We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology StocksThe *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (46718)2/17/2019 12:33:07 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine
   of 46812
Cisco VNI over the last five years under forecast the actual traffic by nearly 10%.

Wi-Fi traffic is ~free. Hard to put a limit on free.

SuperBowl 53 Internet traffic was 24 PB, a new record

Stephen Hardy should get more comfortable with traffic carried.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (46722)2/17/2019 12:37:26 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine
   of 46812
Hi Elroy,

For ECC SE45 we looked at household Wi-Fi transmit time during the busy hour in 2025.

Video compression results in 4k video by 30 fps becoming 2 GB per hour, so household Wi-Fi
transmissions are < 2% of time per 80 MHz channel.

The compression of the month club is keeping up.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (46719)2/17/2019 1:49:16 AM
From: elmatador
   of 46812
LaGuardia Community College wanted it there and they were betrayed.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (46717)2/17/2019 2:07:48 AM
From: elmatador
   of 46812
It is all here, I seriously doubt the journalists read the book

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: elmatador who wrote (46726)2/17/2019 2:52:16 AM
From: Elroy Jetson
   of 46812
I don't know what journalists should read a book, but American chip makers are not going to relocate their supply chain to thieving Rat-Land.

Chips will continue to be air-shipped from secure facilities in Taiwan, the US and other locations. There is zero reason to accede to China's demands to relocate the supply chain. There's no reason Chinese plants can't wait less than 24 hours for delivery of chips.

The fact that the chip makers trade association says this is what Trump is pressuring them to accept to make him look like he's achieving something demonstrates he understands NOTHING about the China IP theft problem.

China can rather try to reverse engineer the chips and always remain perpetually behind the technology curve. A decade from now that constant failure will bring China enlightenment. Trump will likely be dead by that point.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (46727)2/17/2019 3:27:55 AM
From: elmatador
   of 46812
They want to buy components.

China's top economic-planning agency is proposing an increase in U.S. semiconductor sales to a total $200 billion to China over the next six years, the Journal says, citing U.S. companies briefed on the plan.

They want to guarantee a stash of components to avoid the U.S. doing a ZTE on them.

(The) plan to increase U.S. semiconductor sales to China to a total $200 billion in the next six years — about a five-fold increase over current exports, the Journal reported, citing U.S. companies briefed on the plan.

The olive branch is meant to persuade President Donald Trump to extend a temporary truce over tariffs, according to the report, which cited people with knowledge of the matter.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: elmatador who wrote (46728)2/17/2019 11:29:37 AM
From: Elroy Jetson
   of 46812
China can purchase as many of this year's chips as they prefer.

Think of the safety they'd have secured if they has only begun this program in the year 2000.

They'd have a lifetime supply of year 2000 era chips safely under lock and key.

China can have chips, not chip-making factories. They're not just dealing with a gullible dope like Trump.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (46711)2/17/2019 12:11:09 PM
From: Fiscally Conservative
   of 46812
ERIC has lost Doubled since November ? Where are you getting your data from ? I have ERIC up 12% since November

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Fiscally Conservative who wrote (46730)2/17/2019 1:20:58 PM
From: Elroy Jetson
   of 46812
To repeat what I posted.

ERIC has almost doubled since the November low, but it's clear many investors got into these stocks way too early.

The word "lost" sppears nowhere in the sentence. Please re-read.

Also note, the performance of the US Dollar dollar denominated ADR ERIC is different than the underlying stock ERICB priced in Kroner.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (46719)2/18/2019 6:23:16 AM
From: elmatador
   of 46812
Some clear thinking about Amazon’s ‘shocking’ tax incentives
Simon Black

February 15, 2019

Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

Amazon made big headlines yesterday when it announced it was walking away from its plan to build a new headquarters in New York City.

The company was under intense pressure from the media and politicians who were angered that New York City’s local government was giving away too many tax incentives, purportedly worth around $1.5 billion.

(Including the state government, the total tax break was around $2.8 billion.)

People had some ridiculous idea that NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio was going to hand a check for $1.5 billion over to Jeff Bezos, already the richest man in the world.

Did you know? You can receive all our actionable articles straight to your email inbox... Click here to signup for our Notes from the Field newsletter.

That’s complete nonsense.

The biggest part of the package was a tax credit that would vary based on how much Amazon paid its employees; it was capped at $1.2 billion over ten years.

Let’s assume it’s the maximum level– that works out to be $120 million per year.

Now, in exchange for that incentive, how much tax would Amazon pay?

There’s been a lot of media attention about the fact that Amazon has hardly paid a dime in federal income tax over the past few years.

In both 2017 and 2018, Amazon’s federal tax bill was precisely $0.00.

But state and local tax laws are different than federal laws. And tax breaks that can reduce a company’s federal bill don’t always apply at the state and local levels.

In 2017, for example, Amazon paid $250 million in state and local tax in Washington, its home state.

New York tax rates are MUCH higher than they are in Washington. In fact, New York City has three different methods of calculating corporate tax, just to make sure that big companies pay up.

So even if Amazon’s New York tax bill were just HALF of what it paid in Washington, then New York City would have been recouping more than 100% of its tax incentive EVERY YEAR.

On top of that, the city would have reaped additional tax revenue from countless other sources.

For example, many of the new Amazon jobs would have gone to people relocating to the city.

Even if just 10% of the 25,000 workers (earning $150,000 per year) would have become residents of New York, the city would have earned another $12 million per year in individual income tax revenue.

Property tax revenue would have been another $20 million per year– JUST on the Amazon campus.

Then there’s the city’s nearly 6% hotel occupancy tax. According to company data, Amazon employees and guests accounted for 330,000 hotel room-nights in the Seattle area in 2017.

At roughly $300 per night for a decent New York City hotel, that would have been nearly $6 million in additional annual tax revenue.

None of this, of course, accounts for the gargantuan, indirect economic activity that would have been generated.

Just think about all the real estate agents who would have earned commissions on sales or rentals. Or the waiters and waitresses who would have earned tips at nearby restaurants. Or the countless small businesses that would have benefited.

25,000 Amazon employees would have brought billions in annual disposable income to the city, resulting in tens of millions of dollars in additional tax revenue.

The company itself estimated that they it generate an average $500 million per year in tax revenue for New York City.

Even if Amazon wildly overestimated, and the real benefit was less than half of that figure, New York City would have still earned more than a 100% return on its tax incentive investment.

(And that doesn’t even count the non-financial benefits from the primary school Amazon would have helped build, the tech incubator they were planning, parks and green spaces, or environmentally friendly construction.)

This is incredible. To put that in context, New York City’s pension funds earned an 8.7% return in Fiscal Year 2018. And they’re practically doing a victory lap for knocking out such stellar results.

Yet while they’re pumped beyond belief to earn 8.7%, they had a chance to earn literally 100% or more with Amazon.

And New York City wouldn’t have even had to put up much money; remember, the vast majority of the incentive plan was a tax CREDIT, i.e. Amazon would have merely paid less in tax each year to the local government.

So in terms of a ‘cash on cash’ return, it was nearly infinite. It’s hard to see this as a bad investment.

Yet somehow Socialism won the day.

Ignorant masses, idiotic reporters, and their devious political heroes banded together to thwart prosperity in an endless Shock and Awe campaign against Amazon until the company finally pulled the plug on New York.

What’s probably more revolting is that these people are actually excited. They think that chasing away a near infinite return on investment is a major victory.

This is the direction that the country is turning.

Your fellow comrades don’t make decisions anymore based on facts. There is no rational analysis. It’s all emotion.

They get fired up because a rich guy might benefit. It doesn’t matter that the Amazon deal would have been a much-needed economic boost. They don’t even bother to think. It’s just straight to Twitter.

The same people are quick to say that New York doesn’t need Amazon… the city is going to be just fine.

Wrong again.

As we’ve discussed before, New York City is in a bad place financially. The pension is underfunded by about $70 billion, and the city government runs a multi-billion dollar budget deficit.

Just a few weeks ago, in fact, city officials announced that tax revenues so far this fiscal year were $500 million below forecasts.

Well isn’t that ironic! New York’s $500 million budget hole is the exact estimate of what Amazon would have contributed each year to the city’s treasury.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10