SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergySpokane Resources V:SKN


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Sam Chong who wrote ()10/31/1997 7:33:00 PM
From: John Soileau
   of 51
 
News on Yahoo re: a mexican base metals project....but I want
action on the MAC! Gonna call next week
John

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: John Soileau who wrote (18)11/3/1997 9:12:00 AM
From: Adjuster
   of 51
 
Thanks for the info.

Ed

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Adjuster who wrote (19)11/10/1997 10:05:00 PM
From: John Soileau
   of 51
 
They're drilling Mac again, started today. 4 holes planned; 2 are for
metallurgical testing by Fluor Daniel Wright, which is moving forward with pre-feasibility. The other 2 deep holes are on the Peak zone,
near the center of the volcanics. They want to know what's going on
deep in there. Shallower drilling of the Peak Zone has found less than ore grade, they want to find the source. They will be looking for a
million, poss from a JV partner, to pay for more drilling next year.
The results of the 2 deep holes may be out by Christmas.

They are interested in the Mex props, but definitely the Mac remains
the #1 property.

I got this from IR, found them very helpful.
John

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: John Soileau who wrote (20)11/11/1997 12:35:00 PM
From: Adjuster
   of 51
 
Thanks very much for the update.

I get the realeases but I am puzzled why there is so little interest in the stock, when they have reported a one billion dollar value on the market value of molybdium reserves.

Ed

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Adjuster who wrote (21)12/5/1997 5:35:00 PM
From: John Soileau
   of 51
 
They are pretty non-promotional, that's one reason. Also, they
don't have deep pockets, so the deadly enemy --dilution-- is a fear.
Like Getty Copper, they have a great deposit but the magic ingredient, financing, isn't in the mix yet. Tax selling doesn't help either this time of year.
John

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: John Soileau who wrote (22)12/8/1997 10:08:00 AM
From: Adjuster
   of 51
 
Thanks John:

It looks like all resource companies are in the same boat, although it looks good on a chart.

Ed

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Adjuster who wrote (23)12/14/1997 5:35:00 PM
From: John Soileau
   of 51
 
A little news, a little dilution:
P R E S S R E L E A S E The Company wishes to announce that it has arranged a Flow Through Private Placement of 1,029,412 Units, at a purchase price of $0.34 per Unit to raise a total of $350,008 (the "Funds"). Each Unit is comprised of One Flow Through Common Share and one warrant to acquire a common share for two year period ending February 28, 1997, at $0.50 per share. The Warrants will be issued upon closing and will be transferable. The Funds will be placed in escrow, with the flow through shares being issued against payment out of escrow from time to time upon the Company producing receipts for qualifying expenditures on Canadian properties. The Company has until May 28, 1998, but not later than December 31, 1998 to incur, and renounce in favour of the investor in an amount equal to the Funds, expenditures on Canadian resource properties that qualify for flow through tax treatment. The Company will expend the funds on exploration of its Canadian resource properties. The placement remains subject to the approval of Regulatory Authorities
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
SPOKANE RESOURCES LTD.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: John Soileau who wrote (24)12/16/1997 9:29:00 AM
From: Adjuster
   of 51
 
John:

I take it that the February 28,1997 date is a typo and should be February 28, 1998???????

Thanks for the follow up!

Ed

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Adjuster who wrote (25)12/16/1997 5:23:00 PM
From: John Soileau
   of 51
 
Yes it was a tpyo!!!!!!!!
Thkns for pnoiting that outt!!!
John

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: John Soileau who wrote (26)1/5/1998 8:01:00 AM
From: John Soileau
   of 51
 
I got the annual report last week. It was irritating to see the
Mexican property venture given first priority in the discussion
section--with the Mac project playing second fiddle. A small detail,
but telling in my opinion.
John

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10