SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology StocksAdvanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: JakeStraw10/23/2018 4:21:49 PM
of 275855
 
Advanced Micro Devices' Correction Isn't Over
realmoney.thestreet.com

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JakeStraw10/25/2018 8:49:46 AM
of 275855
 
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Q3 2018 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
Oct. 24, 2018
seekingalpha.com

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: combjelly who wrote (275832)10/31/2018 2:02:26 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275855
 
CJ

I am impressed with what you did with this group


The only thing I did with this group was allow open and free discussion with no repercussions. Life has moved on. You should too.


Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275840)10/31/2018 2:39:26 PM
From: combjelly
of 275855
 
Hilarious.

What you did was to gang up with your buddies and harrassed the ones who didn't believe in The One True Intel until they.moved on.

And so one of the more.vibrant and active groups died.

Because of you.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: combjelly who wrote (275841)10/31/2018 3:38:11 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275855
 
Nonsense. The censorship by previous moderators is what killed it. I won't put the blame on you but you didn't help.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275842)10/31/2018 6:10:05 PM
From: combjelly
of 275855
 
Bullshit.

Revisionist history. This is a moderated forum. And that.means the job of the.moderator is to make sure that the forum operates smoothly. The decline in posters did not start until you turned it into a forum dedicated to attacking anyone who wasn't anti-AMD.

Led by yourself.

Anyway, any thoughts on Intel blowing their process lead? Being relegated to a second tier manufacturer? And one with poor yields on their second rate process?

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: combjelly who wrote (275843)10/31/2018 6:22:16 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275855
 
CJ

Your perspective is tainted by your hatred of Intel. Past moderators would have banned you if you had expressed such criticism of AMD. This moderator believes in free and open discussion so posters can express their views without fear of repercussions. In the past I was quite critical of AMD's extremely unethical tactics and was quite willing to challenge those who claimed otherwise. Through it all, Intel was never found guilty by any Court of Law anywhere in the world.

Now if you want to have a serious discussion, try asking a serious question.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275844)10/31/2018 7:36:51 PM
From: combjelly
of 275855
 
More revisionist history.

A) I don't hate Intel.
B) No one ever got.banned for disliking AMD. People got banned for attacking other posters. A lot of Intel snowflakes used to try to.justify their bad behavior by claiming it was their beliefs that got them banned, but it was their behavior.

I asked several serious questions. It is objectively obvious that Intel has slipped behind in process. And won't regain parity, much less the lead, any time soon.

If ever.

So, what do you think?

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: combjelly who wrote (275845)10/31/2018 8:13:15 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275855
 
cj

A) I don't hate Intel.



Sure.

B) No one ever got.banned for disliking AMD.


Maybe not by you but you forgot Rink who explicitly said he was banning people for their thoughts. He could tell what they were thinking. If I would apply his rules then you would have been banned already.

I asked several serious questions.

In a snarky way. Save your hate for someone who wants to play that game.



Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275846)2/18/2019 8:23:48 PM
From: combjelly
of 275855
 
There you go again.

It is sort of funny how you complain that Rink was able to read thoughts and you claim to be able to read my mind as to whether I have Intel or not.

Personally, I think you are mis-stating what Rink had actually posted. Even if true, that would have been a single moderator. And that doesn't make a trend.

It is duly noted that you refuse to answer my questions.

Because the truth hurts.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)
Previous 10 Next 10