To: Jim Fitzgerald who wrote (4) | 4/9/2002 10:57:44 AM | From: RSkarsten | | | You know, I think this lawsuit is about the silliest thing I have yet to hear. It would be just the same thing to sue a hardware store for selling a saw to an idiot, knowing that he'd be likely to hurt himself.
The problem isn't with a filling of a demand but with law enforcement. This lawsuit is a classic case of "Oops, wrong target".
RS |
| SAFH | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: RSkarsten who wrote (5) | 4/9/2002 6:27:46 PM | From: Jim Fitzgerald | | | Actually, a plaintiff would probably have a much better chance with your saw analogy. After all, the Constitution doesn't guarantee the right to bear saws. These suits have no legal basis. The City of Boston finally realized this and backed down. The others will fall like dominoes, but not until the lawyers are through milking the taxpayers. |
| SAFH | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
|