SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsAnthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Done, gone. who wrote (94447)6/16/2006 4:12:04 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!
   of 122084
 
Whew!!!

Thank God he didn't complain about bashers, shorters and naked shorts...

Come to think of it, he didn't mention gullible speculators either...

EK!!!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (94466)6/16/2006 4:18:52 PM
From: Done, gone.
   of 122084
 
Been a while since a shareholder pointed their finger -- with some vehemence -- in what seems to be the correct direction, hasn't it? Here, or anywhere else, for that matter.

Anyway, noticed the dood's been banned by only one person, thus far.

siliconinvestor.com

Not at all a surprise as to who pressed the ban button. No surprise at all. Zero. Double zero.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: rrufff who wrote (94461)6/16/2006 4:36:59 PM
From: tonto
   of 122084
 
This sure is a nice thread...(s)

Jeff - that's your opinion and I disagree totally. From what I see of Weiss, he is a sort of Cramer wannabee in print, yelling and screaming. With respect to his diatribes on this issue, he comes across as lacking substance.

How's that for calm?

LOL

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: tonto who wrote (94468)6/16/2006 4:42:14 PM
From: rrufff
   of 122084
 
Yes it is LOL

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Francois Goelo who wrote (79096)6/16/2006 6:11:17 PM
From: StockDung
   of 122084
 
THE MIGHTY DUTTON PROFILES YET ANOTHER STOCKFRAUD gsk-law.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: tonto who wrote (94468)6/16/2006 6:34:20 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell
   of 122084
 
Note the use of the phrase "From what I see..." Well, gee, from what I see, Joe DiMaggio was just an old guy shilling Mr. Coffee machines. Whatever. :)

- Jeff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (94471)6/16/2006 6:38:01 PM
From: rrufff
   of 122084
 
From what I see here, it's a case of "my scam is ok, yours is not."

Yes, "whatever...."

rrufff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: StockDung who wrote (94470)6/16/2006 10:26:24 PM
From: RockyBalboa
   of 122084
 
Interesting. Is CESV worth nothing at all and are those revenues and profits a lie, or? While the center of the allegations refers to excessive stock sales and dubious private placement practises, no doubts have been cast on the company itself. And at 40c - this makes it a cheap company even if it owns only 10c instead of perhaps 50c. Is it a total fraud?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Francois Goelo who wrote (79096)6/17/2006 9:15:08 PM
From: StockDung
   of 122084
 
SEDONA Corporation

Notes: The Company has not paid any compensation for this Company Profile or for its inclusion at this Web site. The Research Works, Inc. ("RW") performed research services for this Company during the years 1993-97 and received a warrant to purchase 70,000 common shares in compensation for such services; RW no longer holds either that warrant or the shares into which such warrant were converted. The author of this report owns shares of this Company?s common stock. web.archive.org

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Francois Goelo who wrote (79096)6/18/2006 7:24:50 AM
From: StockDung
   of 122084
 
SHILL TO HACK By RODDY BOYD

nypost.com

June 18, 2006 -- Jerome Armstrong, the political strategist who followed a famous Internet fundraising effort for Howard Dean in 2004 with a book on "people-powered politics," has a sordid past as a shill for a worthless dot-com stock.

Armstrong, 42, touted a dubious Chinese software company, BluePoint, beginning in 1999, without disclosing that he accepted "below-market" shares in exchange for the glowing reports he posted on a site called Raging Bull, according to a 2003 civil suit that named him as a defendant.

"Armstrong posted over 80 times on the BluePoint message board located on the Raging Bull Web site in the first three weeks [it traded]," reads the complaint, filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

At no point in any of the 80 posts did Armstrong disclose he was paid for the service, the suit alleged. In fact, The Post has uncovered hundreds of Armstrong posts from 1999 to 2003, many supporting now virtually or entirely worthless stocks.

Armstrong denied to The Post that he did anything wrong and said the SEC made a mistake in charging him. "This was a long time ago and I settled the case without admitting or denying guilt, and I paid no fine," said Armstrong, who refused to comment further.

Armstrong signed off on a settlement of the charges on Dec. 16, 2003, barring him from touting securities. In addition, Armstrong agreed never to deny any of the SEC charges. It was not immediately known if his statement to The Post denying guilt would violate the settlement agreement.

Considered an authority on political blogging and 'Net campaigning, Armstrong's MyDD.com is a trendsetter in liberal circles.

A frequent subject of glowing media profiles on the growing role of the Internet in campaigning, Armstrong now directs Internet strategy for 2008 presidential hopeful Mark Warner.

The sharp partisan flair Armstrong shows on his blog was apparently honed in bitter message-board fights, where he was known for his attacks on those questioning the stocks he touted.

Floyd Schneider, a New Jersey mortgage broker and investigator of penny-stock scams, said he was a repeated target of Armstrong's attacks because he criticized the finances and business models of firms Armstrong supported.

"[Armstrong] was among the nastiest and ugliest stock touts from that era," said Schneider. "The stocks he touted were dogs and rigged, so it makes sense that he had a deal with promoters."

roddy.boyd@nypost.com


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10