SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PoliticsDutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent?


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: sea_urchin who wrote (21298)7/5/2004 7:46:50 AM
From: mcg404
   of 75749
 
Searle, <video conversation with Chalmers Johnson> 58 minutes...and it restarts if you hit pause! maybe later. he did get me interested in the first few minutes with his reference to 'the search for new enemies' after the collapse of the FSU. Enemies - a basis human need? My enemy, you complete me.

john

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Nikole Wollerstein who wrote (21312)7/5/2004 7:50:01 AM
From: mcg404
   of 75749
 
Nikita, <Nadar is an idiot> Would you care to explain the reason(s) for you opinion? Or is it just a personal attack because you disagree with his politics?

john

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: mcg404 who wrote (21316)7/5/2004 10:21:36 AM
From: sea_urchin
   of 75749
 
John > sad little functionaries seeking to prevent the sort of religious war that plagued Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries.> Perhaps the same for the american prison guards at Abu Ghraib

Identical situation. It's always the "good" guys who are eradicating "evil". Just like here:

law.umkc.edu

And how does one know who the good guys are? They are the ones who support the government.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: mcg404 who wrote (21317)7/5/2004 10:32:41 AM
From: sea_urchin
   of 75749
 
John > You give americans too much credit for rational analysis

So, no-one can accuse me of being "anti-American"!

I'm satisfied, in my own mind, why the Iraqi invasion came about and that opinion doesn't change from week-to-week. In fact, it hasn't changed at all. Therefore, I just find it strange that others can have opinions which vary from moment to moment, apparently depending on a speech or an incident or a poll or whatever.

Accordingly, because the quoted opinion keeps changing, and for nonsense reasons, the American "analysis" isn't rational at all -- it's irrational!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: mcg404 who wrote (21319)7/5/2004 10:42:15 AM
From: sea_urchin
   of 75749
 
John > Are you liking gold shares these days?

My comments about the XAU "consolidating" were not predicated on my "liking" gold shares.

Shares go up and down all the time and it seems like it is time (on the chart) for gold/shares to go up a bit. There's nothing more than that -- no secret knowledge, no special belief in the Chinese economy, no imminent end of the world disaster, no hyper-inflation, no gold selling conspiracy, no nothing. Just me looking at some charts.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: mcg404 who wrote (21320)7/5/2004 10:49:36 AM
From: sea_urchin
   of 75749
 
John > Enemies - a basis human need? My enemy, you complete me.

I also didn't get it all so I can't fill in for you. But I did get most of it. I get pissed off these days with so many different audio/video formats, each requiring a special player or something different. If one could just download the file as an mpeg or mp3 and then play it at one's leisure, it would be a whole lot easier and better, but that's too simple. Everyone has to have at least six players connected to innumerable advertising streams --- and even then you have to be very lucky.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: sea_urchin who wrote (21323)7/5/2004 10:50:04 AM
From: philv
   of 75749
 
"I'm satisfied, in my own mind, why the Iraqi invasion came about and that opinion doesn't change from week-to-week."

I couldn't resist replying, as the invader himself doesn't seem sure, and has been constantly shifting his reason for the invasion. It has now come down to something like this: "Saddam was a bad guy, therefore taking him out was a good thing."

Quite a change from WMDs, clear and present danger, Al Qaeda links, nuclear weapons program, 9/11, etc. etc. which were all thrown in, in the beginning.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: philv who wrote (21326)7/5/2004 10:55:59 AM
From: sea_urchin
   of 75749
 
Phil > the invader himself doesn't seem sure, and has been constantly shifting his reason for the invasion.

He's sure, OK. The problem he has is that none of the reasons he told us are the real ones so he keeps making up new ones because he doesn't want to tell us the truth.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: sea_urchin who wrote (21327)7/5/2004 3:53:07 PM
From: sea_urchin
   of 75749
 
> The problem he has is that none of the reasons he told us are the real ones so he keeps making up new ones

us.f2.yahoofs.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: sea_urchin who wrote (21328)7/5/2004 4:33:53 PM
From: philv
   of 75749
 
Searle, that link doesn't work for me.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10