We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsThe New Economy and its Winners

Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (57648)6/20/2019 10:04:09 PM
From: Glenn Petersen
   of 57679
Slack shares surge 48% over reference price in market debut

Published Thu, Jun 20 2019 12:08 PM EDT
Updated 6 hours ago
Lauren Feiner @lauren_feiner
  • Slack surged 48.5% in its first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange. It opened at a share price of $38.50, above the $26 reference price set by the exchange.
  • Slack pursued an unusual direct listing rather than an IPO, meaning it did not have banks underwrite the offering.
  • Slack reported a net loss of $138.9 million on revenue of $400.55 million for the year ended Jan. 31.
Slack surged 48.5% in its debut Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange in a direct listing rather than an initial public offering.

The stock, under the symbol WORK, opened at $38.50, nearly 50% above the reference price of $26 set by the NYSE on Wednesday night.

The pop puts Slack’s market cap at $19.5 billion. As of April, Slack was valued at nearly $17 billion on the secondary market, according to Forge Global, which matches private companies and their employees with investors. In its last financing round in 2018, Slack said it raised $427 million, which brought its valuation to $7.1 billion.

Slack is part of a slew of tech companies to go public this year including Uber, Lyft, Zoom, Pinterest, PagerDuty and CrowdStrike. But it is just the second large tech firm to pursue the unusual direct listing route in the past year and a half. Spotify surprised Wall Street with its decision to list directly onto the New York Stock Exchange last year.

In a direct listing, unlike an IPO, banks do not underwrite the offering, and no new shares are sold, so the company does not receive any additional money for operations. It’s simply a way for existing shareholders to get liquidity by registering their shares for sale on the public market. Plus, Slack doesn’t need to raise more money since it already has more than $800 million in cash on hand. Slack said it engaged Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Allen & Company as financial advisors and several more firms as associate financial advisors to assist it in the process.

While banks typically help determine pricing in an IPO, the NYSE set the reference price for Slack of $26 Wednesday night. The opening price for Slack’s Class A common stock was determined by the buy and sell orders collected by the NYSE from broker-dealers, according to Slack’s prospectus.

Like many tech companies, Slack debuted with a dual-class structure, with Class B shares holding 10 votes per share to consolidate voting power among its top shareholders. According to Slack’s prospectus, Accel is the company’s largest shareholder at 24%, followed by Andreessen Horowitz with a 13.3% stake and Social Capital at 10.2%. Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield owns an 8.6% stake and SoftBank holds 7.3%.

In an interview with CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin ahead of the stock’s debut, Butterfield said Slack’s success foreshadows a change to email as we know it. Conventional email will be phased out in five to seven years, he said.

“Everyone will choose this,” Butterfield said of Slack, which provides a platform for public and private messaging channels.

Slack reported a net loss of $138.9 million on revenue of $400.55 million for the year ended Jan. 31. As of Jan. 31, Slack said it had over 10 million daily active users and saw its number of paid customers increase 49% year over year. Slack also has seen large growth among its highest-paying customers, those who pay over over $100,000 based on annual recurring revenue. The number of customers in that group was up 93% year over year compared with fiscal 2018, according to the prospectus.

Disclosure: Comcast Ventures, the venture arm of Comcast, is an investor in Slack. Comcast owns CNBC parent company NBCUniversal.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Julius Wong6/29/2019 7:40:01 AM
   of 57679
How to Profit in Space: A Visual Guide

The cosmos, long ruled by governments, is now a playground for companies like SpaceX

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Glenn Petersen10/8/2019 8:19:48 PM
   of 57679
Postmates’ new IPO delay says something bigger: Wall Street is turning against Silicon ValleyCan you smell the doom and gloom?

By Theodore Schleifer @teddyschleifer
Oct 8, 2019, 1:10pm EDT

Tech startups imbibe cash and run on optimism. Lately they’re running short on both.

In the latest example of this new reality, Postmates, the food-delivery startup valued at over $2 billion that was expected to go public in 2019, recently told its IPO advisers that it is delaying its initial public offering due to market conditions, according to people familiar with the matter.

Postmates is just one of over a dozen startups worth over $1 billion that was expected to IPO in 2019. But as the end of the year approaches, a gloom is enveloping Silicon Valley, and it’s making for unusual shows of contrition, internal debates in board rooms, and insurgent attempts to change the Wall Street system that keeps delivering bad news to Silicon Valley.

Tech’s highest-profile startups have largely bombed on the stock market since they went public this year: The value of Lyft has been cut in half. Its rival Uber is down over 25 percent. Slack and Peloton are trading well below their IPO prices. And, of course, WeWork’s ambitions crashed into reality when public investors balked at the company’s price tag, leading the company to pull its IPO altogether rather than post its own gnarly red ink.

Postmates CEO Bastian Lehmann said on Friday at a startup conference that the company was closely watching the macroeconomy and indicated that other startups has caused them to second-guess their timing.

“The reality is that we will IPO when we believe we find the right time for the business and the right time in the markets. And if you look at the markets right now, they are, I believe, a little choppy,” he said. “They’re a little choppy when it comes to growth companies specifically.”

Asked if Postmates would go public in 2019, Lehmann said that, “it depends more on the macro than it does on our readiness.”

But a 2019 IPO as of now appears unlikely — and Postmates is at least preparing for the delay. Postmates recently distributed paperwork to shareholders saying that it is pushing back the start of its expected lockup period to about midway through the first quarter of next year, according to people familiar with the matter. That’s at least the second time that Postmates has pushed back the deadline.

Postmates’ decision does make some sense considering how other tech startups have fared in 2019. Yes, some unsexy, profitable software companies are doing fine. But an IPO narrative is set, fairly or unfairly, by the sector’s marquee consumer companies. And it’s clear as 2019 wraps up that the rest of the world does not believe in Silicon Valley as much as Silicon Valley believes in itself.

The 32 tech companies that went public in 2019 have only appreciated in value by an average of about 5 percent, according to Renaissance Capital, which tracks IPO performance. In 2018, that stat was about 13 percent. And in 2017? A 94 percent return rate.

But you don’t need to read IPO stats to see the mood changing. Frustrations manage to manifest themselves in new ways every day in Silicon Valley.

In the most concrete demonstration yet of Silicon Valley’s growing dissatisfaction with the ways in which companies go public, hundreds of investors and founders gathered last week in downtown San Francisco to discuss alternatives to the traditional IPO. For over seven hours, Silicon Valley’s bumper crop of startups imagined a future with Wall Street banks controlling less of their futures, part of a symposium to extol the virtues of what are called direct listings, or “a Simpler and Superior Alternative to the IPO,” as the agenda for the closed-door meeting described them. ( Here’s how direct listings work.)

On Monday, the person who is singularly most responsible for the recent run-up in startup prices, Masayoshi Son, expressed a rare pang of regret. The head of SoftBank, whose Vision Fund is plowing over $100 billion into young companies, said he is “embarrassed and flustered” by his track record in investing.

And the famously optimistic investor — who pushes the founders he backs to be “crazy” and grow to the brink — is now preaching a new message after the IPO flops of SoftBank’s biggest startup bets: Uber and WeWork.

“Recently, I’ve been telling founders to ‘know your limit,’” Son said in an interview with Nikkei Business. “Knowing your limitations will help unleash limitless possibilities.”

And over at Postmates, company leadership has been pumping the brakes amid some internal debates over the ideal time to go public. Postmates confidentially filed its paperwork for an IPO in February but has yet to “flip” its prospectus and formally kick off IPO proceedings. That’s an unusually long time to sit in limbo.

Postmates declined to comment.

But for all the moves beneath the surface, there are deeper cultural and financial reasons that suggest this new gloom won’t actually change anything.

Silicon Valley abhors doomsayers and runs on some collective delusion: Yes, the IPO market might be bad for most companies, but not my company. Investors and startup founders are inclined to wax philosophic about the future of technology, clinging to rosy projections meant to inspire, brand themselves, and make them money. Tech leaders’ fundamental optimism might be genuine, but it is also socially scripted.

Meanwhile, none of the fundamentals of Silicon Valley deal-chasing have changed: Each individual venture capital firm is still desperate to win the favor of the next great company, pushing up valuations in what could be seen as a Tragedy of the Commons. Those ballooning valuations are only pierced when they’re rejected by Wall Street in an IPO.

Even if American startups are overvalued, few individual investors — acting in their own self-interest — are willing to retrench. And 2019’s IPO disappointments aren’t likely to change their minds.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Julius Wong11/19/2019 7:49:55 AM
1 Recommendation   of 57679
Google’s Totally Creepy, Totally Legal Health-Data Harvesting

Google is an emerging health-care juggernaut, and privacy laws weren’t written to keep up.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

From: Julius Wong1/18/2020 2:11:36 PM
   of 57679
These stocks soared even as the companies lost money — here’s why that’s not as crazy as it sounds

Forty-five money-losing companies have at least matched the S&P 1500’s 28% gain over the past year

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Julius Wong who wrote (57658)1/20/2020 6:11:41 PM
From: Bocor
   of 57679
Just use

By passes Google, all the crap, ads, spying etc.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Bocor who wrote (57660)1/20/2020 8:01:07 PM
From: Julius Wong
   of 57679
Thanks for the link.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Julius Wong1/22/2020 8:33:03 AM
   of 57679
Monopoly Power and the Malfunctioning American Economy

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Julius Wong1/23/2020 7:50:10 AM
   of 57679
Debating Whether Big Tech is Taking Over the Stock Market

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Glenn Petersen5/29/2020 10:58:25 AM
   of 57679
Zoom aims to be the next big platform for start-ups to build billion-dollar businesses

Published Fri, May 29 20208:47 AM EDT

Rebecca Fannin, special to

Key Points

-- Zoom teams up with start-ups to fast forward product innovation as competition from tech titans heats up.

-- The company held an app marketplace contest online for start-ups to build new features and functions for Zoom using Zoom APIs.

-- Docket — a start-up in Indianapolis with an app to make meetings more efficient with collaborative agendas, note-taking tools, archives and task steps — won the competition and hopes to raise $2 million in venture capital.

Jim Scheinman, founding managing partner of Maven Ventures and an early investor in Zoom Video Communications, is still betting on the videoconferencing company’s future and on the vision of its founder and CEO Eric Yuan. The company has been on a tear — stoked by the need for its essential services during the pandemic — but as competition nips at its heels from Microsoft, Facebook and Google, there is a need to keep innovating its product line. To achieve that goal, Zoom is teaming up with start-ups building the next big app on its open platform using Zoom APIs.

Zoom has grown to 300 million daily users from its launch in 2013, and its market cap has risen from $15.9 billion at the time of its IPO in April 2019 to near-$50 billion. Maven Ventures has reaped a 200 times return on investment during the start-up’s meteoric rise.

To spur the next wave of growth, Scheinman came up with the idea for an app marketplace contest online for start-ups to build new features and functions for Zoom. In a so-called Whale Watch competition held earlier this month with a virtual backdrop of whales swimming, leaders of 10 tech start-ups who were selected as finalists among 600 contestants presented business plans in Shark Tank-like pitches over Zoom to Scheinman and four other judges. They were: Zoom’s Platform and AI head Wei Lei; Carl Eschenbach, a partner of Sequoia Capital; Santi Subotovsky, general partner of Emergence Capital, and Bart Swanson, advisor of Horizons Ventures who are Zoom investors that also serve on the company’s board.

Each start-up team pitched their made-for-Zoom apps, ranging from Pledgeling for pledging donations and iScribeHealth for virtual physician consultations to Bloom for specialized online classes for kids. Votes came in from an online audience poll while the judges went off-screen to decide and then announce the winner: Docket, a start-up in Indianapolis with an app to make meetings more efficient with collaborative agendas, note-taking tools, archives and task steps.

As the contest champion, Docket stands to receive up to $2 million in funding from the four participating venture firms once due diligence is done, said Darin Brown, co-founder and CEO of Docket, which launched in January 2019 with $1.5 million in VC backing and is one of several apps on Zoom. “For us, it was a no-brainer to roll out our app on Zoom because of the number of users and the deep integration of Docket within the video platform,” said Brown. He expects that Docket will reach 10,000 users by the end of May, up from 3,000 at the beginning of 2020.

The growth and venture funding opportunity for other contestants with innovative apps that ride on Zoom could be huge. “Zoom will be the next big platform for start-ups to build billion-dollar businesses,” Scheinman said. “Of the 10 companies we chose as finalists, every single one has a potential $1 billion business opportunity.”

Zoom’s growing pains

Not many start-ups have experienced a surge like Zoom – from 10 million average daily meeting
participants in December 2019 to more than 300 million each day by late April 2020. “The way people communicate will be forever changed,” noted Eric Yuan, founder and CEO of Zoom Video Communications in San Jose, pointing to such benefits as increased productivity and collaboration, and ease of use. “In the long run, working from home and use of video communications will be more accepted as standard practice in day-to-day business,” he pointed out in an email response.

The once scrappy start-up must keep innovating to stay ahead of established tech titans that have ramped up their own video conferencing services integrated within full product suites. The rebranded Microsoft Teams, which replaces Skype for Business Online for voice calls and video conferencing and functions within the collaborative Microsoft Office 365 platform, added 31 million users in one month and reached 75 million active users by late April. Google’s Hangouts, renamed Google Meet in early April and combined with its portfolio of business services such as Gmail, Docs and Drive, is adding about 3 million users every day and climbed to more than 100 million daily participants.

In addition, Facebook has expanded its video conferencing and chat features while Verizon Business entered the race in mid-April by agreeing to acquire Blue Jeans Network, a cloud-based video conferencing and event platform.

The services have similar features such as screen sharing, gallery views and meeting recordings, and even live transcripts such as from, which has transcribed 25 million meetings. Pricing differs little, ranging from free, limited feature versions to monthly subscriptions of $5 for small teams and $15 and $20 for larger businesses and enterprises.

“The services all do have similar features but the differences come in how various features are de-emphasized in the mix,” said Dan Rothman, president of software development consultancy Flatbridge Technology in New York. He pointed out that Google Meet is good for social grouping because it can be easy to access contacts, while Microsoft Teams is more business oriented, integrated with Office 365.

Beyond the usual start-up growing pains, Zoom also has contended with a needling perception that it’s made in China and subject to foreign spies listening in. In early April, Yuan admitted that some meetings had been mistakenly routed through China, to handle surges in traffic.

Zoom isn’t made in China – rather in Silicon Valley. But Zoom has a large developer team in China to supplement higher-level R&D teams in the U.S. According to researchers at the University of Toronto who studied the potential security issues, some 700 Zoom engineers work in China. Zoom plans to expand in the U.S. with engineering centers in Phoenix and Pittsburgh, and hire 500 engineers in the U.S. over the next few years.

Not a Chinese app

An American citizen, founder Yuan grew up in Shandong province, China, and earned a bachelor’s degree in applied mathematics from Shandong University of Science & Technology and a master’s degree from China University of Mining and Technology and later, in 2006, an Executive MBA from Stanford University. Inspired by the dotcom boom, he moved to the U.S. in 1997, joined video conferencing start-up Webex as a code developer, learned English, and worked his way up through cultural and language barriers to become a v.p. in engineering. He helped to build Webex over 14 years, including a $3.5 billion acquisition by Cisco Systems in 2007, and stayed on for a few years as corporate v.p. of engineering.

With the dream of starting a new, user-friendly cloud-based video service, he left Cisco in 2011 after his idea was rejected and took with him 40 Cisco engineers to start his own company, Saasabee. The start-up was renamed Zoom after early investor Scheinman came up with the name from a children’s book Zoom City he used to read to one of his kids.

When Zoom went public in April 2019, Yuan became a billionaire and his venture investors hit pay day. But as Zoom ballooned in users this year when Covid-19 spread globally, security flaws surfaced. Built for the enterprise market, Zoom was suddenly was being used by consumers to work, study and socialize, explained founder Yuan.

To deal with high-profile problems such as “zoom bombers” suddenly interrupting online meetings, Zoom put a freeze on development of any new products and set up task forces led by executives on a 90-day, fix-it plan, beginning April 1.

Among the fixes that were hastily made: introduced data routing controls so Zoom hosts can choose which data center regions (including China) their meetings use for real-time traffic; added a security icon in the meeting menu bar to secure users’ data in transit; acquired Keybase, a secure messaging and file-sharing service, to accelerate Zoom’s plan to build end-to-end encryption; embedded meeting passwords by default, and named former Facebook and Yahoo chief security officer Alex Stamos as a security consultant.

Fighting goliaths

Despite such fixes, security issues still haunt Zoom. Citing security concerns, Google has banned employees from using Zoom for any business purposes. Other companies including Bank of America and Daimler AG have taken similar measures.

“Zoom has been fighting four or five Goliaths since the day it was born,” said Zoom angel investor Bill Tai. “Microsoft and Google are copying features all the time and Zoom will leave them behind in the dust,” Tai said, who added he is a big believer in the company’s proactive, transparent culture. He was the first to commit to funding Zoom’s founder after the two friends and prior co-investors in tech start-ups Treasure Data and lunched together and discussed Yuan’s idea to make an easy-to-use, high quality video service accessible in the cloud from multiple devices. Tai hasn’t sold any shares in Zoom and proudly counts an investment return of 1,100 times from his bet.

Getting additional funding for Yuan’s start-up idea wasn’t easy but a lengthy memo by Tai finally convinced other angel investors that another video conferencing service could fill a gap in the market and compete in a crowded space against Microsoft-owned Skype and Webex.

“Skype stopped innovating and Webex will live inside Cisco,” Tai said, who added that he “never doubted that Zoom would work. The question was how big this was going to be.”

In early 2013, Zoom picked up $6 million from Maven Ventures, Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang and his firm AME Cloud Ventures, and Qualcomm Ventures. Later that year, Horizons Ventures, the private investment unit of Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-Shing, led a $6.5 million second investment. In 2015, Zoom raised $30 million from existing investors and Emergence Capital, then $100 million led by Sequoia Capital in January 2017 before Zoom’s IPO in April 2019 when it was already profitable.

Zoom’s 90-day fix-it plan is ending on June 30 and the while the U.S. economy is reopening, challenges for the company aren’t going away. The app marketplace that Zoom and its venture investors are working on to introduce new features and functions could give Zoom an edge it needs in this new world of online everything.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10