Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: paul_philp who wrote (64627)	1/6/2003 2:12:22 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I gather from this post you are now agreeing with my point about Iraq and oil. No. Not in the least. Not even a little bit. What you give with one hand, you take away with the other. Well, I have no idea what your argument is. It is oil; it is not oil. It is sex; it is not sex. It remains beyond me to see how anyone could imagine that the fundemental, but certainly not the only thing, is the oil. And the purported danger Saddam represents to stable global energy prices. But, if you don't think so, , , , ,

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next