The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: elmatador who wrote (13553)	6/18/2025 9:42:00 AM
From: carranza2	3 Recommendations Recommended By E_K_S elmatador nicewatch Read Replies (2) of 13610

The bunker buster(s) necessary to damage Fordow weigh 30 tons, not 15 tons as the article suggests. The only vehicle stealthy capable of carrying and delivering such a heavy load is the B-2 bomber which only the US possesses. Also, of course, B-52s. Putting a B-2 at risk is dicey. Whether the Iranian air defenses have been degraded enough to make Iranian air space safe for a B-2 is unknown. A big lumbering unstealthy B-52 might be at substantial risk. We really do not know how degraded the Iranian air defenses are. However, I would imagine that some sort of air defenses steps have been taken to protect Fordow. It is likely that these issues are being hotly debated at the White House as we speak. It is a hugely difficult decision for Trump. And this is the reason he is trying to get into the mullah’s head by suggesting that he could be killed on a whim. A surrender would obviate the need to bomb Fodrow, a mission whose success is not guaranteed.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next