SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Microcap & Penny StocksRADIUS RISES FROM THE ASHES (DODV)


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: R.S. Blum who wrote (1365)10/30/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: Martin Olsen
   of 1438
 
Bravo! Bravo!

Scott, Please let us know if you do receive any kind of response.
(I might suggest sending a copy to the CFO and also IR if they are
accessible by e-mail...)

I know that I am not putting one more shiny nickel into this company
until I am given a reason (other than "Wait 'til next Q! Or maybe the Q after
that...")

Insiders buying would definitely jack up the price. And insiders not
buying... well, we clearly see the results of that!

-M

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Martin Olsen who wrote (1366)10/30/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: R.S. Blum
   of 1438
 
Thanks Martin,

I will advise if I do ever receive a reply, but I'm not counting on it. Frankly, the way I look at it, if this Housely character does not start personally buying and quickly to avoid further shareholder losses, I want to know: WHY THE HELL NOT!!!

If not, get the hell out and don't forget the leave the keys. If we're going down the tubes, I want a CEO who's willing to go down with the crew too. Not some scumbag who drags his safe on the only lifeboat and chuckles as he watches the crew and investors flounder.

I say we start tallying shares on this, Yahoo and other threads to see how much push we have to force this turkey to start laying down his cards. I'm done with smoke and mirrors wait 'til next quarter crap. We can bitch all we want about Berger, but looking at the chart, this Housely ain't doing much better and I for one am getting friggin tired of the excusses.

The grace period is OVER Marky Boy!!!
-Scott

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: David Fortner who wrote (1364)10/30/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: Greg Thomas
   of 1438
 
forbes.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Greg Thomas who wrote (1368)11/4/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: Clyde Nazareth
   of 1438
 
I don't know if you guys check out the Radius board on Yahoo but I found this on it

Dear Friends of Radius:
>
>We are close to releasing information on the many changes and actions
>within Radius in recent months. Our press release, scheduled for the
>morning of November 11, will respond to many of your questions and
>concerns with facts, not assumptions, guesses or hype.
>
>The release is a week later than last year since our fiscal year closed
>a week later than last year.
>
>I read your comments and concerns regularly, and find them informative,
>thought provoking, entertaining and, sometimes, accurate. Hank Morgan,
>who continues to be most valuable in bringing me up to speed on Radius,
>and I will look forward to your comments after the press release.
>
>Ed Silliman
>Interim CFO
>Radius Inc.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Clyde Nazareth who wrote (1369)11/5/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: R.S. Blum
   of 1438
 
I would have liked to see the original source for that correspondence. Seems weird he'd make an original post with >'s. Far too many fake hankvmorgan's and the like on Yahoo to swallow that whole. Secondarily, the title which he later disclaims, 'The legal/auditor/SEC wraps are coming off', what the hell is this supposed to mean? The SEC has forced them into a closet for the last couple of years. Give me a break. Seems like convenient scape-goats for the lack of internal charisma. Sooo, even if genuine, this Ed clearly has no grasp on history nor current reality in as far as the market perception of rdus.

That said, still no response to my email to Mark. From what others have been saying, this damn creep has a bad habit of not responding even through we get confirmation of his receipt. One would accept this kind of behavior out of a firm and a CEO actually doing something worthy of a salary. In his present capacity and noting his performance thus far, he surely can use all the friends he can get. Kind'a gives a good feel for the fabric of this cat. Just along for the ride...

Arrogant piece of shit imho.
-Scott

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: R.S. Blum who wrote (1370)11/5/1998 11:42:00 AM
From: Clyde Nazareth
   of 1438
 
I agree, it is too easy for somebody to post a fake message so I called Radius and confirmed with Ed Silliman before posting it on this board. However, I would suggest anybody doubting the authenticity call Radius directly and confirm the message.

The phone number for Radius is (650) 404-6000

Thanks

Clyde

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Clyde Nazareth who wrote (1371)11/5/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: R.S. Blum
   of 1438
 
Chris,

Wow, you get around! I just replied to your post over on Yahoo!

Anyway, on calling direct, I learned a long time ago talking direct is a doggone waste of time. Unless they'll allow a tape recorder, I don't want to hear anything they won't say or comment on publically. Heck, they have an IR dept, if they have something worthy to say, I'm sure the press will listen. Release it!!!

Frankly, all of these turkeys just love having someone call and spread their smoke and mirror pipe dreams without formal confirmation on these threads. No thanks...

-Scott

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: R.S. Blum who wrote (1372)11/5/1998 2:01:00 PM
From: Clyde Nazareth
   of 1438
 
In regards to your previous post the purpose of calling Radius was to confirm that the post on Yahoo was, infact, made by Ed Silliman a Radius employee. In other words you do have a "record" of what was said it is his post on Yahoo. Now if you have questions pertaining to what was posted on Yahoo you can call him and ask for clarification but I don't see much to get excited about on that particular post. I am waiting till November 11th to get excited or disgusted. I have held radius for years and am at the point where only actual increases in stock price make me happy......the rumors/possibilities don't.

Thanks,

Clyde
P.S I also don't believe I was in anyway helping to hype the stock. I was just passing along info. on a post made by a Radius employee(remember I confirmed it before posting).

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Clyde Nazareth who wrote (1373)11/5/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: R.S. Blum
   of 1438
 
Clyde,

I wasn't accusing you of hype or anything, merely responding to your suggestion to call. I don't call for good reason as previously mentioned. As such, his explanation for making such a retarded statement 'The legal/auditor/SEC wraps are coming off' means nothing to me privately. I'm sure he meant the current quiet period, but delivered in a fashion insinuating an excuse for the prior behavoir as well.

Frankly, that itself was the only issue that meant anything beyond delaring 11/11 being getting out of the self-imposed closet day.

I guess we'll have to wait until then to see.

Good luck,
-Scott

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: R.S. Blum who wrote (1374)11/6/1998 11:07:00 AM
From: Sea Otter
   of 1438
 


Our little chihauhau is acting kind of frisky.

And, from I can discern, no one has a clue about
what is going on.

Reasons?

CFO posted on Yahoo??? Very, very strange. But of
course this can't be the cause of our rise. It
could be the cause of an SEC investigation though.

The Apple testimony at the trial? No, that seems
to be reaching way too far.

Clearly something else. Meanwhile, I guess we
can all just sit here, dumb and happy (sort of), and
see what pops out of the box.

Sea Otter

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10