foreign affairs, unchaperoned Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : foreign affairs, unchaperoned

QCOM 168.90

0.0%

Oct 4 9:30 AM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: marcos who wrote (255)	4/21/2005 8:33:11 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) of 261

yes i realise that you intend it as response to Nadine's stupid question but think about it, how does that advance the sum of human understanding It's really not that complicated. Here it is again: "Nadine's question would be wholeheartedly approved of by FL and the mainstream media. My question would rightly be scorned (and probably evoke instant permanent banning) by FL and the media." One cannot even begin to analyze American politics until one understands the inherent biases of our political community. On the topic of the Middle East, this example speaks volumes. Nadine's question is not significant. It is the reaction to her question that informs us. Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next