SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
IMMU 85.36+0.1%Sep 25 4:00 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: drtom1234 who wrote (45929)4/27/2018 9:09:22 PM
From: weatherproof7 Recommendations

Recommended By
bobbseytwins2001
captcobra1
idahoranch1
ladyPI
patlawche11

and 2 more members

  Read Replies (1) of 58497
 
My thought is that they set out accruing a minimal amount of patients for the first stage in a 2-stage phase II. It is my sense that the response rate in both urothelial and hormone positive BC were high enough to reject the null hypothesis (drug inactive due to lower than a predetermined response rate.) I'm also doubtful that the trial was stopped for efficacy. I think we're just seeing the trial suspended as they take the numbers from the basket trial representing stage one, and now determining the sample size, and such, for the second stage. The bad news would have been that they're not proceeding with the second stage due to inactivity of the drug or some issue with toxicity. I don't believe we're seeing any signs of that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext