We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology (GMTN) Selling Earth-friendly Energy

Previous 10 
To: Melismatics who wrote (11)6/18/1999 10:08:00 PM
From: dotcomboy
   of 21 = They are *rarely* right about IPOs <eom>

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: QuietWon who wrote (9)6/19/1999 11:59:00 AM
From: e.von
   of 21
Hey Won,
Thanks for Greenmountain specs, GMTN looks interesting. I have a position in Keystone KESE they seem to have a lot in common. I was just out in LA and San Diego seems to be plenty of expansion.
Erick von Alroth

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: dotcomboy who wrote ()6/20/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: Kevin Clarke
   of 21
Heres a little information for you Dot.
Checkout the sponsor of this celebration and look at the individuals that attended.
Should be an interesting IPO, to say the least.
Take care

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Melismatics who wrote (11)6/22/1999 8:45:00 PM
From: Trevor Goodchild
   of 21's ratings look to be based on empirical data related to the underwriter and co-underwriters. It looks to be a mathematical rating only. In other words, anything underwritten by Goldman Sachs will have a good rating; anything underwritten by one of the smaller Investment banks with a poor track record will not. Think of it as a power rating. GS is less likely to be the underwriter on losers and they have enough institutional leverage to support the markets of the so-so companies. Some of these Investment banks just don't have the rolodexes, clientele, capital, and pull on the market to support some of these IPOs. Remember, every time a person flips his shares, the market maker has to buy those shares if they want to protect the price. Also remember that quite a bit of their compensation is tied to their ability to overallocate shares for themselves at the IPO price.

I think GS will guarantee a succesful IPO for GMTN, however, whether that holds for 30 days (my criteria) is the issue.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Trevor Goodchild who wrote (15)6/23/1999 9:11:00 PM
From: Bob Zeleznik
   of 21
So now the offering price range has been lowered and they've
halved the number of shares. Obviously demand wasn't what
was expected. Will this discount strategy pay off and attract
new interest, or is this just clearly a dud?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Bob Zeleznik who wrote (16)6/23/1999 11:22:00 PM
From: Teddy
   of 21
i glanced at the Prospectus a couple of weeks ago and figured there would be little interest in the IPO. It is not really a 'net company and deregulation in the electric industry is state by state and moving slowly.

Maybe i'd buy 100 shares @$3 to get that warm fuzzy feeling of doing something Green.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Teddy who wrote (17)6/25/1999 2:58:00 PM
From: Glenn Petersen
   of 21
>>It is not really a 'net company...<<

Good observation. The following article is from

Dot.Frauds on the Run June 25, 1999
By Chris Nerney
Senior Analyst Stock Report Archives
The game could be up for those non-Internet companies dressed in

Dazed and panicky investors may not have fully appreciated the beneficial effects of the recent Internet stocks slump, but it's now clear that the newly skeptical atmosphere has had one immediate and positive impact: Bogus Internet companies are being exposed and punished.

And these companies know it. You can bet that's why Vermont-based pushed back its IPO from Thursday to next week, reduced the number of shares it will offer from 25 million to 12 million shares and cut the price range from $11-$13 to $9.

Company executives and the IPO's underwriters, including Prudential Securities and BancBoston Robertson Stephens, clearly must have known the market would never swallow a $250 million offering from a company with $1.5 million in revenue and $46 million in losses in 1998, especially a purported "Internet" company that does what does.

Which is to resell electricity generated from "green" power resources such as wind, geothermal and landfill gas (gas from a landfill is "green"?) to customers in California and Pennsylvania. Formed in 1997 as Green Mountain Energy Resources, the company says "more than 99% of our revenues have come from green electricity sales" in those two states.

Here's's link to the Internet: It has a Web site offering green educational information to users and runs banner ads on Yahoo! Yeah, supposedly it "markets" its services online, but so what? I'm sorry, but as noble as the company's goals may be, none of that makes it a dot.anything.

Another Internet phony was hammered last week.

Streamline, a Boston-area food delivery company, closed on its first day of trading last Friday at $7.63, or 24% below its $10 offer price. If you consider Streamline an Internet company, that's the worst debut of the year for a 'Net IPO.

But Streamline is hardly a pure 'Net play. The company was formed six years ago to deliver food and other consumer items to households in and around Boston. Customers could place orders via phone or fax. Now the majority of orders are received through the Internet.

All well and good, but surely not an "Internet" play in the manner of a Lycos, eToys or Wit Capital.

I say it's time to out these Internet imposters. I'll be scouring the S-1s for clues about who is and who isn't a real Internet company.

To make this determination, I will ask the following: Would this company exist if the Internet did not exist? If the answer is no, then it's an Internet company. If it is yes, as is the case with Streamline and, then it simply is not an Internet company.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (18)6/28/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: BC
   of 21
When is the IPO coming out?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: BC who wrote (19)6/28/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: Glenn Petersen
   of 21
Ostman's IPO Alert has them listed for this week.

Barron's also has them listed as coming out this week.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (20)6/29/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: Mark Kubo
   of 21
This just reported in -

The debut of (GMTN:Nasdaq), an Internet retailer of environmentally friendly electricity products, was postponed due to market conditions after the company slashed its proposed offering to 12 million shares from 25 million and cut the offering range to around $9 from $11 to $13.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10