We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon
Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Revisionist history. This is a moderated forum. And that.means the job of the.moderator is to make sure that the forum operates smoothly. The decline in posters did not start until you turned it into a forum dedicated to attacking anyone who wasn't anti-AMD.
Led by yourself.
Anyway, any thoughts on Intel blowing their process lead? Being relegated to a second tier manufacturer? And one with poor yields on their second rate process?
Your perspective is tainted by your hatred of Intel. Past moderators would have banned you if you had expressed such criticism of AMD. This moderator believes in free and open discussion so posters can express their views without fear of repercussions. In the past I was quite critical of AMD's extremely unethical tactics and was quite willing to challenge those who claimed otherwise. Through it all, Intel was never found guilty by any Court of Law anywhere in the world.
Now if you want to have a serious discussion, try asking a serious question.
A) I don't hate Intel. B) No one ever got.banned for disliking AMD. People got banned for attacking other posters. A lot of Intel snowflakes used to try to.justify their bad behavior by claiming it was their beliefs that got them banned, but it was their behavior.
I asked several serious questions. It is objectively obvious that Intel has slipped behind in process. And won't regain parity, much less the lead, any time soon.
Maybe not by you but you forgot Rink who explicitly said he was banning people for their thoughts. He could tell what they were thinking. If I would apply his rules then you would have been banned already.
I asked several serious questions.
In a snarky way. Save your hate for someone who wants to play that game.
CJ, If I understand what question you were asking, Intel is years late with their new process. I won't say they're behind because calling a new process 10nm or 7nm is mostly a marketing ploy. But no doubt about it. Intel is very very late.