SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.

   PoliticsShould Gore concede POLL


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: mph who wrote (261)11/30/2000 6:50:08 PM
From: Shoot1st
   of 312
 
Ah oui Marie,

There was eh deampule en the bellet....

ergo......deampule en mey peoust....

Knewbeddy wouid veuoted fer Goer.....hed mey deampule been sean 1st.....

respectfully,

InspectearShootieCleuseau

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (283)11/30/2000 8:10:21 PM
From: Mr. BSL
   of 312
 
Unfortunately, the machine vote process results in more no counts than the hand ballot process. Even more unfortunate is the fact that missed machine vote ballots can not be accurately hand counted, especially with no clear standard. To make matters worse, the machine ballots become even more inaccurate every time that they are handled. The race will be decided by which type of potholes those transport trucks hit - Bushholes or Goreholes.

Regards,

Dick

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Qone0 who started this subject11/30/2000 8:48:56 PM
From: Pluvia
   of 312
 
1 - GORE CONCEDE NOW

Gore is killing the market.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Qone0 who started this subject11/30/2000 9:24:49 PM
From: LV
   of 312
 
1 - The elections ended in a tie. Yes, Gore may get more votes in manual recounts of South Florida, but then the results may change again when more ballots are manually recounted. There is no way all of Florida could be recounted before the deadlines, so the process should be stopped now. Nobody knows or will ever know who is the real winner in Florida. There may not be a winner at all.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Pluvia who wrote (288)11/30/2000 9:28:17 PM
From: Matthew Tyson
   of 312
 
1

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Shoot1st who wrote (286)11/30/2000 9:42:52 PM
From: mph
   of 312
 
:-)

that's a 1, btw.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: sandeep who wrote (284)11/30/2000 10:18:57 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™
   of 312
 
I think that Bush ought to lay back and avoid being so cocky about 'winning' since no one has 'won' quite yet... he comes across as arrogant which is covering up his anxieties about not being the 'legitimate' winner at this stage of the contest..... at this point he already has the upper hand, but he is acting like he's still grandstanding for position... that's a bad move and it will surely backfire by provoking animosity among his rivals with whom he will have to work and compromise if he does win the White House... right now, his attempts to appear Presidential come across as smug, tacky, and small minded in the light of the significance and closeness of this incredibly important contest... he's acting right now as if he won the election by a landslide, which he clearly did not no matter what the eventual outcome.....

GZ

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: Mr. BSL who wrote (287)11/30/2000 10:24:29 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™
   of 312
 
Ain't that the truth!!!!!

Best Regards,

GZ

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: LV who wrote (289)12/1/2000 5:33:21 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™
   of 312
 
I think you hit the nail right on the head, we have a real tie, there is no winner... neither candidate can claim the moral authority or could now command Presidential legitimacy... so, now what what do we do.....<g> Is there anything in the play book to remedy this tie? How about a coalition type administration, would anything be wrong with that?

GZ

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (292)12/1/2000 10:16:21 AM
From: Aggie
   of 312
 
Edit: 1, by the way

G.Z., Good morning.

"I think that Bush ought to lay back and avoid being so cocky about 'winning' since no one has 'won' quite yet... he comes across as arrogant ...... smug, tacky, and small minded ... he's acting right now as if he won the election by a landslide, which he clearly did not no matter what the eventual outcome....."

Sorry, but this is BS in my opinion. Bush has made a concerted effort to remain in the background during this past 2 week period, making just minimal appearances and usually only in direct response to Gore.

Gore, on the other hand, is making the rounds like anybody's favorite squeeze. Yesterday, he hit the major networks on no less than 3 shows. Monday night, he came on before football. Remember?

Bush is doing nothing less than preparing to take the reins if that is the outcome. To accuse him of being power hungry or behaving in an inappropriate manner is a pure spinning pile of BS. Would you have the president-elect, whomever it is, do nothing to prepare for the day the keys are handed over? Do you think it's a simple uncomplicated process? Do you think Gore is not doing the same, even with his 8 year home field advantage?

Thanks for you posts, and Good Luck,

Aggie

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10