SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.

   PastimesMurder Mystery: Who Killed Yale Student Suzanne Jovin?


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: RandomCitizen who wrote (1365)3/17/2016 10:58:55 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell
   of 1385
 
I agree with everything you wrote except the last sentence: "That's why they're looking for that person in that taxi, because it was in that area [where the running man lived]."
Investigators are also trying to find a woman who was a passenger in a taxi that night. “She may have important information to corroborate existing information provided by the taxi driver,” Edwards said in the statement. Edwards said she has been described as a black woman in her late 30s or early 40s. She was wearing a white outfit such as one worn by a health care worker and was carrying a paper bag with handles. She was picked up by the cab driver at either 333 or 373 Blatchley Ave. at about 9:15 p.m. Before she got into the taxi, she spoke with a person who was standing on the second-floor porch of that building. The cab driver dropped her off in Newhallville.

Edwards’ statement also cites the account of a witness who was driving on Whitney Avenue, then turned onto East Rock Road, where he heard an argument as he approached the Edgehill Road intersection. Message 30346489
I mean, I truly wish the police considered the running man as their prime suspect, but I've seen no evidence they do. If you chart the route from 333 (or 373) Blatchley Ave to Newhallville where the taxi ride began, you'll see that the ride doesn't start anywhere near the Wooster St area where the running man lived at the time. However, there's a reasonable chance the taxi got to Newhallville by turning left off Whitney onto East Rock, which would have taken it past the murder scene. As the running man ran down Huntington, it's unlikely he and the cab crossed paths.

So what could the taxi driver have offered that he observed or heard that night? I get the distinct impression that the police are operating on the theory that the arguing couple overheard all the way down near the East Rock/Whitney intersection was Jovin and her killer. So what are the odds the witness who heard the argument while driving was also the cab driver? That would explain the need for a second opinion.

I don't blame the police for wanting to talk to this mystery passenger. I'm assuming the cab driver must have been one of the many leads the police got right after the murder. Apparently the passenger did not submit a lead. But unless she somehow observed the murder whereas the driver did not (and somehow saw fit to keep silent all these years), it seems the best we'd get out of her is that she also heard a couple arguing. As I've written before, the timeframe for this arguing couple to be Jovin and her killer is almost an impossibility... which brings us back to banging our heads against the wall about why the running man seems to now be an afterthought.

- Jeff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: SJ Cold Case7/26/2016 7:09:38 AM
   of 1385
 
Jeffrey - thank you for your dedication to this case and for this SI thread that has been kept alive all these years.

I believe that Suzanne's killer may have made multiple posts in this thread.
How far back is it possible to obtain IP addresses and ISP provider locations?
How likely is it that I will be blown off (due to my inexperience) by the current investigative team?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SJ Cold Case who wrote (1367)7/27/2016 1:13:49 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell
   of 1385
 
I believe that Suzanne's killer may have made multiple posts in this thread.
I've asked the Admin here on SI to address the IP question.

Which posts are you referring to?!

- Jeff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1368)7/27/2016 8:43:20 AM
From: SJ Cold Case
   of 1385
 
Jeff,

I can't be too careful here, and have sent you a PM.

Although I sincerely believe I am on to something, I wouldn't want to falsely accuse the wrong person.

The ultimate goal is a confession, and we need to research IP address(es) to go down this path.

I also want the reward if I am correct.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: SJ Cold Case7/27/2016 9:15:18 AM
   of 1385
 
Would scent dogs be able to identify another person from Suzanne's clothing - if the clothing she wore during the attack is still in evidence?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: SJ Cold Case7/27/2016 9:21:36 AM
   of 1385
 
The IP address(es) I would be looking for posted here in 2000 quite a bit. The last activity on SI was in 2003.
The person has moved to another state, so we would be looking for closed accounts.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: SJ Cold Case7/28/2016 1:04:20 PM
   of 1385
 
If Yale just wants Suzanne's murder story to go away

and police don't want to admit mistakes

and quoted witness statements are unexpected

(noting sensitivity and possible deception),

What is to be done?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SJ Cold Case who wrote (1372)7/28/2016 3:58:05 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell
   of 1385
 
What is to be done?
Good question. If you read the archives, you'll see a bunch of us have suggested what needs to be done, but to no avail. Heck, I've even offered to raise whatever money it takes to pay for the cost of implementing our suggestions.

Battling both Yale and the State of CT (not just New Haven) has proven to be like scaling Everest wearing a wet bathing suit. Only when an entity of equal or greater stature applies pressure on them will there ever be any incentive for cooperation-- and only because "covering up" is quite often these days viewed worse than the actual accusations, not because they truly want the truth to be known.

IMHO of course. :)

- Jeff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1373)7/29/2016 11:06:14 AM
From: SJ Cold Case
   of 1385
 
"Only when an entity of equal or greater stature applies pressure on them will there ever be any incentive for cooperation--"

I wonder if anyone at Harvard Law would be interested?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell11/5/2016 12:38:07 AM
   of 1385
 
In memory of Michelle McNamara (wife of actor and comedian Patton Oswalt)

Back in 2009, I had the pleasure of spending some time talking and emailing with true-crime writer Michelle McNamara, wife of actor/comedian Patton Oswalt. Every so often I would send her updates. Michelle passed away suddenly in her sleep back in April. My condolences.

Michelle's story: truecrimediary.com

More about her life: latimes.com

- Jeff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10