SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology StocksAdvanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: Vattila6/5/2017 7:27:13 AM
of 275872
 
Research alliance builds new transistor for 5nm technology

"This announcement is the latest example of the world-class research that continues to emerge from our groundbreaking public-private partnership in New York," said Gary Patton, CTO and Head of Worldwide R&D at Globalfoundries. "As we make progress toward commercializing 7nm in 2018 at our Fab 8 manufacturing facility, we are actively pursuing next-generation technologies at 5nm and beyond to maintain technology leadership and enable our customers to produce a smaller, faster, and more cost efficient generation of semiconductors."

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-06-alliance-transistor-5nm-technology.html#jCp


Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275811)6/10/2017 5:10:04 PM
From: Intelim
of 275872
 
I know right?

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: hdl7/2/2017 12:18:29 PM
of 275872
 
amd pps has soared. si and this board are dead.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: hdl who wrote (275814)7/4/2017 4:28:14 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275872
 
Not dead. Just resting...

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zax7/15/2017 6:31:25 PM
of 275872
 
AMD Threadripper 1950X Trounces Core I9-7900X In Multithreading Benchmark

The Cinebench R15 benchmark is a popular tool for measuring how well CPUs cope with multithreaded compute loads. AMD's Threadripper 1950X 16 core CPU, priced at $999 according to AMD, benchmarks 41% faster in Cinebench R15 than Intel's also $999 10 core Core i9-7900X CPU. While Intel's Core i9-7900X scores 2186 points on Cinebench, AMD's Threadripper 1950X scores 3046 points. Even the cheaper 12 core $799 Threadripper 1920X is over 200 points faster in Cinebench R15 than Intel's Core i9-7900X. Intel has its own 16 core Core i9-7960X in the works, performance yet unknown, priced at $1,699, but AMD's 16 core part currently appears to be a full $700 cheaper than Intel's MSRP. It remaines to be seen who is faster in single-threaded performance -- Intel may take that crown --and what the power consumption of a fully loaded Threadripper looks like compared to its Core i9 counterpart

via Slashdot

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: zax who wrote (275816)7/16/2017 2:11:32 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275872
 
Amazing. A 16 core processor outperforms a 10 core processor in a multithreaded benchmark!

Who would have expected that?

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275817)7/16/2017 2:56:56 PM
From: zax
of 275872
 
41% more performance for the same price.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275817)7/16/2017 4:38:06 PM
From: fastpathguru
of 275872
 
What's amazing is that AMD can offer you 16 cores for the same price Intel sells10 cores for, and kick Intel's ass doing it...

...glue and all.

fpg

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: fastpathguru who wrote (275819)7/16/2017 6:24:09 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 275872
 
fpg

AMD has always been able to lower their price to improve the price/performance ratio. That's hardly something to be proud about because they had to in order to sell their product. The problem has been that they had trouble making money in the process. Will that change? We'll see.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275820)7/16/2017 10:26:49 PM
From: fastpathguru
of 275872
 
In this case AMD "lowered" their unit price to $1k and will make a very nice, effortless profit on each... No yield issues on these dice whatsoever.

fpg

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10