We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsAnthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Bill from Wisconsin who wrote (103251)4/8/2008 11:27:49 AM
From: willjeffers2
   of 122062
Hopefully they wont put too much credence into the paranoid, delusional charlatans like patch-job.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: StockDung4/8/2008 11:41:53 AM
   of 122062
Making Millions From Fraud
April 7, 2008, 4:21 pm

The S.E.C. today filed a civil fraud complaint against the promoters of CMKM Diamonds, a tiny stock that never sold for as much as three cents a share, and was often under a penny. But it turns out you can get rich even at those prices, at least if you issue billions of shares illegally.

This case may not have set any speed records for filing, but it is worth reading, at least for those who have focused on the evil of naked short selling. The fraud, the S.E.C. alleges, took place from 2003 to 2005. I wrote about it in a column in the fall of 2006, noting an enforcement action by NASD, now known as FINRA, regarding the issuance of billions of shares for no apparent reason.

As the S.E.C. tells it, “CMKM’s C.E.O. Urban Casavant generated investor interest in the company through false press releases, Internet chat boards, and “funny car” race events across the country without disclosing that he ran the company from his house in Las Vegas and that CMKM’s primary activity was to issue and promote its own stock.”

The commission claims that Mr. Casavant and others made $64 million by fraudulently selling hundreds of billions of shares of illegally issued stock.

And how were the buyers fooled? Here is the S.E.C. explanation, from the suit filed in Federal District Court in Nevada:

“To divert attention from their own dumping of CMKM shares, Casavant persuaded CMKM’s investors that the reported high trading volume in CMKM stock reflected extensive ‘naked short selling’ rather than ordinary stock dilution.”

When I wrote that column, I got an e-mail message from a reader, which I reported in a blog item. It read:

“Mr Norris…What possibly could be the reason you wrote about a worthless little pennystock…CMKM Diamonds..and placed it on the first page of the NY Times business section. Could it possibly be that the company has just about implicated every major brokerage firms in the country in the systematic rape of the American people due to the insidious practice of NAKED SHORT SELLING…COUNTERFEITING….Your boss’s on Wall Street will have to do some heavy spin on this one Floyd…”

Do you think that reader will admit he was fooled? I don’t.

Comments (21)
E-mail this
21 comments so far...
April 7th,
4:47 pm
If Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe doesn’t want to succeed Bernanke as the National Money Printer, what about Urban Casavant?

— Posted by MARK KLEIN, M.D.

April 7th,
5:26 pm
No mention of Roger Glenn an attorney that represented CMKM Diamonds or Robert Mahue, the Trustee of this company (Former Alter Ego of Howard Hughes)…..why is that? Does anyone think “Sting”, “Set Up”….we’ll see.

— Posted by CMKM Shareholder

April 7th,
5:35 pm
Floyd, glad to see you’re still following this story closely. Back in 2006 you replied to one of my comments to you by stating that you didn’t “know how big a problem f.t.d’s were in our markets. You have recently pulled that comment down. Any comment as to your timing? I wanted to highlight it considering Chris Cox’s recent work with 10B-21. Would love to read your thoughts as to where you are now with naked short selling.


Floyd Norris replies: To my knowledge, nothing has been taken off the blog.

— Posted by jfarn

April 7th,
6:05 pm
The point still is Floyd that when billions upon billions in subprime mortgage losses were being set up, you were writing about a penny stock, with less than $100 million in stock sales. that’s less than one of a good payout for Countrywide execs.

— Posted by Sidney

April 7th,
6:16 pm
floyd, got little problem with the story but one….If you read the SEC notice, they went after NevWest for selling massive levels of shares on behalf of John Edwards. The SEC claiming that they should have suspected something.

Fact is, NevWest was in constant communication with the SEC regarding each cert Edwards came in with. The SEC attorney responsible for investigating CMKX was providing NevWest with instructions to sell the shares each time they contacted her.

The reason this fraud reached the levels it did was because the SEC was witnessing it for a tremendous amount of time (like they did mutual fund late trading/market timing) and took a controllable fraud into an uncontrollable one.

Today, many of those brought up on charges have fled the country.

— Posted by Don't be fooled

April 7th,
7:25 pm
There was no “sting”, only an SEC investigation that netted a bunch of insiders on fraud charges. Glenn and Mahue did nothing and were engaged in nothing. They were on the payroll when all this insider fraud was taking place. Anybody that does not see that now that this news is out is clearly in denial.

— Posted by Get Real

April 7th,
7:36 pm
I don’t know this stock for anything; I do believe that in some companies, management was in on dumping the companies. I might even have been burned in one. Not sure, but it is odd a corporate officer would buy a 150,000 dollar custom built shotgun. Oh well. Water under the dam.

However, I find it odd that someone of your stature continues to beat this drum. With all the news about Bear Stearns, with Dick Fuld saying publically he has proof Bear was manipulated, why do continue to visit this mud hole but to push the spotlight off what hurts?

Good grief. Even Jim Cramer loves the Baloney Brigade. He wants to join, but we’re sorta picky; he’s a little looney even for us.

— Posted by lenofus

April 7th,
7:47 pm

thank you for helping the US Fed become non private and bear stearns get a black eye.


you just took the bait!

— Posted by Ramon

April 7th,
7:48 pm

Stop. Back in 2006 you worked rather hard to refute that Naked Short Selling a.k.a. fails to deliver existed to a point where they might have any impact in the market. Are you going to deny such a position?

You asked a former CMKM investor to state that he/she was fooled. I ask you to comment on 10B-21 and how Cox’s recent work conflicts with your earlier assumptions. Have some courage Floyd and at the very least, demonstrate what you asked that CMKX poster to do today.


— Posted by jfarn

April 7th,
7:50 pm
jfarn, No post of yours was removed from this blog.

And there was never a significant FTD in this stock. The data from the DTCC has been published. At the same time the flake lawyer for the company was claiming “TRILLIONS” of naked shorts, the actual FTD’s amounted to a hundred bucks of stock.

— Posted by star.the.wonder.pup

April 7th,
7:50 pm
Folks you all can say what you want, along with the SEC, DTCC, AND MM’S. We are not stupid!!! NSS is abig problem, and it will not go away. The SEC never mention Roger Glenn or Robert Mahue and a few others. Plus the SEC should of never even let this company out on the internet trading CMKM certs. The SEC is gone and for a good reason, plus if most investors look on there trading statment, you can see that even the SEC was making money off the trades. Might not be all that much, but you still took money from the investor. But I think that soon, people will start to see that the market is not as safe as everyone thinks it is. New motto is: Make your money and get the hell out.


— Posted by Dan Schoonover

April 7th,
7:56 pm
CMKX was a scam before one share was ever sold. I have been blowing the sirens on this scam for 5 years on Raging Bull. Costing me over 5,000 different aliases because I get removed for posting truth. Now that the SEC charges are out, the few remaining faithful are still spinning the truth into the fact that this is all a part of the master plan constructed by Urban.

Then there are the Paltalk rooms that have literally 100’s of not the brightest people on Earth that pay room rent just to listen to the rantings of the cult leaders that Urban created.
CMKX was not only a scam, but it ended up being a sickness that none of these people will ever recover from.

The real Jonas Grumby

— Posted by Jonas Grumby

April 7th,
7:59 pm
I would just like to say it is great that this is out in the open and that people know about the BS that transpired with cmkm. I guess everyone thought we (cmkm shareholders) would just go away. NOT!!!!!!!!!!!

— Posted by jbeezy

April 7th,
8:30 pm
Just another wall street reporter saving there fraudulent market again. You have no respect from me too much BS you spin. Why did ex-SEC lawyer Roger Glen hired by Urban raises the AS? The greedy crooked market makers & brokers got so fat at the table they couldn’t get out the door. Why would an ex-FBI agent named Robert Mahue be on the board of directors of CMKM Diamonds? Was to catch those fat greedy market makers & brokers they locked them in with a cert pull. SEC was so infiltrated by wall streeters they were oozing manipulation everywhere. SEC wouldn’t let a short squeeze happen they would save shorty’s butt & just halt the company and falsely accuse the co. of pump & dump. Bear raids were just ok with the SEC faster they went down the better. Just disgusting! Just the fact they created the SHO list ought to make you want to puke. No such thing as counterfeited stocks? pfff sucker!

— Posted by Foolish Reporters

April 7th,
8:48 pm
The SEC is no angel in this matter and that is why today they are handling this mess. They can cover up thier tracks all they want but the fact is they were all in this together. They can make up all the stories they want and sugar coat it but the fact is that there are thousands of cmkx shareholders that have suffered for over 4 yrs now a lot of which spend thier life savings. Some have got sick and died in this time and that is the major story here.

— Posted by snowy

April 7th,
10:10 pm

I am an avid Times reader and know some of your columnists well. Your lack of objectivity with regard to naked short selling is on par with RUTENBERG’s, THOMPSON’s, KIRKPATRICK’s and LABATON’s hack job on McCain. What is going on with my beloved paper?

Your slant is a bit much to handle Floyd as evidenced by the lackey’s coming to your defense.

I am a bit miffed as to why you didn’t pay much mind to a near systemic meltdown and you’re playing I told you so with some penny stock investor from two years ago.

Keep your eye on the ball: What you say about Cox’s comments and work with 10b-21 and do still dismiss any significance of NSS and its effects on our markets?

April 7th,
7:50 pm

jfarn, No post of yours was removed from this blog.

And there was never a significant FTD in this stock. The data from the DTCC has been published. At the same time the flake lawyer for the company was claiming “TRILLIONS” of naked shorts, the actual FTD’s amounted to a hundred bucks of stock.

— Posted by star.the.wonder.pup

— Posted by jfarn

April 7th,
11:58 pm
WE SHAREHOLDERS waited so long to see this come out. THIS is MASSIVE. They are not getting away from this NAKED SHORT SELLING.

— Posted by WAITED SO LONG

April 8th,
1:33 am
Floyd, to write about one company is one thing, to imply that all companies that have state that their shares have been manipulated by naked selling is outright irresponsible. You have no first hand knowledge to support such an implication. Could it be possible that the Inspector General of the SEC, the Chairman of the SEC, Jim Cramer and Barney Frank have it ALL WRONG…………..don’t think so, but nice try lumping CMKM with all the others….

— Posted by thegameisover

April 8th,
5:15 am
How many times Wall Street crooks have quietly agreed to pay penalties . In fact the Wall Street crooks have been charged, and paid huge fines,Talk about cover up’s on what Spiter was really doing,who really wanted him out of the way…They really go after the guy’s who is trying to do his job…
If the claims in canada were fake or was not real or had no valuable,why do you think DeBeers would be fighting this little mining co. for claim’s long ago…How come sec took such interest so long Foyd ? Think………
Major story here, you bet…
I want to know how many more small companies were unexpectedly nake shorted..
Sec let the dog’s roam main street, then slap wall street on the rist,sec got their money and let the dog’s out to bit someone else..Sounds like a partnership, hay hay.. Part of the National Trust is to invest in a small business we thought.
If this hole story got out ,no one would trust wall street or any stock ever..!
To put good hard working people though this most unkind suffering is just shame on America, and to not beleive what 40,000 shareholders were saying about how they were getting taken.. It is unbelievable that such cruelty and injustice is occurring right here on American soil.If all of this story got out to the world what other country would trust us…They don’t trust us now because of the war..
Congess is on the wrong side of our America….
It took 40,000 shareholder’s to make new rule’s to protect the next investor…These people should receive high honers in both state and national..
We need more people like them to wake up America..
Stay stong cmkx cmkm …good job…
America wake up or you won’t have a house to smell your coffee in……………!

— Posted by sena

April 8th,
7:25 am
Spare me. The story is how a con man and his affiliates created a cult of naif “investors” who somehow thought they would be millionaires from a hundred buck investment.

— Posted by star.the.wonder.pup

April 8th,
9:41 am
Kind of interesting, how both this and the USXP articles raise the same sort of response. Some people on either side (it’s a scam or it’s a conspiracy against the company), both very vocal (and sometimes rather desparate-sounding) plus some people shooting the messenger.

In response to the latter group, I’d point out that there’s plenty already being written about BSC, so a post by Mr Norris on that every day would be a bit uninteresting. In fact, given the high profile of the BSC fiasco, CDOs, MBSs, CDSs, Thornburg et al., a look at how the “small” scammers are still operating, and how they’re making (usually small investors’) lives a misery, is both interesting and informative.

In any case, the level of posting (on either side) in response to these posts indicates that they are indeed newsworthy.

— Posted by Lew from York, UK

Add your comments...
Name Required E-mail Required (will not be published) Comment

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: StockDung4/8/2008 11:43:31 AM
   of 122062
The SEC Cracks a Naked Short Nut-Case
Monday, April 07, 2008

In the "Baloney Blitzkrieg" chapter of Wall Street Versus America, I describe the looniness surrounding a grimy little diamond mining shell company called CMKM Diamonds -- a company that barely existed except for a share-generating mechanism, a loudmouth CEO named Urban Casavant, and a handful of exceedingly stupid shareholders who made fools of themselves on picket lines when they weren't sending threatening emails to journalists and regulators.

It was a good example of how a small group of determined crackpots can cause damage to our regulatory system, in this case by pushing a fraudulent "stock counterfeiting" conspiracy theory.

Above all, CMKM was a textbook case of corporate blame-shifting, and today the SEC put the blame where it really belonged, charging the company with a massive fraud in which Casavant personally raked in $31 million.

The SEC complaint observes:

Casavant generated investor interest in CMK by using false press releases, Internet chat boards, and "funny car" race events across the country. To divert attention from their own dumping of CMK shares, Casavant persuaded CMK's investors that the reported high trading volume in CMK stock reflected extensive "naked short sellng" rather than ordinary stock dilution. This promotion was extremely successful, and about 40,000 investors purchased CMK stock during the period of the fraud. In reality, Casavant ran the company from his house in Las Vegas, and CMK had no meaningful operations other than issuing and promoting its own stock. [emphasis added]

Patrick Byrne of has taken over the naked shorting banner from Casavant, and, naturally, his company has never made a dime in profits and is also under SEC investigation.

Unfortunately, it took CMKM years to grind its way through the SEC system, and the Overstock case is "only" two years old. So stay tuned--but be patient.

Floyd Norris, commenting on a typically paranoid email from a naked shorting nut, says "Do you think that reader will admit he was fooled? I don’t."

I agree, and the snail-like SEC, which did not "set any speed records for filing," as Floyd points out, must share the blame for that.

Apart from its extreme slowness in processing this and other cases -- Overstock's is a good example -- the SEC has made matters worse by pandering to naked shorting loons. The agency has diverted valuable resources in pursuit of its "Regulation SHO" idiocy, which has no real effect on the markets while fueling conspiracy theories that gull the naive.

© 2008 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

Labels: CMKM Diamonds, naked short-selling,, Patrick Byrne

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

From: StockDung4/8/2008 12:04:43 PM
   of 122062
Alberta Securities Comm. Hearing Against CMKM Diamonds on April 9

By Jeff Miller Posted: 03/19/08 14:02 [Submit Comment]

RAPAPORT... The following notice was issued today against CMKM Diamonds. For more information on CMKM, please scroll past this notice to read related stories.

The Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) has issued a Notice of Hearing to seek an order reciprocal to Saskatchewan and Manitoba orders against CMKM Diamonds Inc. ASC staff alleges that CMKM sold shares to Alberta residents without registering with the ASC or filing the proper documents required for distribution of securities under the Alberta Securities Act. The ASC hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, April 9, 2008.

CMKM is the subject of orders issued by the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission, Securities Division (SFSC) on November 9, 2004 and by the Manitoba Securities Commission (MSC) on October 31, 2007. The SFSC issued its orders based on allegations that CMKM violated securities laws in Saskatchewan by trading CMKM securities in Saskatchewan despite the facts:

- it was not registered to do so;
- SFSC had not issued a receipt with respect to those securities;
- SFSC had not issued an order granting exemptions from
registration and prospectus requirements.

The MSC issued its order under the reciprocal enforcement provisions of the Manitoba Securities Act. Both jurisdictions have banned all trading of CMKM securities and the use of securities law exemptions.

A copy of the Notice of Hearing outlining the allegations in their entirety is available on the ASC website at

The ASC is the regulatory agency responsible for administering the province's securities laws. It is entrusted to foster a fair and efficient capital market in Alberta and to protect investors. As a member of the Canadian Securities Administrators, the ASC works to improve, coordinate and harmonize the regulation of Canada's capital markets.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: StockDung4/8/2008 12:27:14 PM
   of 122062
CMKM Diamonds players named in $64-million SEC lawsuit

2008-04-07 20:16 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

by Lee M. Webb

CMKM Diamonds Inc., a revoked pink sheet woofer, and its founder, Saskatchewan native Urban Casavant, are among 14 defendants in a securities fraud lawsuit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The U.S. regulator claims that Mr. Casavant and his cronies pocketed more than $64.2-million during the fraudulent CMKM stock promotion. (All amounts are in U.S. dollars.)

The SEC, which acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission, filed its complaint against the alleged fraudsters in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on April 7.

None of the defendants has yet filed an answer to the SEC complaint and the allegations have not been tested in court.

The defendants

In addition to 51-year old Mr. Casavant, who skedaddled from Las Vegas, Nev., back to Saskatchwan about a year ago, the SEC tags 65-year-old John Edwards as one of the two masterminds and principal beneficiaries of the fraudulent scheme.

According to the U.S. regulator, Mr. Casavant made approximately $31.5-million from the stock scam and Mr. Edwards's take came in at a more modest $26.4-million.

Ginger Gutierrez and James Kinney, both 37-years old, are identified as two of Mr. Casavant's nominees. The pair served as CMKM investor relations representatives for a time and were allegedly instrumental in unloading more than 88 billion shares for Mr. Casavant and his family members, keeping a significant cut of the proceeds for themselves.

A husband-and-wife team of paperhangers from Boca Raton, Fla., 67-year-old Anthony Tomasso and 56-year-old Kathleen Tomasso, allegedly served as nominees for Mr. Edwards.

According to the SEC, approximately 77.3 billion CMKM shares were issued to five entities owned by the Tomassos, who generated at least $6.5-million by dumping stock. They allegedly wired more than $2.2-million to Mr. Edwards and transferred substantial amounts of money to some of his associates, keeping approximately $648,500 for themselves.

CMKM's transfer agent, 1st Global Stock Transfer, and its owner, Helen Bagley, are also named as defendants. According to the complaint, CMKM stock issuances and transfers accounted for more than 50 per cent of the transfer agent's business from 2003 to 2005.

The SEC claims that 61-year-old Ms. Bagley accepted suspicious payments from Mr. Edwards and his nominees while turning a blind eye to obviously bogus opinion letters and issuing more than 589.7 billion unrestricted CMKM shares to several of the defendants and others.

NevWest Securities Corp., which had its registration yanked last July, its chief executive officer and chief trader, 37-year-old Sergey Rumyantsev, chief compliance officer and general counsel, 42-year-old Anthony Santos, and 39-year-old broker Daryl Anderson are also named in the lawsuit.

According to the U.S. regulator, Mr. Edwards opened at least 36 brokerage accounts at NevWest where his accounts were handled by Mr. Anderson. With the help of NevWest and its accommodating broker, Mr. Edwards allegedly unloaded approximately 259.9 billion CMKM shares for proceeds of more than $53.3-million.

The SEC claims that NevWest and its principals turned a blind eye to the suspicious share dumping, which generated more than $2.5-million in commissions for the firm and accounted for more than 35 per cent of its revenue. Mr. Anderson earned approximately $2.3-million for handling Mr. Edwards's CMKM trades.

Nevada-licensed attorney Brian Dvorak, now living in Colorado, rounds out the list of defendants.

The U.S. regulator alleges that Mr. Dvorak wrote at least 464 attorney opinion letters authorizing the issuance of more than 606 billion unrestricted CMKM shares. The vast majority of those opinion letters were fraudulent.

In return for writing hundreds of bogus opinion letters, the regulator says that Mr. Dvorak received at least $495,000 from Mr. Casavant and his nominees during 2004.

Bare bones

Given that Stockwatch has published more than 60 articles dating back to October of 2003 about Mr. Casavant's wild pink sheet promotion, many readers may be familiar with the saga of the enterprising Saskatchewan native who managed to unload a staggering 703.5 billion shares on gullible investors before the SEC pulled the plug on the company in October of 2005.

In addition to Mr. Casavant, almost all of the defendants in the lawsuit have featured in previous Stockwatch articles.

SEC attorney Leslie Hakala, who is handling the regulator's civil complaint against the 14 defendants, is also quite familiar with the outrageous CMKM promotion. Ms. Hakala represented the SEC in the administrative proceeding that finally led to CMKM's revocation in 2005.

In future articles, Stockwatch will examine the Nevada lawsuit more closely and flesh out some of the details, but for now will offer a bare bones review of the promotion as it is laid out in the April 7 filing.

As noted in the SEC suit, CMKM fraudulently stopped filing periodic reports with the U.S. regulator in July of 2003. At the same time, the company gagged the transfer agent and would not publicly disclose how many of its shares were outstanding.

As part of the early promotion, CMKM asked shareholders to help "combat naked short selling" by holding their shares in certificate form. The naked short selling bogeyman figured prominently in the CMKM promotion.

Mr. Casavant then set about touting the company's purportedly fantastic mineral properties in Saskatchewan, which consisted of nothing more than untested moose pasture that saw almost no exploration work during the promotion.

In early 2004, the company dramatically announced a "kimberlite ore discovery" after some limited drilling on one of its properties, sparking a frenzy among some gullible investors who believed that CMKM had made a fantastic diamond find.

Mr. Casavant named the supposedly "new kimberlite discovery" the "Carolyn Pipe" after his wife. As Stockwatch quickly reported, however, the kimberlite body had actually been found in 1996.

"CMKM and Casavant also propped up interest in the company's stock -- while selling into the market -- through a variety of Internet activities designed to foster shareholder interest and excitement," the SEC claims.

Indeed, Mr. Casavant was incredibly successful in attracting a huge, cult-like Internet following.

"Perhaps Casavant's most effective tool to promote CMKM was 'CMKXtreme,' a team of motorbike, truck and 'funny car' racers," the U.S. regulator says.

Whether by luck or design, the funny car promotion was also a fantastic success.

"Hundreds of CMKM shareholders attended the races and visited the CMKM-sponsored tent, where they could study a map of CMKM's alleged mineral claims, watch a video loop of CMKM's purported drilling work, and meet and greet Casavant and his family," the SEC states.

"The press releases, Internet hype, and racing promotions were successful in attracting and maintaining a loyal shareholder base for CMKM for almost two years," the regulator continues. "The sustained demand for CMKM stock fueled by the constant promotional efforts allowed the defendants to continue selling newly issued stock to the public.

"About 40,000 people purchased CMKM stock in market transactions during the fraud, particularly after June 2004 when CMKXtreme became extremely popular."

As it happens, more than 40,000 people still hold worthless CMKM shares and some of them believe that the company will be revived.

The saga continues.

Comments regarding this article may be sent to

(Further information regarding CMKM Diamonds and associated companies can be found in Stockwatch articles dated Oct. 21, 2003; June 22; Sept. 16 and 24; Oct. 1, 15 and 20, 2004; Feb. 11, 14, 18, 22 and 23; March 1, 3, 4, 7, 14, 15, 16 and 21; June 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 29 and 30; July 1, 4, 6, 12 and 13; Aug. 2, 5 and 9; Sept. 7, 12, 27 and 30; Oct. 24, 26 and 31; Nov. 7, 11, 22 and 25; Dec. 1, 6, 9, 15 and 22, 2005; Jan. 3; Sept. 29; Oct. 4, 2006; and Aug. 30,2007.)


Reader Comments - Comments are open and unmoderated, although libelous remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.


Sounds just like $0.0001 Indocan Resources run by Jeffrey R. Bruhjell out of North Vancouver, BC, 5 BILLION shares!

Posted by Jeffrey @ 2008-04-07 20:24


LOL 5 billion Jeffery?? That's peanuts man!

Posted by I was scammed by CMKX @ 2008-04-07 20:39


got to hand it to Urban, he fleeced 'em good. Has to go down as one of the all time best scams.

Posted by Ron @ 2008-04-07 20:54


There is a day of reckoning coming for everyone and we all reap what we sow. Will Urban disappear before he is brought to justice? Go into hiding? Receive a visit from one of his many enemies looking for restitution? One thing is certain he will stand and give account for what he has done. We'll see what the next chapter of the unfolding saga delivers.

Posted by Kerry @ 2008-04-07 21:31


What took the SEC so long? How could they have possible let these crooks dump 700 billion shares?

Posted by Jeffrey @ 2008-04-07 21:41


Does the Urbie love-in cult now realize that they were duped? I bet there's still some out there that believe there's diamonds in d'em dar hills...and this is all just part of Urbie's master plan to make a million millionaires!

Posted by skruggs @ 2008-04-07 23:28


hey urban, saskatchewan is not that big, especially prince albert.welcome home!!!????????

Posted by night vision @ 2008-04-08 00:48


I didn't invest in CMKM, but it's too bad I didn't know Urban was involved or maybe I could have done something to warn everyone before it was too late. Then again, maybe shareholder greed would have made them deaf any ways.

Some of you might remember how he screwed everyone over quite a number of years ago with Petro Plus Ventures on the old Alberta exchange.

Sooner or later he will get what he deserves. Eventually everyone does!

Posted by Burned, but wiser for it @ 2008-04-08 01:27


Urban is a good Catholic boy and we must pray for him and dear Carolyn. They are losing their house. Please send anything you can in care of the Salvation Army in Saskatoon Saskatchewan.

Posted by Donny Brasco @ 2008-04-08 02:19


Urban will get what he deserves. The US sec will see to that. What a rotten piece of garbage he is,I hope he's proud of himself.

Posted by Jimmy Crusher @ 2008-04-08 02:42


If the SEC knew of this since 2003/4 why have they not done anything till now.

Posted by art brown @ 2008-04-08 11:17


Add a new comment

Name (required)

Email (optional)

Homepage (optional)

Note: this information will be made public along with your comment


Notes: There is no need to include any HTML formatting - just type your text in paragraphs separated by a blank line.
If you wish to add HTML formatting or links, they must be well-formed - start and end tags must match, and attributes must be in double quotes.
For instance:

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

From: StockDung4/8/2008 1:40:49 PM
   of 122062
GunnAllen told to pay ex-manager
By Helen Huntley, Times Staff Writer

Published Monday, April 7, 2008 8:36 PM

Tampa brokerage Gunn­Allen Financial and the national sales manager it fired over allegations of sexual misconduct three years ago both are claiming victory after a recent arbitration ruling.

Arbitrators for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ordered GunnAllen to pay former sales manager David McCoy $333,000 for compensatory damages for "intentional and malicious" breach of contract and for termination for a wrongful reason.

GunnAllen maintains that McCoy "engaged in extremely inappropriate conduct involving activities of a sexual nature at the GunnAllen offices," said Tampa lawyer William Schifino Jr., who represented the company. McCoy's New York lawyer, Richard Roth, says GunnAllen offered a female employee money to file a complaint against McCoy, but she refused.

"The panel never believed Dave did anything wrong," Roth said. The panel ordered Gunn­Allen to shoulder the costs of the arbitration, which involved 20 days of courtlike hearings, and to reimburse McCoy for $54,428 in costs incurred.

But the award was a whole lot less than the $34-million McCoy had requested. In fact, GunnAllen said it offered to settle the case years ago for more than McCoy received through arbitration. "We are ecstatic with the award," Schifino said. He said the company plans to bring a court action to confirm the arbitration decision and ask for an award of attorney's fees against McCoy based on his claims arbitrators rejected, including allegations of fraud.

The panel settled a stock dispute by ruling McCoy is obligated to sell 200,000 shares of GunnAllen stock back to the private company for $150,000, but he can keep 200,000 shares and options for 400,000 more shares. At one time McCoy claimed his shares were worth $12-million. The panel also said McCoy has to repay a GunnAllen loan of $182,407 but doesn't have to reimburse the company for $40,332 in business expenses charged to the company's American Express card.

McCoy now works in New York as national sales director for National Securities. Arbitration is commonly used to settle disputes between brokerages and employees or investors.

Helen Huntley can be reached


or (727) 893-8230.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: anniebonny4/8/2008 2:44:26 PM
   of 122062
Craig J. Shaber - another Attorney behaving badly...

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 57635 / April 8, 2008

In the Matter of

Craig J. Shaber, Respondent.


The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Craig J. Shaber (“Respondent” or “Shaber”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice.1

In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party and without admitting or denying the
Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing, may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any attorney . . . who has been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations thereunder.
findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III., Paragraph 2, below, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.

On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
1. Shaber, age 48, is an attorney licensed to practice in California.
1 On September 30, 2003, the Commission filed a complaint against Shaber and others in SEC v. Craig J. Shaber, et al. (Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2247/NDTX). On November 2, 2007, the court entered an order permanently enjoining Shaber, by consent, from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 10(b), 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-13, 13d-1, 16a-2 and 16a-3 thereunder. Shaber was ordered to pay $200,000 in disgorgement relief.
2 The Commission’s complaint alleged that from 1998 to 2002 Shaber, assisted by an associate, engaged in an elaborate scheme to manufacture and sell 18 public shell companies. To carry out the scheme, the Commission alleged that Shaber and his associate installed nominee officers and directors in dormant companies and caused the dormant companies to file false registration statements with the Commission and NASD, Inc. The Commission’s complaint further alleged that Shaber concealed his beneficial ownership and control of the public shell companies in filings with the Commission and realized substantial benefits from the sale of his undisclosed beneficial interest in the entities.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Shaber’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that Shaber is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney for five years. Furthermore, before appearing and resuming practice before the Commission, Respondent must submit an affidavit to the Commission’s Office of the General Counsel truthfully stating, under penalty of perjury, that he has complied with this Order, that he is not the subject of any suspension or disbarment as an attorney by a court of the United States or of any state, territory, district, commonwealth, or possession, and that he has not been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude as set forth in Rule 102(e)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice.
By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris Secretary

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: anniebonny who wrote (103259)4/8/2008 2:49:34 PM
From: anniebonny
   of 122062
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 18381 / September 30, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. 2DoTrade, Inc., George Russell Taylor, Barry William Gewin aka Barry Peters, Eric T. Landis, Dominic Roelandt, Michael D. Karsch, L. Van Stillman, David A. Wood, Jr., Clinton Walker, Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., FG & P Consulting, Ltd., Hackney Holdings, Ltd., Weston Partners, Inc., Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., Argo Financial, Ltd., 21st Equity Partners, Inc., MCG Partners, Inc., and LMR, Ltd., Civil Action Number 3:03-CV-2246-N(Godbey) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Craig J. Shaber, Stephen R. Wright, and Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendants, and Aspen International Marketing, Inc. and Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2247-G(Fish) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division).
SEC Files Lawsuit Against 2DoTrade, Inc., Its President, Several Stock Promoters, and Two Attorneys In Bogus Anti-Anthrax, Pump-and-Dump Scheme -- Also Files Related Lawsuit Against California Attorney and Accountant for $7.5 million "Shell-Factory" Scheme
On September 30, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit against 2DoTrade, Inc., its president, several recidivist stock promoters, and two attorneys in a "pump-and-dump" market-manipulation case. 2DoTrade is an SEC-reporting company whose stock was formerly quoted publicly on the OTC Bulletin Board. According to the SEC's complaint, from July to November 2001, the defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme in which they artificially pumped 2DoTrade's stock with false press releases, spam e-mail, and a fraudulent website and then illegally dumped millions of shares into the inflated market. At one point in the scheme-amid recurring reports of fatal anthrax attacks in the United States-several of the defendants sought to profit from the nation's fear of terrorism with false press releases about 2DoTrade's purported imminent distribution of an anti-anthrax compound in the United States. In a separate civil lawsuit filed on the same day, the SEC alleged securities fraud and other violations against a California attorney and accountant who created and sold the public shell company used in the 2DoTrade scheme.

The 2DoTrade complaint alleges that, in June 2001, defendants Barry W. Gewin, 36, of Enon Valley, Pennsylvania, Eric T. Landis, 38, of Charlottesville, Virginia, and Dominic Roelandt, 26, of Dehderhoutem, Belgium, gained de facto control of 2DoTrade-a shell company with no assets or revenue-by acquiring control over virtually all of its "free-trading" stock. Then, in collusion with 2DoTrade's president, defendant George R. Taylor of Ayrshire, Scotland, they manipulated 2DoTrade's stock price in two fraudulent promotional campaigns. The first campaign, which took place in July and August 2001, touted 2DoTrade's ownership of certain import/export contracts supposedly worth $300 million. In reality, these contracts were worthless. The second campaign, which began in October 2001, claimed that 2DoTrade was testing an anti-anthrax compound called "ATHOQ" at a hospital and a university in the United Kingdom for imminent distribution in the United States. In reality, ATHOQ was a sham, and no anthrax testing or product distribution ever occurred.

During the bogus-contract campaign, the defendants dumped millions of shares into the market, collectively realizing approximately $1.6 million in trading profits. As the defendant's sold their shares, the share price gradually declined by the end of August 2001. Beginning on October 31, 2001, however, the bogus anti-anthrax campaign drove up 2DoTrade's stock price again, this time by approximately 400%. During this period, certain defendants dumped over 700,000 shares into the market, for which they collectively received approximately $240,000. An SEC trading suspension on November 6, 2001, halted trading in 2DoTrade's stock and prevented some of the defendants from dumping millions of additional shares.

Other defendants named in the SEC's 2DoTrade complaint are:

Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., DBE Consulting, Ltd., and FG&P Consulting, Ltd., three Belize-registered companies controlled by Gewin. Gewin used offshore accounts in their names to sell approximately 869,000 shares of 2DoTrade stock during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $318,288 in ill-gotten gains.

Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., a Bahamas corporation, and Argo Financial, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation, both controlled by Roelandt. Roelandt used offshore accounts in their names to sell approximately 1.85 million 2DoTrade shares during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $474,005 in ill-gotten gains.

Hackney Holdings, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation, and Weston Partners, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, both controlled by Landis. Landis used domestic and offshore accounts in their names to sell 216,000 2DoTrade shares during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $154,300 in ill-gotten gains.

MCG Partners, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Michael Karsch, 41, an attorney licensed in Florida, Texas, and New York. Karsch was a managing director of MCG Partners, which provided $450,000 to Gewin, Roelandt, and Landis for the purchase of an OTC Bulletin Board shell company, which ultimately became 2DoTrade. In exchange for the $450,000, Karsch and MCG Partners received 1.1 million 2DoTrade shares and a guarantee that other defendants would sustain 2DoTrade's stock price by touting the bogus contracts in a promotional campaign. Under this arrangement, MCG Partners sold 1.1 million shares for approximately $555,191, realizing a profit of approximately $105,191. Karsch received a share of these profits.

21st Equity Partners, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, its president David A. Wood, Jr., 50, of Charlotte, North Carolina, and its vice-president Clinton Walker, 33, also of Charlotte. On June 26, 2001, Wood and Walker orchestrated a manipulative matched trade with Gewin and Landis to artificially set the initial market price of 2DoTrade stock at $1.25. Wood offered and sold approximately 293,000 2DoTrade shares through a 21st Equity Partners account for approximately $154,670. Walker received at least 101,350 shares of 2DoTrade stock, which he sold for approximately $52,520.

L. Van Stillman, 54, an attorney licensed in Florida and Pennsylvania, and LMR, Ltd., an offshore company that he controlled. Stillman prepared false SEC filings on behalf of 2DoTrade, concealing Gewin, Landis, and Roelandt's beneficial ownership of 2DoTrade's stock. Stillman sold approximately 192,000 2DoTrade shares, mostly through an LMR, Ltd. brokerage account in Bermuda, realizing approximately $95,370 in ill-gotten trading profits.

Several of the 2DoTrade defendants have prior disciplinary histories. In 1992, Taylor was convicted in the United Kingdom of conspiracy to commit theft. Roelandt was enjoined in August 2000 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Arizona for securities fraud in an action bought by the SEC, and in 2001, in another unrelated SEC action, he received an administrative penny-stock bar from the SEC. In 1999, the NASD suspended Landis' brokerage license for one year and fined him for market manipulation. And in 1998, Wood was the subject of an SEC cease-and-desist order for violations of the anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws.

The Commission's complaint alleges that defendant 2DoTrade violated the securities-registration, anti-fraud, and issuer-reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13 thereunder. It alleges that defendant Taylor violated the anti-fraud provisions and aided and abetted 2DoTrade's violations of the issuer reporting provisions. It alleges that defendants Gewin, Roelandt, and Landis, and the defendant companies they controlled, violated the securities-registration and anti-fraud provisions and also the beneficial-ownership and principal-shareholder reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 16a-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. And it alleges that defendants, Karsch, Stillman, Wood, and Walker, and the defendant companies under their control, violated the securities-registration and anti-fraud provisions and that Stillman also aided and abetted 2DoTrade's violations of the issuer reporting provisions of the federal securities laws.

The SEC seeks, among other relief, permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with pre-judgment interest, and civil money penalties against all the defendants; officer-and-director bars against Taylor, Gewin, Roelandt, and Wood; penny-stock bars against Taylor, Gewin, Roelandt, Wood, Walker, and Karsch; and an order enjoining Roelandt from violating section 15(b)(6)(B) of the Exchange Act, which prohibits participation in a penny-stock offering in contravention of an SEC order.

The Fraudulent "Shell Factory"

Also on September 30, 2003, the SEC filed a related lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Craig J. Shaber, 45, a California-licensed attorney and Stephen R. Wright, 57, an accountant, both from the San Diego, California area. According to the complaint, from 1998 to 2002, Shaber and Wright engaged in an elaborate scheme to manufacture and sell 18 public shell companies, from which they derived at least $7.5 million in ill-gotten gains. To carry out the "shell factory" scheme, Shaber and Wright installed nominee officers and directors in dormant corporations that they controlled and caused these companies to submit false registration statements and reports to the SEC and the NASD, Inc. These false documents gave the bogus companies the appearance of legitimacy and permitted their securities to be eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Among other things, the false registration statements and reports contained phony business plans, misrepresented the identity of the companies' true officers and directors, and contained false shareholder lists. In reality, Shaber and Wright owned virtually all of the companies' stock, and the individual shareholders listed in the documents were merely nominees for Shaber and Wright. In addition, Shaber and Wright served as the de facto officers and directors of the companies and intended not to pursue the stated business plans, but rather, to sell their controlling blocks of shares-and thus control of the shell companies-to stock promoters and other buyers for substantial profits. Shaber and Wright sold one of these fraudulently manufactured companies, Moranzo, Inc., for approximately $600,000 to certain 2DoTrade defendants, who then used it to create 2DoTrade and carry out that scheme.

The other defendant and relief defendants in the Shaber and Wright case are:

Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendant, a private Nevada corporation controlled by Shaber and Wright. Through Bonaventure Capital, Shaber and Wright maintained a bank account into which they deposited the funds from the sale of the stock in the public shell companies and maintained a brokerage account through which they sold securities in the public shell entities. Shaber and Wright, and entities they individually controlled, shared in the ill-gotten proceeds from the Bonaventure Capital accounts.

Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendant, is a California corporation solely owned by Wright. It received at least $100,000 from a Bonaventure Capital bank account as proceeds from the scheme.

Aspen International Marketing, Inc., relief defendant, is a Nevada corporation owned by Shaber. It received at least $1 million in proceeds from the fraudulent scheme.

The complaint alleges that Shaber, Wright, and Bonaventure Capital violated the securities-registration, anti-fraud, beneficial-ownership, and principal-shareholder reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and sections 10(b), 13(d), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1, 16a-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. It further alleges that they aided and abetted violations of the issuer-reporting provisions, specifically, sections 13(a) of Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC seeks disgorgement with prejudgment interest from each defendant and relief defendant and further seeks permanent injunctions, an accounting, and officer-and-director bars against defendants Shaber and Wright.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the British Columbia Securities Commission, the Police Department of Tayside, Scotland, the London Metropolitan Police Department, the Hampshire Constabulary in England, the FBI's Dallas Field Office, and the United States Department of Justice in the investigation of this matter.

SEC Complaint in this matter

Second SEC Complaint in this matter

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: StockDung4/8/2008 3:06:29 PM
   of 122062
New Zealand convicts 18-year-old "King of the Botnets"
18-year-old New Zealander, Owen Thor Walker, pleaded guilty earlier this week to six charges of using computers for illegal purposes. Walker, has been accused of playing a key role in a gang that infected 1.3 million computers around the world, installing revenue-generating adware and stealing information worth US $20 million. At the time of his arrest he was dubbed the "botnet king" by media around the world. Learn more about Owen and his arrest by following the link below.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: StockDung4/8/2008 3:20:30 PM
   of 122062
=DJ IN THE MONEY: Utah Co In Middle Of German Probe Of Stk Deals

Monday, April 07, 2008 3:38 PM

By Carol S. Remond
A Dow Jones Newswires Column

A Utah company has inadvertently gotten itself involved in a probe by German securities regulators into how a bank in that country got stuck with millions of shares of stock it didn't want in several companies after a client reneged on an agreement to pay for the stock bought on its behalf.

Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale, or NordLB, earlier this year said it set aside 82.5 million euros to cover potential losses resulting from an unnamed client refusing to take delivery of stock.

As reported by Dow Jones Newswires, German fund Vatas Holding GmbH has stuck NordLB with 13% of Curanum AG, 15% of Balda AG, 20% of Euromicron AG and 23% of RemoteMDX Inc. (RMDX), a Utah-based maker of ankle "bracelet" monitoring equipment used by law enforcement.

NordLB spokesman Jan-Peter Hinrichs told Dow Jones Newswires that the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, or BaFin, began its investigation Monday. Hinrichs said BaFin is looking into the circumstances surrounding the trades and trying to determined how it happened. Hinrichs said the bank would cooperate with the investigation.

A spokesman for BaFin declined to comment.

Following the affair, four individuals have left NordLB. A trader and his supervisor were let go by the bank last month. More recently, a general vice president in charge of capital markets as well as Juergen Koesters, a member of the bank's management board and head of securities trading operations, have also stepped down.

Hinrichs declined to comment on reports that the bank is looking to sue Credit Suisse Group (CS) over its role in the failed stock deals. Hinrichs also declined to comment on German news reports that NordLB has taken steps to freeze some of Vatas' other stock holdings, slapping a lien on the fund's 18.5% stake in Air Berlin PLC in an attempt to recoup losses from the incomplete stock deals.

A spokesman for Credit Suisse declined to comment.

Vatas also declined to comment through an email.

The fund is a large strategic investor in RemoteMDX and, in December, suggested in a regulatory filing it was considering taking control of the company.

NordLB said last month in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it holds 31 million shares of RemoteMDX, which it purchased on behalf of a client that refused to settle the order. NordLB said it isn't looking to hold the stock and plans to sell it.

According to a Dec. 28 filing with the SEC, Vatas held almost 17 million shares, including common stock and securities issuable upon exercise of warrants, or about 13% of RemoteMDX.

NordLB said in an SEC filing that it spent $116.6 million to acquire the RemoteMDX stock at an average price of $3.76 a share. RemoteMDX stock was recently trading at $1.55 a share.

Trades listed in NordLB's filing show that it bought and sold a huge amount of RemoteMDX shares, purportedly on behalf of Vatas, between Nov. 1, 2007, and Feb. 25, 2008.

Part of the filing doesn't make a lot of sense. For example, the filing shows that the bank bought 14.75 million RemoteMDX shares at $3.736 on Feb. 25. But 3.2 million shares traded that day and the stock never came close to that price, closing at $1.62 a share.

RemoteMDX offers TrackerPal, an ankle bracelet combining cellular and global-positioning-system technologies that help law-enforcement personnel track those who were the product through the company's SecureAlert subsidiary.

(Carol S. Remond is an award-winning columnist who won a Gerald Loeb Award in 2005 for best news service content with "Exposing Small-Cap fraud," a series of articles that described how three small companies unscrupulously pumped up their stocks.)

-By Carol S. Remond, Dow Jones Newswires; 303-997-5783;

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10