AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA

AMD 117.04

-1.2%

1:10 PM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joe NYC who wrote (42928)	9/22/2021 5:35:05 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) of 67659

But even if the big cores do 2/3rds, the little cores are only taking up 20% of the CPU core die area, so performance/area/w is likely much better. And I'm not so sure the big cores are doing 2/3rds. They certainly are not getting two threads with each thread as good as the single thread Gracemounts clk for clk. So the question is who much different are the clocks? I'd say 60:40 might be closer. In which case 80% of the core die area is doing 60% of the work, and 20% is doing the other 40%. Remember the hint that Intel might roll out a big.LITTLE device with like 32 little cores? I thought that was an error in the article, but I can see how that might be an OK design.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next