SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PoliticsForeign Affairs Discussion Group


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: George Statham who wrote (150747)11/3/2004 12:10:34 AM
From: Keith Feral
   of 281500
 
Not gun shy - it is deliberate deception. They want everyone glued to the TV until the bitter end. If they release the numbers from OH and FL, everyone would go to sleep. Worst case scenario, Bush will lose MI, WI, MN, IA, NV, WA, OR. Bush will win everything else except for NH. If memory serves correct, NH split their EV votes last election, so they may do the same again.

Not sure about Hawaii, but Alaska will go with Bush. Bush is doing very well in California.

OOPs- FL just went to Bush and Washington went to Gore 234 - 199.

All Bush has to do is win OH, NM, and CO to carry 272 EV's. Add in Montana for icing on the cake. Alaska will help too.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (150740)11/3/2004 12:20:28 AM
From: Sun Tzu
   of 281500
 
>> Even a piss-pot state like Palestine is referred to as "dawlat falestiin" "The State of Palestine". "wilaaya" in the singular is used for a local state, as far as I know. Certainly.

Not quite, though it could be so. "dawlat" means "government of" (as in the official state). "Wilaayat" on the other hand often means "land of" or "country of".

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: Keith Feral11/3/2004 12:27:32 AM
   of 281500
 
Montana and Colorado were just placed on Bush side. NM and OH is all we need. OH is 80% complete with Cuyahoga county 80% complete. Not too much more waiting for this one to be official.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (150749)11/3/2004 12:38:24 AM
From: SBHX
   of 281500
 
Wilayat probably means region or state in muslim terminology. For example, Algeria uses Wilayat for its provinces. Sudan also uses Wilayat for 'states'.

countrystudies.us
encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com

This is one item in the UBL speech the US MSM edited out. In the Al-Jazeera english translation, UBL was clearly warning each state in the US to back off --- a divide and conquer strategy.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SBHX who wrote (150751)11/3/2004 12:47:10 AM
From: Sun Tzu
   of 281500
 
As I said, it can mean either of the two meanings. I'd have to listen to the tape in Arabic to tell you.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (150752)11/3/2004 12:50:55 AM
From: SBHX
   of 281500
 
It could mean land/region in theory, but even in Saudi Arabia and Yemen (UBL's old haunts), Wilayat means a province/municipality of the country.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SBHX who wrote (150753)11/3/2004 12:59:18 AM
From: Sun Tzu
   of 281500
 
Except that OBL likes to be poetic in his speeches. In modern Arabic, often Wilayat means as you have translated it. But using the word in its original meaning is not so strange, depending on the context.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Keith Feral11/3/2004 1:09:20 AM
   of 281500
 
Bush picks up Alaska for 3 more votes - 249 and counting. Ohio and New Mexico should be ready shortly. Just regained the lead in Iowa. 88% exit poll status in Ohio. New Mexico is remaining very strong. Tick tock...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Keith Feral who wrote (150755)11/3/2004 1:22:23 AM
From: jlallen
   of 281500
 
Two networks have already called OH for GWB....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Brumar89 who wrote (150737)11/3/2004 1:22:54 AM
From: Proud Deplorable
   of 281500
 
in name only? interesting point you raise. How many pure isms are really out there these days?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10