MGM Grand Hotel and Casino Symbol MGG | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech MGM Grand Hotel and Casino Symbol MGG

Previous 10 Next 10

To: John Mireley who wrote (65)	11/22/1997 8:43:00 PM
From: Steven W.	of 96

John, It was almost assured that MGG would get the green light in Detroit. Kirk's buddy Lee I. has some friends in Detroit. Being a former Board member of MGM might have had a little influence. I have been out of this stock for over a month. I have been waiting on the sidelines for a buy signal. EPS is going to be average because of the $250 million upgrade to the MGM Grand's main property. At around $40 - $42 it still is a great long term investment, but the short term makes me a little nervous. Steve

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: Steven W. who wrote (66)	12/31/1997 9:53:00 PM
From: Janet Madison	of 96

Steven, Is the buy signal here NOW? I think so. Happy and prosperous New Year!

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: Janet Madison who wrote (67)	1/1/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: Steven W.	of 96

Janet, I think you will see a short term bounce back to $40 in January. This is a great long term stock to own. The MGM and NYNY are doing great. The NYNY is doing the best of any casino in Las Vegas. They will be either selling more shares in the short term to pay for the Detroit Casino or taking on more debt. I would think since the stock is below $39.50, (the last issue price of outstanding stock) they would want to push the stock price back around $40. This stock also has a ton of new Strong Buy recommendations on it. I plan on getting back in very soon. I think at the current levels the downside risk is less then the upside potential. Steve

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: Steven W. who wrote (68)	1/4/1998 9:38:00 PM
From: UNDERTAKER	of 96

How much is Ted Turner involved with MGG, And in what role?

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: UNDERTAKER who wrote (69)	1/5/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: Steven W.	of 96

Ted, I don't know the anwser that question. This stock can't seem to make up it's mind on direction. I feel the pressure is to the upside. Still haven't bought in yet. Steve

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: Steven W. who wrote (70)	1/5/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: UNDERTAKER	of 96

I'm like you sitting on the fence.

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: UNDERTAKER who wrote (71)	1/9/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Steven W.	of 96

Got back into MGG today. I probably jumped the gun, but at $34.3625, the upside looks better than the downside. This month is going to be rocky for stocks. I'm holding on for at least $40. At estimates of $2.25 for the year, this is looking pretty good. Best of Luck, Steve

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: Steven W. who wrote (72)	1/11/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: UNDERTAKER	of 96

I'm waiting to see how this Asian thing gets played out. Casino stock earnings will be affected greatly by the Asian outcome. Casino paper might evan be a good short in the coming months.

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: UNDERTAKER who wrote (73)	1/17/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: Steven W.	of 96

This stock is going up. Earnings look good and lots of cash. I guess $34 looks pretty good right now. $45 is not far off. Steve

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: Steven W. who wrote (74)	1/17/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: UNDERTAKER	of 96

Hi Steve $45 would be just dandy. The company has nice cash flow to boot.

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)