To: Ronald J. Clark who wrote (288) | 3/30/2000 12:36:00 AM | From: PuddleGlum | | |
Ron- AGA reported a withdrawal of 43 BCF from the natural gas storage, representing a decrease of 1.3% at 31.4% full or 1,021 BCF. This is from oilworld.com. Still drawing I see, how nice! My stuff is starting to move here, and we haven't seen the end of it.
pg |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (3) |
|
To: PuddleGlum who wrote (293) | 3/30/2000 9:04:00 AM | From: Ronald J. Clark | | |
PG: Here is the data
AGA Table Updated with Latest News
2000 1999 1998
1/14 -110B / 2127B 1/15 -203B / 2209B 1/16 -159B / 1860B
1/21 -195B / 2017B 1/22 -92B / 2117B 1/23 -159B / 1701B
1/28 -242B / 1775B 1/29 -78B / 2039B 1/30 -102B / 1599B
2/4 -213B / 1562B 2/5 -93B / 1946B 2/6 -81B / 1518B
2/11 -158B / 1404B 2/12 -59B / 1885B 2/13 -93B / 1425B
2/18 -136B / 1268B 2/19 -97B / 1788B 2/20 -77B / 1348B
2/25 - 74B / 1194B 2/26 -128B / 1660B 2/27 -47B / 1301B
3/3 -37B / 1157B 3/5 -69B / 1591B 3/6 -54B / 1247B
3/10 -31B / 1126B 3/12 -132B / 1459B 3/13 -143B / 1104B
3/17 -62B / 1064B 3/19 -87B / 1372B 3/20 -78B / 1026B
3/24 -43B / 1021B 3/26 -37B / 1335B 3/27 -20B / 1006B
3/31 ? 4/02 + 2B / 1337B 4/03 +53B / 1059B
Note: EIA revised 3/3/2000 draw from original -29B to -37B
NOTE: UPCOMING WEEK'S COMPARISON WILL BE AGAINST 1999 AND 1998 ADDITIONS TO STORAGE. |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: PuddleGlum who wrote (293) | 3/31/2000 11:26:00 PM | From: jbe | | |
Would be interested to know your reaction to the following article, from CBS Market Watch.
Indie E&P sector unearths new metric Old rules for exploration and production no longer apply, analysts say
By Kristen Gerencher, CBS MarketWatch Last Update: 5:34 PM ET Mar 14, 2000 Personal Finance News Mutual Fund Center
HOUSTON, Texas (CBS.MW) -- Has the well of investing wisdom run dry in the independent oil and gas exploration and production sector?
Not yet, but fundamental changes in the industry should convince investors to raise their standards, according to a new report by energy industry research firm Simmons & Company.
A schism beneath the surface of E&P stocks is calling for a new way to evaluate them, analysts say. Crude oil prices have tripled from their year-ago lows while stocks have languished in the last six months, so historical yardsticks like cash flow no longer measure up.
"The metric is shifting," Dan Pickering, managing director of research, told CBS.MarketWatch.com. "It's saying forget about growth. These guys can't grow fast anymore."
Tougher physical environment
Pickering and macro energy analyst Dave Pursell said firms should ground themselves in geological reality. Since oil-producing basins are maturing rapidly, companies have to drill more wells this year than last year just to keep production flat. Meanwhile, independents in the capital-intensive industry now face the same earnings pressure as their big oil counterparts.
"For years E&P got paid in the stock market to grow volumes," said Pickering. "Now the demand from shareholders [is] to grow volumes profitably. That is a sea change for a lot of these companies to think about and no longer kid themselves about what the returns are associated with projects."
Simmons followed 18 E&P companies in the report, including Apache (APA: news, msgs), Anadarko (APC: news, msgs), Burlington Resources (BR: news, msgs), Barrett Resources (BRR: news, msgs), Devon Industries (DVN: news, msgs), EOG Resources (EOG: news, msgs), Forest Oil (FST: news, msgs), Kerr-McGee (KMG: news, msgs), Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas (LD: news, msgs), Mitchell Energy & Development (MNDA: news, msgs), Newfield Exploration (NFX: news, msgs), Ocean Energy (OEI: news, msgs), Pogo Producing Company (PPP: news, msgs), Stone Energy (SGY: news, msgs), Unocal (UCL: news, msgs), Union Pacific Resources (UPR: news, msgs), Vintage Petroleum (VPI: news, msgs), and Vastar Resources (VRI: news, msgs).
From 1993 to 1998, these companies' average return on capital was about 6 percent, while the cost of capital was 12 percent, said Pickering. "That alone should tell you something has to change. That's what the market has been willing to ignore for the last quite a few years, and we don't think they're willing to ignore it anymore."
Harder scrutiny
Mark Meyer, Simmons' lead E&P analyst, said companies need to be more disciplined investors and better financial managers who execute on their reserves. In the meantime, retail investors should be looking for an initial multiple range of 15 to 25 times earnings as well as the more elusive factor of returns.
"That requires you to look individually at companies with a much harder scrutiny along several more complex dimensions," said Meyer. "If you accept E&P for what it is -- and I've characterized it as cyclical, (with) low margins (and) problematic returns -- then there's really no rationale for the group to trade on any kind of premium to other cyclical sectors that offer maybe more earnings stability or a little bit better growth than earnings or better returns."
The attraction of cheap prices has worn off and been replaced with questions of whether a company's generating strong returns, if it's drilling in basins with good money-making potential, and if it's a good operator, said Meyer.
Some companies have embraced the call for change more readily than others, said Pickering, who estimates the transition will take 12 to 24 months to sink in. "It took three years in big oil and it will take some time in E&P," he said.
Meyer pointed to Burlington Resources' move away from shallow water drilling and its substantial maintenance costs in the Gulf of Mexico as evidence of one "major portfolio shift." Apache, on the other hand, remains committed to growth, he said.
Putting growth in perspective
Wooing investors away from high-flying technology stocks into a sector that's slowing its growth won't be easy, said Meyer, adding that demand for E&P grows at 2 percent a year "at best."
"Not everyone needs to grow at 20 to 30 percent a year," said Meyer. "There's a margin issue there that erodes your returns if you overcapitalize or overinvest and try to grow for the sake of growth's sake when it's way in excess of demand."
Meyer noted that investors have many more choices outside of energy than they had in the last economic expansion. Then "it was okay to look at these guys in the context of explosive growth rather than the low to moderate growth cyclicals that they really are."
While the Simmons report challenges the conventional wisdom about how to measure the sector, Pickering said the firm is still bullish on opportunities in E&P long term. "The market will always come back to a good story," he said. "The problem is you're trying to figure out what are the good stories in E&P and that's not clear. As the market figures it out, I think there'll be some interesting stocks."
Kristen Gerencher is a personal finance reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com.
|
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: jbe who wrote (296) | 4/1/2000 6:03:00 PM | From: PuddleGlum | | |
Interesting article. I'm hesitant to change any standards right now just because we suffered so long under the weight of declining or uncertain product prices. Did you notice that e&p stock prices didn't really start rising until oil clearly moved off of its highs? In order to maintain adequate supply these companies have to drill, and those with good reserves today will be precious a year from now.
In the meantime, we may get some buying opportunities in this sector if money flows from here into to tech stocks, which is what I expect for this week. |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: PuddleGlum who wrote () | 4/3/2000 1:21:00 AM | From: Jamey | | |
New 8K filing for Royale Energy(ROYL) Stockholder Letter Good earnings expected for 4th qtr,99 and 1st qtr., 2000. Small Cap Ask is $3 1/16
freeedgar.com
Santiago |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
To: PuddleGlum who wrote (297) | 4/3/2000 2:17:00 PM | From: jbe | | |
Thanks for the response, PG.
Do you know anything about a little e&p outfit called Key Production Co.(KP)? On paper, and to an outsider like myself, it looks awfully good. Solid financials; great growth rate; at top of the heap, in terms of analysts'ratings (4 strong buys); and its price has been going up like a house afire. |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: jbe who wrote (299) | 4/5/2000 11:44:00 PM | From: PuddleGlum | | |
JB- I haven't followed KP in quite awhile. I track a number of e&p companies, but I own only APC and SFY. APA is one that I have owned and would like to own, but I'm not willing to add to my energy positions at this time. After this morning, that is, since I added some SFY today.
Not that I don't think that things are good for the sector in general, but I use Point & Figure TA, which indicates that many other sectors are due for a bounce, and energy represents a fairly high risk at this point. Note that this is entirely TA, not FA.
pg |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
To: Ronald J. Clark who wrote (295) | 4/7/2000 10:55:00 PM | From: PuddleGlum | | |
BTW, my last post was a grub. #300.
From oilworld.com: AGA reported a withdrawal of 5 BCF from the natural gas storage, representing a decrease of 0.1% at 31.3% full or 1,021 BCF ...
Now that was a small draw, to be sure, but it's against builds in each of the last 2 years, so I'm pleased.
pg |
| Strictly: Oil and Gas Exploration Companies | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| |