SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PoliticsForeign Affairs Discussion Group


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (150276)11/1/2004 3:46:05 PM
From: Neocon
   of 281500
 
Yes, and I stand corrected.

I do not see anything to disagree with in your enumerated points, so what would I refute? I think you were incorrect about the rate of outliers, that is about it, but I don't care enough to continue to engage with someone like you.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: stockman_scott who wrote (150061)11/1/2004 3:46:41 PM
From: GST
   of 281500
 
Speculators Bet on Kerry Win, Oil Falls

25 minutes ago Business - Reuters


By Richard Mably

LONDON (Reuters) - Oil prices fell sharply on Monday on speculation that a U.S. election win for Senator John Kerry (news - web sites) could ease the geopolitical friction that has helped fuel this year's record-breaking rally.

story.news.yahoo.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (150273)11/1/2004 3:49:24 PM
From: Bill
   of 281500
 
As Kerry would say,
"Would that it were, would that it were."

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Neocon who wrote (150279)11/1/2004 3:49:27 PM
From: Jim Willie CB
   of 281500
 
what does 95% confidence mean to you??? / jw

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: jlallen who wrote (150215)11/1/2004 3:50:08 PM
From: Jim Willie CB
   of 281500
 
you could not even define FASCISM / jw

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: michael97123 who wrote (150267)11/1/2004 3:55:23 PM
From: Rascal
   of 281500
 
Nostalgia aint what it used to be.

I've noticed we like to keep resorting things and giving things new labels. Sometimes based on a revised idea about history, or because of the over load of current events.

Let's all try this time to just be. Just ponder and feel what's right. No explanations needed. Plenty for all to do in the future.

This is about so much more than this next election.

Rascal @We'veOnlyJustBegun.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: jlallen who wrote (150252)11/1/2004 3:56:46 PM
From: Michael Watkins
   of 281500
 
Fact: Department of Energy experts, including the specific expert who designs and builds centrifuges to enrich Uranium for the United States, "debunked" in 2001 the so-called evidence that Bush/Cheney/Rice and ultimately Powell used to galvanize public and Congressional support for the war in Iraq.

Fact: August 2001 - tubes discredited. All DOE experts on record deny that tubes were for a nuclear weapons program.
Fact: Fall 2002 - tubes magically are used as the "smoking gun" to attack Iraq.

Conclusion based on facts: The intel was cherry picked. Use only the "concerns" about an issue rather than the "reality".

Facts: those involved with the case, including nuclear scientists at the DOE, tried to raise alarms. The nuke scientists were threatened with the law to shut up.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (150275)11/1/2004 4:02:58 PM
From: Michael Watkins
   of 281500
 
Leaders must be judged by their actions, and by the consequences of those actions. Not their hopes and dreams, not their good or bad intentions, not their words. And the more power they hold, the harsher should be the scrutiny. Ignorance, unintended consequences, bad intel, etc., should not be an acceptable excuse. This goes for all leaders.

Very well said.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Michael Watkins who wrote (150277)11/1/2004 4:11:16 PM
From: Neocon
   of 281500
 
Yes, and therefore, because something could be, it is. The heck with probability or further evidence.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: GST who wrote (150278)11/1/2004 4:12:42 PM
From: Neocon
   of 281500
 
Wow. I guess you are standing pat on that, huh? Okie dokie.....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10