SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 308.88-3.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (206995)12/6/2019 11:57:05 AM
From: Moonray  Read Replies (3) of 207426
 
If these are "fresh antitrust violations," why does the article bear a Reuters 2017 copyright date? Fake old news?
I have no idea about the Reuter's date, you'll have to ask them.
The story's by-line says:
Written by Robert Smith × December 6, 2019
and the story says:
The accusations, made in a filing late Tuesday in US District Court for
the Southern District of California, are counterclaims to a seeking to
force the contractors to pay Qualcomm licence fees that Apple
directed them to stop paying.

So I have no reason to believe it is fake news.
A lot of times Qualcomm bulls believe any story is fake if it has
something detramental to say about QCOM. Perhaps the four
contractors thought they had fresh info seeing the headline:
Qualcomm to appeal against another antitrust whopper:
This time it's $873m courtesy of South Korea

o~~~ O
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext