SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Biotech / MedicalSAFS (Safescience, Inc.) formerly IGGI. Hot Potential


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Biopyro who wrote (95)6/30/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: Mr Zone
   of 110
 
OK good, cause I had my post typed and ready for you, just didn't submit.

Good Luck

Will

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Mr Zone who wrote (96)7/12/1999 1:47:00 PM
From: Daniel Levin
   of 110
 
Is there anyone still following this stock????

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (3)


To: Daniel Levin who wrote (97)7/16/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: rocket
   of 110
 
Yes, Daniel, still holding and very pleased with how the company is operating.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Daniel Levin who wrote (97)8/27/1999 11:24:00 AM
From: Ben Wa
   of 110
 
Abe S. might be

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Daniel Levin who wrote (97)9/2/1999 5:32:00 PM
From: Bob Trocchi
   of 110
 
Daniel...

I have just started to read the back posts for SAFS. I currently have no position.

In "The Street.Com," a few days ago, Herb Greenberg wrote up a story of SAFS, a very small portion of it is reproduced below. The Street.Com is subscription service so I choose not to reproduce the whole article. If you have a subscription you can find it. If not you can get a free 30 day trial.

>>Shuster tested SafeScience products from the store against such common name-brand household cleaners as Joy, Windex and Mr. Clean. Shuster did a complete compositional analysis and found that the SafeScience cleaners were 92.5% to 99.9% water (hey, that's purer than Ivory Soap). That means the SafeScience products have much higher concentrations of water than competing products.

That wouldn't be a problem if they could clean dishes and windows. But they didn't do that very well. "Based on the results of the compositional analysis of these cleaning products, it is clear why their performance efficacy was so poor," the report reads. <<

In general, the article is not very positive on SAFS. Can you give me your reactions to this article or simply the portion I reproduced and some good reasons for going long.

I am leaning to short this stock but I value input on both sides.

Thanks

Bob T.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Bob Trocchi who wrote (100)9/3/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: Daniel Levin
   of 110
 
Nothing in this article is new, something does seem strange with all these artcile coming out of nowhere about a company that hardly has a following. I have read both articles and I have used SAFS products myself and am quite happy with them. As far as the articles go they all seem to have an agenda and none of them give you any negative facts. If you want to short this stock go ahead but reread the last paragraph of the street.com article where it says that a positive news report could sky rocket this stock back to its high, I myself am always looking to add to my position at a good price so these short term drifts down do not affect me. In my opinion I am quite content on sitting on this stock for 5-10 years if I need to.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Daniel Levin who wrote (101)9/8/1999 1:47:00 AM
From: JMarcus
   of 110
 
In case you hadn't noticed (small chance of that), the plunge in the stock price bottomed and rebounded on the press release that, contrary to rumor, insiders have not been dumping stock. There sure seemed to be a concerted effort to drive the stock price down, but it looks like that effort has now run its course. I got in at 14-5/8 today and intend to hold this position for a good long term. There are so many ways for this company to win--it is really quite amazing.

Marc

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Andrew G. who wrote ()9/10/1999 7:15:00 AM
From: gringodoc
   of 110
 
Boston Globe slams SAFS:

boston.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: gringodoc who wrote (103)9/10/1999 10:00:00 AM
From: Daniel Levin
   of 110
 
Reread the article. It does nothing of the sort.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Daniel Levin who wrote (104)9/10/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: DaveAu
   of 110
 
You need to re-read it. Some pretty slimy characters associated with this scam:

"Pierce is best known in downtown financial circles as the Lehman Brothers broker who executed stock and option transactions for former Centennial Technologies Inc. chief executive Emanuel Pinez, the man at the center of a huge 1997 stock fraud scandal."

"Nahmias, the other SafeScience investor contact, also spent part of his career as a stockbroker. The National Association of Securities dealers barred him from association with any NASD firm in any capacity in 1996 as a result of a disciplinary case. Nahmias had been censured once before by the NASD and temporarily barred by state regulators in Tennessee for ''dishonest and unethical business practices'' in 1988."


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10