We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment
NRG 74.19-3.2%Jul 24 4:00 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 3bar who wrote (6064)6/7/2024 3:39:16 PM
From: Doug R2 Recommendations

Recommended By

  Read Replies (1) of 6081
He got some things right but was wrong in so many ways I wouldn't know where to begin. Very sloppy.
"...mass extinctions seem to have been limited in scope..."
It's either mass or not. Limited in scope is nonsense. It's like 'a little pregnant'. Neanderthals went extinct during an excursion.
And many, many, many more species than the 3 he mentioned.
The spike in radio carbon levels can only be caused by intense solar activity...superflare, micronova. A weak magnetosphere alone couldn't possibly do it.
The claim that "many" excursions didn't affect life at all is utterly false.
There's more. And besides, Astrum is fully on board the AGW propaganda train.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext