Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

Previous 10 Next 10

To: dougSF30 who wrote (219034)	12/5/2006 3:08:49 PM
From: FJB	of 275869

Doug, You have exceeded the speed limit. No more posts today, or say goodbye for 48hrs. Thanks for your cooperation!

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: jspeed who wrote (219039)	12/5/2006 3:09:04 PM
From: dougSF30	of 275869

The fact that these guys gave AMD's 65nm process their award should be enough to tell you that it's good. Is that a joke? AMD hires a company, and that company gives them an award, and you want investors to take that company's word for it, or pay them for data that AMD has always released publicly in the past? Again, what are they hiding?

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: smooth2o who wrote (219008)	12/5/2006 3:09:16 PM
From: rzborusa	of 275869

Smooth, What CJ said and; The cost to farmers for diesel fuel to grow corn for ethanol makse it totally inefficient However, ethanol fuel is subsidized. Its in style. Get with it, you'll feel all warm and fuzzy.

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read

To: FJB who wrote (219041)	12/5/2006 3:11:14 PM
From: dougSF30	of 275869

Dear Robert, The policy change has not yet taken effect. I'll be more than happy to comply once the voting process is done, and the results are tallied, and any change in rules is made. Thanks for your understanding!

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: dougSF30 who wrote (219044)	12/5/2006 3:12:34 PM
From: FJB	of 275869

I'll be more than happy to comply once the voting process is done, and the results are tallied, and any change in rules is made. Excellent.

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: dr_elis who wrote (219030)	12/5/2006 3:13:32 PM
From: dougSF30	of 275869

Well, Intel is pretty much settled on their 45nm process, as they are producing Penryn samples with it at this point, so something non-immersive must be working to their satisfaction, right?

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read

To: FJB who wrote (219045)	12/5/2006 3:15:32 PM
From: dougSF30	of 275869

Happy to please. You haven't seen any AMD 65nm die photos anywhere have you, by any chance?

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: dougSF30 who wrote (219047)	12/5/2006 3:17:24 PM
From: FJB	of 275869

If I did, I would have linked them already. You aren't in such a state of denial that you don't think AMD is shipping 65nm part, are you? That would be crazy.

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: dougSF30 who wrote (219042)	12/5/2006 3:18:19 PM
From: jspeed	of 275869

No Doug, they are legit. In fact, you have no business creating your half-baked theories when a company like Semiconductor Insights puts their seal of approval on AMD's process.

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (3)

To: jspeed who wrote (219049)	12/5/2006 3:21:37 PM
From: mas_	of 275869

Are his theories ever anything else ? ;-)

Share	KeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (2)