| From: locogringo | 9/26/2021 8:53:42 AM | | | | | | BOMBSHELL
FBI Undercover Agent on January 6 Received
Text That Confirms No Trump-Led Plot to
Overturn 2020 Election
Trending Politics, by Kyle Becker
Original Article
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been outed in a New York Times piece for having undercover agents working the Capitol riot on January 6. Furthermore, the FBI agent was collaborating with a Proud Boys informant who confirmed there was no centralized plot to overturn the 2020 election results on Donald Trump’s behalf. As has been oft-repeated, the pro-Trump attendees were not part of any ‘pre-planned attack’:As scores of Proud Boys made their way, chanting and shouting, toward the Capitol on Jan. 6, one member of the far-right group was busy texting a real-time account of the march. |
| | Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| From: locogringo | 9/26/2021 8:57:33 AM | | | | | | (stated more simply for the grubers)
It’s fake news that the Maricopa audit
proves Biden won
American Thinker, by Andrea Widburg
Original Article
Democrats are strutting because the final Cyber Ninjas audit in Arizona showed that “[t]he auditor’s final hand count—which quadruple-checked every single one of the 2.1 million ballots—matches Maricopa County’s official machine count.” Big whoop. For those complaining about irregularities in the 2020 election, the question was never about miscounting. Instead, it was about the claim that an inordinate number of the ballots in the Joe Biden pile didn’t come from real people. Instead, they were alleged to have been faked—and the audit confirms almost 60,000 wrongfully counted ballots that could easily switch the Arizona Electoral College vote from Biden to Trump. No wonder Cyber Ninjas says the Arizona result should not have been certified. |
| | Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1321866) | 9/26/2021 11:03:04 AM | | From: Wharf Rat | | | | Math
A Canadian COVID-19 study that turned out to be wrong has spread like wildfire among anti-vaxxers]
The study identified 32 patients with the rare side effects out of a total of 32,379 doses of mRNA vaccines given in Ottawa in the two-month period, finding an inordinately high rate of close to 1 in 1,000 — significantly higher than other international data has shown.
But the researchers made a critical error that experts say caused the study to be "weaponized" by the anti-vaccination movement at a time when concern over COVID-19 vaccine side effects are top of mind for parents whose kids may soon get the shot.
The researchers mistakenly failed to record the accurate number of vaccinations given out during that two-month period, despite the data on total doses being publicly available, and the figure turned out to be astronomically higher than what was presented in the study.
Instead of 32,379 mRNA vaccine doses administered in June and July, as the study suggests, there were actually more than 800,000 shots given out at that time, according to Ottawa Public Health.
That means the true rate of side effects is closer to 1 in 25,000 — not 1 in 1,000.
"We recalculated the rate, and the rate is not correct in that paper," said Dr. Peter Liu, scientific director of the Ottawa Heart Institute and a co-author of the study, in an interview with CBC News.
cbc.ca |
| | Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices | Political Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| |
