SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Non-TechAshton Technology (ASTN)


Previous 10 
To: Arcane Lore who wrote (4440)9/9/2003 3:38:02 PM
From: peter michaelson
   of 4443
 
Thanks arcane, I guess it just hit me wrong - one of those quirks of memory and perception like when you write a word you've used all your life and suddenly you're not sure it's the correct spelling.

I think it's very appropriate that you are the one to respond to this arcane inquiry.

Peter

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Smokey8887/18/2006 1:27:34 AM
   of 4443
 
Asante Networks Inc. (ASTN) lives again:)

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: StockDung7/8/2014 7:14:58 PM
   of 4443
 
SEC V. AGFEED INDUS.

In a case described by SEC Enforcement Director, Andrew J. Ceresney, as a “cautionary

tale,” the SEC alleges in
SEC v. AgFeed Indus.
that K. Ivan Gothner, an AgFeed director and

chair of the audit committee, not only missed numerous red flags that should have alerted

him to accounting improprieties, but he aided and abetted the company’s fraudulent

activity, violating Exchange Act Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and Securities Act Section 17(a).

According to the complaint, Gothner learned of several red flags beginning in 2010 and

continuing through May of 2011 that indicated accounting problems in the company’s

Chinese operations. These included significantly worse than expected quarterly results, an

email from the COO describing operations as “completely out of control,” the CFO

reporting concerns he had about the accuracy of the Chinese operation’s reported results,

and reports from the COO that the Chinese unit maintained two sets of accounting

books—one real and one fabricated (for reporting purposes).
5 Gothner, in response,

contacted a former director, who recommended Gothner hire outside investigators and

counsel to look into the allegations. Rather than do so, he directed company management

to investigate. Management’s investigation in June 2011 found that there had been fraud,

but Gothner failed to inform AgFeed’s outside auditor, hire a professional firm to conduct

a review or otherwise further investigate.
6 In June 2011, an outside consulting firm further

corroborated the fraud, yet Gothner failed to cause the company to disclose the fraud or

correct reported numbers in public filings in July and August 2011. It was not until the

end of September 2011 that a special board committee was formed, and publicly disclosed,

to investigate the fraud.
7

In addition to fraud charges, the SEC charged Gothner with multiple violations related to

falsifying books and records, lying to auditors, and control person liability for false SEC

filings. In the SEC’s press release, the Director of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office stated,

“Officers and directors have an obligation to exercise diligence and ensure that their

financial reporting is accurate. Despite learning about false and misleading financial

information, AgFeed executives failed to come clean.”
8 In its case against Gothner, the SEC

is seeking civil penalties, an injunction, and a permanent bar from serving as an officer or

director of a public company.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10