| To: Alex Raytselsky who wrote (10578) | 2/27/1999 7:50:00 AM | | From: John Ritter | | | | |
You think Fore will drop below 12, maybe even 10. This would seem to be a safe buy-in price. Price movement recently indicates an uncertainty that, if numbers are missed, would create a new bottom. |
| | FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: jach who wrote (10583) | 2/27/1999 9:51:00 AM | | From: jas cooper | | | |
Loaded the truck with tons of FORE. Last time loaded at around 12$ and emptied at 20+.
Ahhhh! The ghost of Adam Sornoff returns. After months of listening to the preeminent FORE bullshitter, we are now treated, in retrospect, to the master's uncanny trading ability.
Jach, my boy, I can only offer you the same as I would FORE's dynamic management team: We've heard it all before.
The difference between you and "these no-clue analysts" is "naive investors and MMs" are paying attention to them, not you. So who has no clue?
BTW, soon after Adam extolled his own trading acumen, he changed his ID, and faded into the background. Get the hint????? |
| | FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (4) |
|
| To: Jeff Lins who wrote (10580) | 2/27/1999 10:01:00 AM | | From: CJ | | | |
<I don't see anything wrong with this latest announcement.>- AND replies:
Jeff: After reading all I could find on Euristix and the terms of the acquisition, I completely agree with you.
Others replies to Jeff and "complaints": IMO*:
1. The concerns about the s/t impact on the price of the stock [especially this Q numbers for those who can't read, or comprehend what they are reading] are valid. While I will not now predict what may occur upon earnings release, I believe that yesterday fully "digested" the knee-jerk reaction; several of us treated it as an xllnt. buying opp.
2. Perhaps I am completely ignorant; however, I am confused about the mgmt.-slamming. What may be best for Fore Systems in the l/t, may not be best for FORE in the s/t. I would appreciate a reply re: the asserted incompetence of the mgmt.
3. Jach: You contribute frequently { :) }; sometimes I agree with you, other times .... In this instance, I completely agree with what you wrote about FORE, AND your comments about the analysts.
Lastly, we should all keep in mind that Fore Systems is staying more than alive, and keeping many technological advantages, in one of the most highly competitive sectors of the most highly competitive industry. These acquisitions are not only assuring and strengthening Fore's continued presence; but are also making it more appealing as an acquioree.
Yard work time ..... Have a good weekend.
Carol {TBoF}
.
* As always, you are implored to: Do your own DD; identify your own abilities and objectives; and, make your own decisions.
|
| | FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: jach who wrote (10587) | 2/27/1999 11:11:00 AM | | From: jas cooper | | | |
records speak for itself
Since I long ago got tired of reading the bulk of your posts, perhaps the pertinent one slipped by. Perhaps you could avail us, from your plethora of posts, of a single one where you considered FORE's price to be a selling opportunity.
I did, however, discover, that opposed to the legendary Adam S., Jach's expertise is not limited to FORE. In fact there's an entire thread devoted to his talent:
Subject 24648 |
| | FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| To: jas cooper who wrote (10588) | 2/27/1999 11:37:00 AM | | From: jach | | | | |
right on jassyboy, that thread is a prime example of so-called naive investors. Now, the slaves that built the thread are gone (realizing how absolutely wrong they're) and the master is just there safe guarding the thread, and posting once in a while doing posting at master's own wish. Subject 24648 |
| | FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: pie-faced-mutt who wrote (10591) | 2/27/1999 4:25:00 PM | | From: Kent Rattey | | | |
<"You get sparky bright people relatively cheaply," he said, adding that many American IT firms were facing a skills shortage.>
To pay $81,000,000 for a company that has annual sales of $5,680,000 is not relatively cheap, unless you own the shares they are buying. That's over 14 times sales.
Kent
|
| | FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| |
