he's equating "tested" with stack test -- nothing says that it needs a formal stack test from CRA. In fact, the language he quotes suggest that it can be self tested "using EPA methods"
If they do 3 tests on 3 machines, that's fine. Who cares? It doesn't invalidate the stack tests because it doesn't say anything about a formal stack test. Looks more like a self-administered progress report which is normal and a far cry from "fines and shutdowns" as was orignally falsely insisted by SteveF.