SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.

   Microcap & Penny StocksCAGI--A Sleeper Waiting to Wake Up!!!!


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: HARRY BROWN who wrote (1008)4/28/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: christopher
   of 1020
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: HARRY BROWN who wrote (1008)4/28/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: Philip Bosco
   of 1020
 
Great job guys. I wonder if Eyedrmike will follow us over there to the new thread. After all he is the one that told me to save the pumping for the fish. I hope he is better at checking eyes then he is at due diligence on a company. Just think Eyedrmike, that dive restaurant you said was the only income producing asset CAGI (excuse me) CGY has just lead to business plans in place that are expected to generate revenues of about 285 million dollars in the year 2001. Just how much does that restaurant charge for the surf and turf special.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: docsox who wrote (982)4/29/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: KiddStock
   of 1020
 
DOC SUCKS,

This stock has been up to $7.00 before and fell on its butt, just like GKI another one pumped by the same group of scamers. It is not reacting like a hot issue, comparable to all of the hype it gets here and on YAHOO.

DOCSUCKS, You sound like one of those who needs to Pump so that you can Dump.

This stock has a PE of 94 and generated only $3,000,000. A comfortable salary for a good CEO, but not for an entire company. If it does experience an upswing due to AMEX listing you better take your money and run before the P & D Boys beat you to the punch.

Come back it 5 yrs and you might make A something on this Hyper-stock.
It looks like it won't produce any substantial rewards unless shares were acquired in the past.

Today's price is too risky for now. The price action proves my point.

On the outside chance that you are not P & D Slime or PR Firm Ass.
Good Luck.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Philip Bosco who wrote (981)4/29/1999 11:31:00 AM
From: KiddStock
   of 1020
 
The price action on this issue confirms my concerns.

Attacking me does not change the fact that this stock is not performing as expected. The hype was double digits as soon as it went AMEX.

At this point $10.00 looks extreme - 94 x's earnings for a co. that generated only $3,000,000. is v. expensive without great fundamental potential which is not here at this time.

Attack me by ignoring my logic if you will, but unless I see this exceed $10.00 within the next 5 session I will stick to my opinion.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: KiddStock who wrote (1012)4/29/1999 1:44:00 PM
From: LarryS
   of 1020
 
Cosmos....you were always wrong when you
posted as cosmos, which is why you changed
your alias. Your constant whining trying to
hurt the price of CGY is not working. Can't
you understand no one here cares what you
say, unless you have something to back it up.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: LarryS who wrote (1013)4/29/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: KiddStock
   of 1020
 
DOWN 3/8 FROM OPENING! Man, just look at the price will you!!! It doesn't matter what you say or how you personally attack me.

This should have moved big time as HYPE-HYPE-HYPED by the Gullible, Dsy Traders, Pump & Dump Scamers or PR Parasites.

If you do not care what I say, then do not respond.

I like pulling your chain.

Have a nice day.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: KiddStock who wrote (1011)4/29/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: docsox
   of 1020
 
KIDDSTOCK

I repeat, do not go off your medication. It can't help unless you take it regularly.

Doc

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: KiddStock who wrote (1012)4/29/1999 11:27:00 PM
From: MTHONER
   of 1020
 
KIDD...Your simplistic comparison of CGY to GKI as "pump and dump" is faulty...

GKI soared to $19 on two factors...an AMEX-listing, and the FACT that Rod Canion (Compaq Computer-Founder) had signed on to run the ship.

GKI than tanked WHEN Rod Canion resigned after less than 6-months on the job. GKI continued to tank on margin-calls, and CONTINUED to tank when short-interest jumped in to take advantage of the aforementioned.

GKI's "run", and subsequent "fall", had nothing to due with "pump and dump". It dealt with cold, hard FACTS concerning "who" was (and was subsequently not) leading the company into the future. The "street" perceived and reacted accordingly.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: docsox who wrote (1015)4/30/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: KiddStock
   of 1020
 
Good advice, but don't you have anything better to do?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: MTHONER who wrote (1016)4/30/1999 12:08:00 PM
From: Philip Bosco
   of 1020
 
Mthoner:
I really liked your post the only thing is I think we are wasting our time with this Kiddstock. He does not understand anything anyway. He seems to get a rise out of ticking people off and getting a reaction from them. I wonder how well it worked when he held his breath in front of his mother. He is probably still doing that now.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10