To: Softechie who wrote (1275) | 12/31/2002 1:17:06 AM | From: jrhana | | | In summary of what I know: They were once felt to have a great PGM deposit. This turned out to be perhaps not as great as previously thought and unfortunately was mostly Palladium and not so much Platinum. Combine this with apparently one of the worst managements in history and you have:
finance.yahoo.com
All in all an excellent example of why not to buy a company on the way down. I vaguely thought about it a few times but luckily always held off.
Or as Mr. ZetaZeta more succinctly said:
<this company sucks> |
| Stillwater Mining , SWC (former PGMS) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: D.Austin who wrote (1271) | 1/23/2003 5:39:54 PM | From: Jordan Electron | | | Merrill Lynch has a history of downgrading the palladium price, claiming that supplies are adequate, when they can really be quite unstable. It's official predictions missed the great PD price rise, completely. |
| Stillwater Mining , SWC (former PGMS) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: yard_man who wrote (1282) | 2/18/2003 6:42:58 PM | From: Broken_Clock | | | I read the news release re: credit problems. Didn't sound good. BK is a definite possibility with SWC. More likely is a buy out or take over from NEM, ABX, etc.
Management really screwed SWC up, IMO. |
| Stillwater Mining , SWC (former PGMS) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| |