To: Paul Kern who wrote (17) | 4/12/2001 9:13:18 AM | From: Paul Kern | | | I took another look at at BINC. It looks like this might be real so it might be a technical short -- too far up too fast -- but it's not one of the usual POS picks. In fact, if I can find the "buy" button, I might buy it.
Paul |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: Jon Khymn who wrote (15) | 4/13/2001 12:55:03 AM | From: Jon Khymn | | | ------------4/10 4/11 4/12 4/16
D 67.3 68.4 68.1 67.5 AA 37.5 39.3 39.0 39.0 UTX 74.9 74.6 72.9 75.4 JNJ 91.2 92.0 90.8 90.9 MO 47.0 47.6 45.7 45.9 <> ************ C 46.3 47.3 CEFT 44.3 45.7 NBR 52.9 53.7 |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: Jon Khymn who wrote (19) | 4/13/2001 8:57:40 AM | From: Paul Kern | | | Web,
I found the buy button and convinced my self to "invest" in this company -- a very strange sensation. Now they need a major food producer to sign a contract. This market has very little patience and if this doesn't happen soon, it's back to 6.
Paul |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: Jon Khymn who started this subject | 4/13/2001 6:53:20 PM | From: Paul Kern | | | Web,
About BINC see: washingtonpost.com
and this:
Dale Baker who wrote (24696) From: Londo Friday, Apr 13, 2001 3:32 PM Respond to of 24700
Again, congrats on BINC Dale.. but just to sober you guys up, I'll add the following:
BINC's balance sheet still isn't exactly the strongest on the planet. When it comes to negotiating royalty deals with other companies, they would be limited as others could see that they don't have a lot of room to move about.
Arla won't bring in any royalties for a couple years, so there's going to be some time before you'll see revenues ramp up.. so it won't be a billion-dollar product tomorrow (or ever)..
If its shown later on that the product isn't save, BINC would crash.
Obviously, approval is a significantly good event, and for a $100M market cap (and otherwise barely profitable operations), seems like a good gamble.. but hearing people talk about this being a $100 stock is totally pre-mature. Management has to prove they can ramp up growth, and make the product as profitable as possible.. royalty funding should help in a couple years, but the big $$$ is if they sell the stuff directly themselves, which req |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
To: Paul Kern who wrote (21) | 4/14/2001 7:06:34 PM | From: Jon Khymn | | | >>convinced my self to "invest" in this company -- a very strange sensation. <<
Yea, sometimes you gotta go with your gut feeling. Could be a good long term holding stocks, but for the short term, I think it will give back some of its gainings... |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: Jon Khymn who wrote (23) | 4/14/2001 11:03:07 PM | From: Paul Kern | | | We'll need to wait a quarter and see what the earnings from the royalties are. In the meantime, the trailing PE is a stratospheric 145. On the other hand if the product is as good as they say, there is a gigantic market for sweeteners.
Paul
PS: I could change my mind on Monday. Sell the small position, short the stock, and buy it again at a later date. |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
To: Jon Khymn who wrote (20) | 4/16/2001 5:15:05 PM | From: Jon Khymn | | | ------------4/10 4/11 4/12 4/16
D 67.3 68.4 68.1 67.5 67 G AA 37.5 39.3 39.0 39.0 39 L UTX 74.9 74.6 72.9 75.4 75.3 L JNJ 91.2 92.0 90.8 90.9 92.6 L MO 47.0 47.6 45.7 45.9 46.6 G <Closed> ************ C 46.3 47.3 47 CEFT 44.3 45.7 44.6 NBR 52.9 53.7 54.8 |
| Tomorrow's Short List | Pastime Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| |