|" however, therein lies the argument of who started it in the first place. "|
Was the remainder of that sentence you left out.
To which you assert, " Except that Israel was the aggressor, unquestionably. "
As I said " therein lies the argument of who started it in the first place ".
If a group of people surround my home with bazookas aimed at me, I might just be tempted to take them out as a pre-emptive defense measure, as opposed to waiting for the place to possibly go up in flames.
They may whine and say what they want later after I bring them to their knees,things like " we really weren't going to attack..we were just...uh..uh...showing off our new stuff...ya!..that's the ticket!....showing off our new stuff
to uh...uh,,,scare you!...ya..that's it...scare you...etc..
Sorry Thomas...I don't buy it... neither did Israel.. and they are still here today to tell the story.
That's the crux of the argument for me Thomas.I will not discuss that aspect further.
But to reiterate....peace is the objective for me...not who was right and who was wrong...who started..who didn't...
Just find a merciful solution without war.
Here's a few Canadian links, if you're interested, that shows how divided that argument still is.........
And this one from Norway :
I have nothing further to add to this subject.