SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PastimesClown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: koan who wrote (436233)9/13/2024 7:21:04 PM
From: h_
1 Recommendation   of 436255
 
Kaxinawá tribe

news.mongabay.com

"Of 80 people in the Kaxinawá village, four are over 90." But that's impossible without GMOs, Pfizer, Moderna, GSK, Novartis, etc. according to you, LOL.

I'll listen to anybody, to a point, but when they try to sell me on the Rockefeller health tenet that disease is caused by petrochemical derived pharmaceutical deficiency, I stop listening, because they're scammers and criminals.

Don't tell me whom I should listen to you. I sure as hell am going to stop listening to you because you're wrong and making things up, like the absurdity that 400 ppm of CO2 can have any appreciable effect on the temperature of the planet compared to water vapour, cosmic rays, the Earth's magnetic field variations and sunspot/orbit cycles.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: h_ who wrote (436235)9/13/2024 7:22:43 PM
From: Broken_Clock
2 Recommendations   of 436255
 
lmao!

koan is a type of nut grown in California. Can be highly toxic.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: koan who wrote (436234)9/13/2024 11:59:22 PM
From: maceng2
   of 436255
 
"Imagine thinking that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate (IPCC) is an actual legitimate scientific organization and seeing this diagram:"

7 Decades of Net Solar Radiation – Zoe's Insights (wordpress.com)

and if you read all the comments, you will see .... exactly what you have said... censorship is the only response... hardly scientific.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: maceng2 who wrote (436237)9/14/2024 1:09:19 AM
From: maceng2
   of 436255
 
"On August 10, 2021, the Biden-Harris National Security Council (NSC) hosted a cozy little chat with the United Kingdom’s “ Counter Disinformation Unit” (CDU). The occasion? An instructional session on how to manage—read: censor—COVID-related speech in the US But why stop at the pandemic when there’s so much more to control? This wasn’t just about virus talk; it was a step-by-step guide on how to choke off the flow of any inconvenient truth that might muddy the government’s preferred narrative."

Behind Closed Doors: The UK and US Plot Global Speech Crackdown (reclaimthenet.org)

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: maceng2 who wrote (436238)9/14/2024 4:34:07 AM
From: maceng2
   of 436255
 
Beyond the Law

" On September 14th, 2001, President George W. Bush signed Proclamation 7463 declaring a “National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks.” The measure activates over 400 additional provisions of executive authority and has been re-signed every year by every succeeding president, including four times by Donald Trump. As discussed on the new America This Week, Joe Biden just signed its latest renewal, effective tomorrow, noting the threat of twenty-three years ago “continues”:"

Beyond the Law - by Matt Taibbi - Racket News

America This Week, September 13, 2024: (racket.news)

America This Week, September 1 - America This Week - Apple Podcasts

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: maceng2 who wrote (436237)9/14/2024 10:05:10 AM
From: koan
   of 436255
 
I am sorry, but you really have it all figured wrong.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: h_ who wrote (436235)9/14/2024 10:19:05 AM
From: koan
   of 436255
 
You seem sort of unhinged, and paranoid.

I didn't say anything about those two paragraphs you posted below.

I said nothing about the Rockefeller health tenet, or the 400 PPM, or any of it.

And how am I making anything up when all I said is we should listen to the worlds scientists who are the most educated people on the planet about global warming.

All I said, which makes all the sense in the world, is listen to the 10's of thousands of PHD Atmospheric scientists on the planet from every nation, who, for all practical purposes are saying the SAME THING i.e. man made global warming is a very big danger warming the planet to a dangerous level!

That is all I am saying.

And for you to think all the worlds scientists have sold out, or are dumber than Joe Blow from Idaho, is delusional!

<

h: I'll listen to anybody, to a point, but when they try to sell me on the Rockefeller health tenet that disease is caused by petrochemical derived pharmaceutical deficiency, I stop listening, because they're scammers and criminals.

Don't tell me whom I should listen to you. I sure as hell am going to stop listening to you because you're wrong and making things up, like the absurdity that 400 ppm of CO2 can have any appreciable effect on the temperature of the planet compared to water vapour, cosmic rays, the Earth's magnetic field variations and sunspot/orbit cycles.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: koan who wrote (436241)9/14/2024 12:10:33 PM
From: Broken_Clock
   of 436255
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: koan who wrote (436240)9/14/2024 12:17:31 PM
From: maceng2
   of 436255
 
<<I am sorry, but you really have it all figured wrong>>>

Em?

NAH. No way, as things stand. Too much b/s out there that we are being told by governments and authorities as being true. Only they are not.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: koan who wrote (436241)9/14/2024 12:23:31 PM
From: h_
2 Recommendations   of 436255
 
I must have misread the title of this thread; my apologies. I thought it said "Clown-FREE Zone." You have only ad hominem and appeal to authority. You fail to understand that "education" is the problem here. An "education" from controlling interests with an agenda can only produce students that advance that agenda, since they don't know that they're wrong, just like you.

Every one of those $cientists depends on toeing the line to put food on his table. Why would they shut off that spigot? <Insert famous Upton Sinclair quote here.> BTW, get with the program, it's no longer "global warming," it's "climate change," because that allows them to blame any uncomfortable weather on a specious demon that is actually plant food which the world has been shown to be benefitting from due to its slight increase already. Guess what? The Earth doesn't owe any of us nice weather.

It has been unusually nice weather on the whole for several decades, but prior to that it was much less nice. It's not unreasonable to expect that these phenomena are cyclic and are due to forces that dwarf anything man can do by many orders of magnitude. I always laugh when the nightly news (propaganda, rather) exclaims that extreme weather records from the 1930s or 1940s were broken as though that were some evidence that it's all going to Hell. Does it not occur to them or their sycophantic audience that if we had those records stand for almost 100 years, it's evidence that things can't be that bad? Why is Mars heating up? Is it the SUV-driving Martians? Who's unhinged or paranoid here?

And if you plan on furthering your writing career, it would behoove you to learn the purpose of the apostrophe in the English language, because it's not what you think it is, as you demonstrated in more ways than one in your latest post.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)
Previous 10 Next 10