in both. Some of Netflix’s prior K-drama successes followed that playbook, including “Crash Landing on You,” a 2019 show in which a South Korean heiress lands in North Korea during a paragliding accident.
But more recent shows began to break the mold, winning broader audiences than the K-drama die-hards. For instance, “Sweet Home,” an apocalyptic suspense series released last year, reached No. 3 on Netflix in the U.S.
About 95% of “Squid Game” viewers are outside South Korea. It has been subtitled in 31 languages and dubbed in 13, Netflix said.
Netflix’s Ms. Kim said that the show, though very Korean, has more universal appeal because it poses a simple moral question: “Who are we?”
“We are not horses, we’re all humans,” she said. “That is the question the show really wants to throw at you.”
Brittany Chang, a 22-year-old university student in Singapore, had never watched a Korean drama, but urged by friends—and Netflix’s suggestions—she watched the trailer and wondered why the desperate contestants turned on each other. “Squid Game” reminded her of “The Hunger Games,” another brutal survival tale.
“I watched the entire series in one sitting,” she said.
“Squid Game” is a story of underdogs, relatable for people who struggle, that resonates with younger audiences, much like how the K-pop band BTS became a voice for millennials, said Suk-Young Kim, head of theater and performance studies at the University of California, Los Angeles.
“Korea is no longer an exotic site where only a certain dedicated fandom culture exists,” said Prof. Kim, who has written a book about South Korea’s music industry. “It’s a major cultural hub with rising prominence in Hollywood and on Billboard charts.”
Write to Dasl Yoon at email@example.com and Timothy W. Martin at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeared in the October 4, 2021, print edition as 'Netflix Sees Hit in Unwanted ‘Squid Game’.'
Netflix’s ‘Squid Game’ Is the Dystopian Hit No One Wanted—Until Everyone Did - WSJ
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)|
|To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (2068)||10/11/2021 5:39:12 AM|
|From: Glenn Petersen|
|Netflix to Sell ‘Squid Game’ Goods, Other Products on Walmart Site|
The ‘Netflix Hub’ for consumer merchandise is part of the streaming company’s broader effort to diversify revenue and market its content
By Joe Flint
Wall Street Journal
Oct. 11, 2021 1:01 am ET
The Netflix hit ‘Squid Game’ will be among the shows that the company taps as a source of merchandise for the digital store. PHOTO: YOUNGKYU PARK/NETFLIX
Netflix Inc. NFLX 0.13% is teaming up with Walmart Inc. WMT 0.30% to create a digital storefront on the retailer’s website that will sell merchandise tied to hit shows such as “Stranger Things” and “Squid Game,” the companies said.
The partnership is part of Netflix’s broader strategy to develop new revenue streams beyond its core subscription business and market its content away from its own platform.
Netflix consumer products, from T-shirts to stickers to dolls, are already available online from several retailers. The deal with Walmart creates a dedicated area of Walmart.com for Netflix merchandise, the Netflix Hub—the first such online storefront that Netflix has created with a national retailer. Netflix also has its own online store, Netflix.shop.
“We want to continue to meet fans wherever they are, whether that’s through our biggest online marketplace at Walmart, or the more boutique and curated Netflix.shop,” said Josh Simon, Netflix’s vice president of consumer products.
Mr. Simon said revenue won’t be the only measuring stick of success for the venture. “The real value is in reinforcing fan love for the shows and films they see on Netflix,” he said.
Netflix licenses its intellectual properties to manufacturers, who create the merchandise. Netflix also gets a percentage of the manufacturer’s sales to retailers, a person familiar with the matter said.
Netflix-themed merchandise includes “Squid Game” T-shirts, “Nailed It!” baking kits and a “Stranger Things” Bluetooth cassette player. The company doesn’t disclose the size of its emerging e-commerce business.
Netflix is the world’s biggest streaming service, with more than 200 million subscribers world-wide. But growth has slowed, particularly in the U.S. Netflix faces increasing competition from rivals including Walt Disney Co. ’s Disney+ and Amazon.com Inc.’s Prime Video.
Netflix is also entering the videogame space as it tries to attract new customers and keep existing subscribers on its platform for longer periods.
Netflix’s product lineup also includes items tied to the show ‘Stranger Things.’ PHOTO: NETFLIX
Netflix Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Reed Hastings has said he doesn’t expect new business lines such as e-commerce and videogames to be significant revenue generators.
“It’s enhancing the big service that we have,” Mr. Hastings said on a recent call with Wall Street analysts, adding that the goal is to help build interest in the company’s major titles. “The reason we’re doing them is to help the subscription service grow and be more important in people’s lives.”
Walmart Executive Vice President Jeff Evans said the partnership is an opportunity for the retailer to connect with the Netflix fan base and potentially attract new customers.
Associating with more upscale brands has become a priority for Walmart. Earlier this year, it unveiled a partnership with Gap Inc. to sell Gap-branded home goods in its store. It has also launched a series of higher-end fashion lines.
Write to Joe Flint at email@example.com
Netflix to Sell ‘Squid Game’ Goods, Other Products on Walmart Site - WSJ
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read|
|From: Sr K||10/14/2021 1:15:58 AM|
|Netflix Employee Group Calls for Walkout Amid Tensions Over Dave Chappelle Show|
Streaming giant stands by special that some staff said was offensive to transgender community; ‘There will always be content on Netflix some people believe is harmful’
Dave Chappelle’s Netflix show ‘The Closer’ is currently among the most-watched programs on the service in the U.S.PHOTO: MATHIEU BITTON/NETFLIX
Oct. 13, 2021 7:53 pm ET
Tensions are rising inside Netflix Inc. NFLX 0.77% over a Dave Chappelle stand-up special that some employees said was offensive to the transgender community, the latest clash between the streaming giant’s radical-candor culture and its embrace of creative freedom.
A Netflix transgender-employee group is encouraging staff to stage a walkout next Wednesday to protest Co-Chief Executive and Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos’s recent defense of Mr. Chappelle’s special. The plans for a walkout were earlier reported by the Verge and confirmed by Netflix.
In “The Closer,” which was released last week and is currently among the most-watched programs on the service in the U.S., Mr. Chappelle said “gender is a fact” and said he identified as a “TERF,” an acronym that stands for “trans-exclusionary radical feminist.” Mr. Chappelle said he isn’t a favorite of the trans community, then added, “Someone told me, ‘They after you, Dave,’ and I said, ‘One they or many theys?’ ”
A day after the special’s release, Terra Field, a Netflix software engineer who is transgender, criticized the show on Twitter, saying Mr. Chappelle attacked “the trans community, and the very validity of transness.” The tweets went viral and led to a backlash inside the streaming giant over the special. Groups including LGBTQ-rights advocacy group GLAAD spoke up against the show, and the National Black Justice Coalition asked for Netflix to take the special off its platform.
On Monday, Mr. Sarandos issued a companywide email defending the special and saying the service wouldn’t pull it down. Mr. Sarandos said the company works hard to support creative freedom and this means “there will always be content on Netflix some people believe is harmful.” He also said he didn’t think the special incites hate or violence. Mr. Chappelle has a longstanding relationship with Netflix, having made multiple specials for the streaming service. In the end credits of “The Closer,” there is a picture of Messrs. Chappelle and Sarandos laughing together.
Addressing the criticism during an event in Hollywood last week, Mr. Chappelle said, “If this is what being canceled is like, I love it.”
Netflix said Ms. Field wasn’t punished for her tweets, but she and two other employees got into hot water at Netflix when they attended an online meeting of senior Netflix executives last week without permission.
The trio was suspended but promptly reinstated, according to Netflix. Ms. Field said Netflix told her it appeared there was no ill intent on her part and that she was unaware that the meeting was only for senior staffers at the company, according to a tweet from Ms. Field. Netflix confirmed that account.
Netflix stands in contrast to traditional studios and networks, where it is rare for employees to question content decisions—much less take to social media to negatively criticize those choices. At Netflix, radical candor and transparency are encouraged within the company’s hallways and meetings.
Among programmers, Netflix has stood out when it comes to carrying shows featuring transgender performers, including “Sense8,” “Orange Is the New Black,” “Sex Education” and “Control Z.” It also has a development deal with transgender producer Janet Mock.
This isn’t the first time a Chappelle special has caused anger inside Netflix. His previous stand-up special, “Sticks and Stones,” which also included commentary on the LGBTQ community, was found by some inside the company as offensive, according to people familiar with the matter.
Last year, a sex-filled movie called “365 Days” that was popular on the platform made some inside the company uncomfortable, as did the movie “Cuties,” which was accused of sexually exploiting young girls, the people said.
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read|
|To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (2068)||10/17/2021 3:48:30 AM|
|From: Glenn Petersen|
|‘Squid Game’ officially had the biggest Netflix original launch ever|
By Jacob Siegal
October 13th, 2021 at 2:57 PM
The legend of Netflix’s new series Squid Game continues to grow in the days following its release. On Tuesday, Netflix Geeked on Twitter announced that 111 million global accounts have started watching Squid Game. This makes the South Korean thriller the first Netflix original series to surpass 100 million viewers during its launch window. Notably, it only took Squid Game 17 days to reach such a milestone. Netflix typically measures a show’s launch window as its first 28 days on the service.
Squid Game has Netflix’s biggest launch ever
Netflix recently revealed its top 10 original series of all time during the 2021 Code conference. Keep in mind that these figures below represent the number of accounts that watched at least two minutes of any episode within the show’s first 28 days on the streaming service:
1. Bridgerton Season 1: 82 million accounts
2. Lupin Part 1: 76 million accounts
3. The Witcher Season 1: 76 million accounts
4. Sex/Life Season 1: 67 million accounts
5. Stranger Things 3: 67 million accounts
6. Money Heist Part 4: 65 million accounts
7. Tiger King Season 1: 64 million accounts
8. The Queen’s Gambit: 62 million accounts
9. Sweet Tooth Season 1: 60 million accounts
10. Emily in Paris Season 1: 58 million accounts
As you can see, Squid Game blew all of these shows out of the water. In fact, it seemingly took around two weeks for the show to break the record. Squid Game started streaming on September 17th, which means it’s still only been on Netflix for 26 days. There’s no telling how many more subscribers have spent at least two minutes watching the show in the past nine days.
Despite being a foreign-language series that arrived without much fanfare, Squid Game is going to go down as the biggest Netflix original in the service’s history. A Netflix spokesperson told The Verge that the series has reached the number one spot on the top 10 list in 94 countries. That’s every country in which Netflix features a top 10 list. Squid Game has also topped the list in the US for 21 days straight. That’s the longest any foreign-language show has ever stayed in that position.
“Before, with older media, when one country’s filmmaker wanted to go to bring their film to another country, there were a lot of barriers with time and language,” Squid Game writer and director Hwang Dong-hyuk told IndieWire. “For example, if it’s a Korean movie venturing into the U.S. market, we had to go to the film festivals and find a distributor in the U.S. But now we have streaming services and YouTube, so we have the infrastructure to go global in everything that we make. I think now if there’s good content, the global audience is just waiting to watch it. I think ‘Squid Game’ is proof that this is possible. The only possible problem that’s left could be the language barrier, but I think people are warming up to that, as well.”
'Squid Game' officially had the biggest Netflix original launch ever (bgr.com)
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read|
|From: Zen Dollar Round||10/17/2021 10:12:03 AM|
| Netflix's 'Squid Game' Will Generate $900 Million for Company: Report|
- "Squid Game" will generate just under $900 million in value for Netflix, internal documents show.
- Bloomberg reported that the documents said the series was watched by a record 132 million people.
- "Squid Game" cost around $2.4 million an episode, far less than "The Crown" and "Stranger Things."
Netflix's hugely popular TV show "Squid Game" will generate just shy of $900 million in value for the company, according to internal documents seen by Bloomberg.
The documents also revealed that "Squid Game" cost $21.4 million to produce. At around $2.4 million an episode, that's considerably cheaper than some of Netflix's other big shows.
"Squid Game" has become a global smash hit and Netflix's most-watched original show, with 132 million people watching at least two minutes. That far outstrips the previous record holder, Bridgerton, which was seen by 82 million people.
The South Korean TV show is about a brutal contest in which highly indebted people compete to win a huge cash prize. The contestants play a number of kids games — but get killed if they lose.
Internal Netflix documents seen by Bloomberg said the show generated $891 million in "impact value." That's the metric that Netflix, which operates a subscription model, uses to gauge the financial importance of shows. It suggests "Squid Game" will suck in a large number of subscribers.
At around $2.4 million an episode, Netflix is getting a very good return on its investment. "The Crown" and "Stranger Things" cost around $13 million and $12 million per episode, respectively.
The streaming giant thinks 89% of people who started "Squid Game" watched at least 75 minutes, according to Bloomberg. It thinks 66% of viewers — or 87 million people — finished the series in the first 23 days of it being online.
Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But an attorney representing the streaming service told Bloomberg: "??Netflix does not discuss these metrics outside the company."
Netflix reaped rewards from the pandemic in 2020, as people locked down in their homes binged on shows such as "Tiger King." But 2021 has been more difficult for the company as governments lifted restrictions and people have found other things to do than watch TV.
Yet, the financial markets have warmed to Netflix in recent weeks, largely due to the success of "Squid Game." Shares are up more than 6% over the last month. The company is due to report its third-quarter earnings on Tuesday.
"As always, the key number we'll be watching out is for subscriber growth," said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at broker Hargreaves Lansdown.
"The group's ability to pump out big-hitting content like 'Squid Game' may well be moving the dial on this front, but we do wonder what the reopening of the world will have meant for growth."
|RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read|