From: scaram(o)uche | 1/7/2018 7:32:20 PM | | | | Celgene buying fedratinib for what?????
PGS and friends discussing it at twitter, no need to digest here. "Incremental" has become CELG-important, a shame. |
| Incyte (INCY) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
To: former_pgs who wrote (3155) | 1/9/2018 1:59:18 PM | From: Miljenko Zuanic | | | At JPM, INCY was cautious on IDO1, so...PFE exiting IDO-target may (after hearing their and BMY presentation) sound as diversification from BMY-overlapping programs. IF PFE can afford (at least) 40% premium to current BMY MC, they would go after it.
Sorry to pollute INCY tread with PFE/BMY thoughts! |
| Incyte (INCY) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
To: Miljenko Zuanic who wrote (3158) | 1/9/2018 2:47:15 PM | From: scaram(o)uche | | | >> At JPM, INCY was cautious on IDO1 <<
With all of the commentary about duration and deepening of the response, and with the slide showing data vs. historical for PD-1 alone? Emphasizing that nivo/epa results were as strong as pembro/epa? I got the opposite feel, that they were very strong re. IDO1. |
| Incyte (INCY) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: former_pgs who wrote (3155) | 1/9/2018 3:29:40 PM | From: scaram(o)uche | | | These findings are important translationally, because they suggest broader clinical uses for D-1MT against cancers that overexpress any tryptophan catabolic enzyme (IDO1, IDO2 or TDO).
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>> does suggest one would make a mistake by extrapolating heavily based on the indoximod data <<
Yeah, but a mistake in which direction?? Isn't downstream inhibition of IDO1, IDO2 and TDO better than IDO1 alone??
The Incyte rationale for IOD1 selective agents is given here, third paragraph.....
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
So they would say "no". |
| Incyte (INCY) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (3159) | 1/9/2018 3:42:07 PM | From: Miljenko Zuanic | | | Indeed, P2 Epa-PD1 chombo data v PD1 mono (multiple indications) are very strong, still Mr. Market expect much translating P2 data to P3. That was INCY position. If they do not believe in chombo they will never license MGA012 (let MRK and BMY promote "marginal" IDO1 data), or for any other in-house combination. They know that they can not depend on partners if they want full and fair benefit from their own drugs, Epa included. |
| Incyte (INCY) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| |