SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsValue Investing


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Paul Senior who wrote (20862)4/5/2005 10:23:35 PM
From: Spekulatius
   of 71230
 
re WMT - I redeployed the funds from my BUD share sale into WMT. I think that WMT has better growth prospect which makes it a better investment at an equal PE IMO. Shame factor of owning both stocks is about equal for both ( I never got around of finishing my first and last bottle of Bud light).

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (4)


To: Spekulatius who wrote (21059)4/5/2005 10:49:19 PM
From: Wallace Rivers
   of 71230
 
I purchased WMT on Friday on the point plus drop. I've had good luck trading it, and it will probably be little more than the same - a trade.
Trading at a PE of 20, the very low end of its recent historical range.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Spekulatius who wrote (21059)4/6/2005 12:38:04 AM
From: Paul Senior
   of 71230
 
BUD, WMT. Both high shame stocks for me. WMT so bad imo, that I won't even put it on my screens to remind me of it. As for BUD, my family mostly scoffs at anyone who would consider Budweiser as a beer of choice.

Ah well, I still hold BUD. I'm too ashamed about WMT to admit owning any, or confess that I might add more should the stock drop about another 1/2 point to a new annual low. -g-

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Bob Rudd who wrote (15637)4/6/2005 1:33:13 AM
From: Paul Senior
   of 71230
 
SGR: Well, for those of us still with it, it looks like this year we've come back up from the valley:

finance.yahoo.com

Shaw's just had or is having a stock offering, and I assume that that has contributed to today's drop in the share price. I hope and expect the drop to be temporary, and I added a few shares today assuming I might correctly be seeing an opportunity.

We know the power market collapsed a few years back, almost taking Shaw down with it. Those problems are behind Shaw (I presume.) Business has come back, and I am hoping business continues to improve as we enter '06. I don't know the intracacies of Shaw's contracts (e.g customer cancellation clauses/terms, % completion accounting, fixed cost contract or not, etc.), but overall, the latest company p.r. from Monday looks promising to me:


"Shaw's backlog totaled $5.1 billion at February 28, 2005, with approximately $2.4 billion, or 46% of the backlog expected to be converted during the next 12 months. Approximately $2.6 billion, or 50%, of the backlog is in environmental the and infrastructure sector, primarily contracts with Federal government agencies and commercial entities; approximately $1.8 billion, or 35%, of the backlog is comprised of projects for energy industry customers, primarily nuclear and fossil fuel power plants; and approximately $0.7 billion, or 13%, related to projects for chemical process industry facilities."

Stock is now under $20. I'll try to hold 18-24 months to see if it might reach $30.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Suma who wrote (21050)4/6/2005 1:33:46 AM
From: Lazarus
   of 71230
 
if you give any credence to this sort of thing:

stockta.com

it still looks good.

Lazarus

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Paul Senior who wrote (21061)4/6/2005 9:33:23 AM
From: Grommit
   of 71230
 
shame stocks! what a good term. i refuse to buy C or BAC due to widely publicized exec compensation issues. now i have a term for my behavior (or their behavior).

yahoo.reuters.com

grommit

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Spekulatius who wrote (21059)4/6/2005 1:06:07 PM
From: Paul Senior
   of 71230
 
Spekulatius, timely move by you out of BUD! Poor earnings report out today, and stock down to new lows.

I'll add a few more shares to my losing position.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: hoyasaxa4/6/2005 2:23:33 PM
   of 71230
 
Pick for 18 years

Thanks for the comments, Paul! Working with my father in law in the real estate/ private equity business and no longer an equity analyst. Planning on invest 15K in each of the next 4 quarters in a different fund for our new little man. Leaning with first pick towards the Third Avenue Value Fund or the Vanguard S&P Index.

Noted my major positions in my last post. Centerpoint Energy probably my best pick for the next five years. Still holding Dale's CETV (sold half the position at 51, bought in high teens, low twenties, thanks Dale).

Mike B. and Dale and good old Jim C. are certainly good folks. This thread and Dales remain the only one's I look at regularly.

Interested also in any commentary on my "state of the world" rant.

All the best- HoyaSaxa

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: hoyasaxa who wrote (21066)4/6/2005 2:37:40 PM
From: Dale Baker
   of 71230
 
If history is any guide, buying and holding some Berkshire B (BRKB) shares for 18 years would probably be a good move. It's as good as just about any diversified big cap fund around.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: hoyasaxa who wrote (21066)4/6/2005 4:48:21 PM
From: Paul Senior
   of 71230
 
hoyasaxa, more comments, Third Value, Excelsior

Third Value seems like an easy choice, but I'd pass on it. Marty Whitman's 80 years old. He was on Bloomberg for an hour this week - still sharp but slipping a bit; he has aged since I last saw him on TV. (Cripes, I'm slipping too. Ugh)
C. Jensen, his main(?) successor may be good, but may not be as good as The Master.

Check WSJ, 4/4 Quarterly Mutual Fund Review, pg. r4 article on John Keeley of Keeley Small-Cap Value. Family and friends of Keeley invest in this value and restructuring fund. Ten year annualized return of 17.4%, according to the article. No investment greater than 1.2% of assets. Has a high load fee though, which they might be considering reducing. (Possibly I've got my preferences in this suggestion more so than what you might be wanting - namely, I like the value aspect, the off-beat stuff (restructuring), the diversity, the family business (eats own cooking), and investment experience (Keeley's 64 years old)).

Also look at Torray fund. He makes concentrated buys with the view of holding his stocks ten years or more. (aside: He's been a buyer of BUD. Wonder what his opinion of it is now.)

All jmo, I'm no expert, and I am wrong a lot.

---------
CETV seemed too expensive to me and too hard to for me to figure - Sorry I missed that one. I am still holding all shares bought of LH though - your 11/'02 pick here.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10