SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Don Green9/18/2024 7:38:58 PM
   of 43879
 
Red Sea Lessons Informing Fleet Forces’ Combat Surge Model, Says Admiral

Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Carney (DDG-64) defeats a combination of Houthi missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles in the Red Sea, Oct. 19, 2023. US Navy PhotoVIRGINIA BEACH, Va. – The short-notice surge of U.S. warships from the East Coast to take on missile and drone threats in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea is informing a model for how the Navy will surge ships to fight in future conflicts, the commander of U.S. Fleet Forces Command told a group of naval engineers on Tuesday.
With about two weeks’ notice, Fleet Forces prepared guided-missile destroyers USS Carney (DDG-64) and USS Mason (DDG-87) to sail from Virginia and Florida to augment ships already in the region, Adm. Daryl Caudle said during a keynote at the ASNE Fleet Maintenance and Modernization symposium.

Carney and Mason both went on to serve as part of Operation Prosperity Guardian and downed hundreds of missiles, one-way attack drones and attack surface craft launched by Houthi forces in the Middle East.

The ships were classified as combat-ready surge forces that met a minimum level of qualifications to quickly deploy in the event of a crisis.

A combat-ready force component is “a unit that within an acceptable level of risk, I would have confidence that could go into combat… and I know it can do a few things,” Caudle said.
“I know it can maneuver, communicate, shoot and defend itself… They’re good enough.”

Under the construction, every ship and submarine on the waterfront are ranked by their ability to be ready in time to surge.

That was the case for the DDGs sent to the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent Houthi attacks on merchant traffic in the Middle East.

In preparation to go forward, “we quickly gave them an intelligence brief. Gave them some synthetic training on what we thought they would see and within a couple of weeks we were pushing two more DDGs across the Atlantic,” Caudle said.

The ships stayed for months in the Middle East reloading as needed to keep present against the Houthi drone and missile threat.

Caudle is planning for stories like Mason and Carney to be the new normal for surface ships. He framed the combat surge as an answer Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti’s ongoing call for more players on the field to meet the demand for forces, he said.

Overall, the trend will move toward shorter maintenance periods and longer periods in a ship’s life where they will be able to move at short notice.

“The expectation is that you flow within 30 days,” Caudle said.

In addition to restocking missiles, Caudle said the Navy needed to improve maintenance rates and look at other ways to conduct the maintenance in the U.S. and overseas to maximize the surge capacity.

Adm. Daryl Caudle, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, delivers keynote remarks at the 2024 American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE) Fleet Maintenance and Modernization Symposium at the Virginia Beach Convention Center, Sept. 17, 2024. US Navy Photo“We are looking at potential benefits of shorter duration or frequent availability to reduce scope,” he said.
“For the global maritime response plan to reach its full potential of generating surging and regenerating forces, our maintenance and modernization team will have to think about how to scale both operations and output to quickly respond to increased demands.”

Throughout his speech, Caudle emphasized the expansion of Chinese naval power, Beijing’s close relationship with Moscow and the growing technology exchange between the two as the imperative to speed up maintenance rates and improve Navy readiness.

Caudle said it took years for U.S. industry to catch up after the attack on Pearl Harbor to meet the needs of the war effort and implied a modern conflict might not allow for that length of time to support a fight.

“It would surely take time for us to get to the gold standard of production we enjoyed in our industrial base by 1943 until about the war’s end. Said another way, consider that today is Dec. 6, 1941, are we ready for Dec. 7th?”

Related
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext