SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (436213)9/12/2024 6:14:17 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) of 436256
 
Maceng, old chap:

I have brought the opinion of 10's of thousands of scientists to the thread :)!!

Which you seem to think are all wrong, or bought off, or what?

The idea the entire population of atmospheric PHD scientists are all wrong or paid off, is to be honest silly at best!

When you talk about the circumference of the earth, as though that is new startling evidence, is silly.

These guys know all of that and a truck load more. They can tell you if a methane molecule is from the arctic or the tropics!

PS and leave CNN out of this. They had nothing to do with my opinion-lol.

You have to quit ragging on CNN, they are not that bad.

If you want the correct people to rag on, that would be FOX.

Now they lie, a lot-lol!


Hi koan,

If you bother to listen to Zoe Phin, she will tell you the Earth is in fact an Oblate Spheroid, not a perfect Sphere (i.e it's not "round"). At least one academic failed to notice the care she put into her calculations, while he failed to do so in his.

I don't care what your sources have said. They need the research grants and approvals to exist. Unfortunately this means they are compromised and that is clear to anyone who takes the time to examine the record instead of just listening to the hogwash from the "scientific community" (as you call it) and to CNN etc. The "talking heads" who are nothing but puppets on strings.

Don't you think the sources I have provide are good examples of the "scientific community"? It includes some of the very highest achievers out there.

We are done here, you have bought nothing new to the table.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News