To: Petz who wrote (6837) | 12/22/2006 3:49:29 PM | From: Elmer Phud | | | Petz
As I am unable to post a reply on the SI board I used this instead
Here's one example of your use of chipsets to explain Intel's apparently low yields. The discussion continued for several more iterations:
Message 17415851
You had to go back 4.5 years to find a post that said nothing of the kind. It simply says that the product mix is too complex to make any determination.
The point being that no matter how well intentioned, attempts to estimate fab output or yields are not going to be of much use.
This is your proof that we are "constantly claiming chipsets to explain low yields"? One 4.5 year old post? This is really lame Petz. You were caught in a lie and you compound it trying to wiggle out. An honest person would just acknowledge they misspoke and that would be the end of it. |
| AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| |